DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

DEVELOPMENT OF PREDICTABLE STABILITY TEST FOR ASSESSMENT OF OPTIMUM LOADING TIME IN DENTAL IMPLANT

  • Kim, Seong-Kyun (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Heo, Seong-Joo (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Koak, Jai-Young (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Joo-Hee (Department of Prosthodontics, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan) ;
  • Kwon, Ji-Yong (School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • Published : 2008.12.31

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The application of a simple, clinically applicable noninvasive test to assess implant stability are considered highly desirable. So far there is still a controversy about correlation of various tests and implant stability. PURPOSE: In order to assess implant stability, the development of a new method is critical. It's possible to assess implant stability by calculating energy and angular momentum during implant installation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the correlation of energy and implant stability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty three implants were installed in two different types of pig bone. Type I bone was retrieved from the distal aspect of the rib, with more cortical bone. Type II bone came from a more proximal region with less cortical components and a higher content of bone marrow and spongeous trabeculae. Insertion torque, removal torque, ISQ values and angular momentum and energy were measured. Pearson Correlation test was done to analyze the relation between RFA, maximum insertion torque, mean insertion torque, bone type, energy and removal torque. RESULTS: Type I bone showed higher removal torque than type II bone. Energy value was significantly correlated with maximum insertion torque and mean insertion torque. RFA values were related with insertion torques but the significance was lower than Energy value. CONCLUSION: Within the limitation of this study energy values were considered clinically predictable method to measure the implant stability.

Keywords

References

  1. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegtated implants in the treatment of the edentulous saw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  2. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstro m J. Osseointegrated titanium implants: requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone to implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-70 https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776
  3. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinanat. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:491-501
  4. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Linden B, Grondahl K, Lekholm U. Stability measurements of one-stage Branemark implants during healing in mandibles. A clinical resonance frequency analysis study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;28:266-72 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(99)80156-8
  5. Meredith N. A review of nondestructive test methods and their application to measure the stability and osseiontegration of bone anchored endosseous implants. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1998;26:275-91 https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v26.i4.20
  6. Friberg B. Sennerby L. Meredith N. Lekholm U. A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurement of maxillary implants: A 20-month clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;28:297-303 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(99)80163-5
  7. Meredith N, Book K, Friberg B, Jemt T, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in vivo. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of resonance frequency measurements on implants in the edentulous and partially dentate maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8: 226-33 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080309.x
  8. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:261-7 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070308.x
  9. Barewal RM, Oates TW, Meredith N, Cochran DL. Resonance frequency analysis of implant stability in vivo on implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:641-5
  10. O'Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implant: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 200;2:85-92 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00110.x
  11. da Cunha HA, Francischone CE, Filho HN, de Oliveira RC. A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency in the assessment of primary stability and final torque capacity of standard and tiunite single-tooth implants under immediate loading. Int Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:578-85
  12. Kim SK, Kwon JY, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Lee JH. Software for measurement of load developed with implant installation. Intellectual property rights 2007-01-199-004156, 2007
  13. Kim SK, Kwon JY, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Lee JH. Software for measurement of energy absorbed by bone. Intellectual property rights 2007-01-199-004155, 2007
  14. Sennerby L, Thomsen P, Ericson LE. A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:62-71
  15. O'sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Influence of implant taper on the primary and second stability of osseointegrated titanium implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 2004;15:474-80 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01041.x
  16. Ostman PO, Hellman M, Wendelhag I, Sennerby L. Resonance Frequency Analysis Measurements of Implants at Placement Surgery. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19:77-83
  17. Lim SA, Cha JY, Hwang CJ. Insertion torque of orthodontic miniscrews according to changes in shape, diameter, and length. Angle Orthod 2008;78:234-40 https://doi.org/10.2319/121206-507.1
  18. Walker J. Applied mechanics London: Hodder and Stoughton; 1972.pp 41-2
  19. O'Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Jagger D, Meredith N. A comparison of two methods of enhancing implant primary stability. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6:48-57 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00027.x

Cited by

  1. A comparison of bone bed preparation with laser and conventional drill on the relationship between implant stability quotient (ISQ) values and implant insertion variables vol.2, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2010.2.4.148
  2. The relationship between initial implant stability quotient values and bone-to-implant contact ratio in the rabbit tibia vol.3, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2011.3.2.76
  3. The relationship between implant stability quotient values and implant insertion variables: a clinical study vol.39, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02255.x