The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

DEGREE OF CONVERSION OF BIS-ACRYLIC BASED PROVISIONAL CROWN AND FIXED PARTIAL DENTURE MATERIALS

  • Kim, Sung-Hun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Watts, David C. (Biomaterials Research Group, University of Manchester School of Dentistry and Photon Science Institute, UK)
  • Published : 2008.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The degree of conversion may influence the ultimate mechanical and physical properties of provisional crown and fixed partial denture materials. The high levels of the unreacted residual monomer may cause deleterious effect on the properties. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure the degree of conversion of bis-acrylic based provisional crown and fixed partial denture materials by using an infrared spectroscopic method. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Chemically activated three bis-acrylic based provisional crown and fixed partial denture materials, LuxaTemp [DMG, Hamburg, Germany], fast set TemPhase [Kerr, Orange, CA, USA] and Protemp 3 Garant [3M-ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA], were investigated by Fourier transform infrared spectrometry (FTIR). The FTIR spectra of the materials tested were immediately obtained after mixing. The specimens were stored under dry conditions and at $23^{\circ}C$ for 24 hours, and then the spectra of the materials were also obtained. The degree of conversion (%) was calculated from the spectrum of the absorbance between the aliphatic double bond at 1637 $cm^{-1}$ and the aromatic double bond at 1608 $cm^{-1}$ using the baseline method. The data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and the multiple comparison Scheffe test at the significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: The mean value and standard deviation of the degree of conversion were 52.5 % ${\pm}$ 1.1 %, 50.3 % ${\pm}$ 0.8 %, and 42.3 % ${\pm}$ 4.9 % for LuxaTemp, Protemp 3 Garant and fast set TemPhase, respectively. There was no significant difference between LuxaTemp and Protemp 3 Garant, whereas there was a statistically difference between Protemp 3 Garant and fast set TemPhase, and LuxaTemp and fast set TemPhase (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The degree of conversion of fast set TemPhase was significantly lower than those of the others. The degree of conversion may be correlated with the rate of polymerization.

Keywords

References

  1. Barron DJ, Rueggeberg FA, Schuster GS. A comparison of monomer conversion and inorganic filler content in visible light-cured denture resins. Dent Mater 1992;8:874-7
  2. Asmussen E. Restorative resins. Hardness and strength vs. quantity of remaining double bonds. Scand J Dent Res 1982;90:484-9
  3. Asmussen E. Factors affecting the quantity of remaining double bonds in restorative resin polymers. Scand J Dent Res 1982;90:490-6
  4. Bradford EW. Case of allergy to methyl-methacrylae. Br Dent J 1948;84:195
  5. Stungis TE, Fink JN. Hypersensitivity to acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent 1969;22:425-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(69)90209-1
  6. Giunta JL, Grauer I, Zablotsky N. Allergic contact stomatitis caused by acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:188-90 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(79)90173-2
  7. Ali A, Bates JF, Reynolds AJ, Walker DM. The burning mouth sensation related to the wearing of acrylic dentures: an investigation. Br Dent J 1986;161:444-7 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4806008
  8. Weaver RE, Goebel WM. Reactions to acrylic resin dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43:138-42 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(80)90176-6
  9. Ruyter IE, Gyorosi PP. An infrared spectroscopic study of sealants. Scand J Dent Res 1976;84:396-400
  10. Smith DC. Acrylic denture base. Residual monomer. Br Dent J 1958;105:86-91
  11. Austin AT, Basker RM. The level of residual monomers in acrylic denture base materials. Br Dent J 1980;149:281-6 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4804511
  12. Dogam A, Bek B, Cevik NN, Usanmaz A. The effect of preparation conditions of acrylic denture base materials on the level of residual monomer, mechanical properties and water adsorption. J Dent 1995;23:313-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(94)00002-W
  13. Koda T, Tsuchiya H, Yamauchi M, Hoshino Y, Takagi N, Kawano J. High-performance liquid chromatographic estimation of elutes from denture base polymers. J Dent 1989;17:84-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(89)90137-1
  14. Vallittu PK, Miettinium V, Alakuijala P. Residual monomer content and its release into water from denture base materials. Dent Mater 1995;11:338-42 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80031-X
  15. Shim JS, Watts DC. Residual monomer concentration in denture-base acrylic resin after an additional, soft-liner, heat-cure cycle. Dent Mater 1999;15:296-300 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00048-2
  16. Lamb DJ, Ellis B, Priestley D. The effects of process variables on levels of residual monomer in autopolymerizing dental acrylic resin. J Dent 1983;11:80-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(83)90051-9
  17. Smith DC, Bains MED. The detection and estimation of residual monomer in polymethyl methacrylate. J Dent Res 1956;35:16-24 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345560350010901
  18. Antonucci JM, Toth EE. Extent of polymerization of dental resins by differential scanning calorimetry. J Dent Res 1983;23:704-7
  19. Miyazaki K, Horibe TJ. Polymerization of multifunctional methacrylates and acrylates. J Biomed Mater Res 1988;22:1011-22 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820221105
  20. Chung KH, Sharma B, Greener EH. Polymerization kinetics in dental acrylics. Dent Mater 1986;2:275-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(86)80042-2
  21. Eliades GC, Vougiouklakis GJ, Caputo AA. Degree of double bond conversion in light-cured composites. Dent Mater 1987;3:19-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(87)80055-6
  22. Rueggeberg FA. Determination of resin cure using infrared analysis without an internal standard. Dent Mater 1994;10:282-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90076-0
  23. Duray SJ, Gilbert JL, Lautenschlager EP. Comparison of chemical analysis of residual monomer in a chemical-cured dental acrylic material to an FTIR method. Dent Mater 1997;3:240-5
  24. Ferracane JL, Greener EH. Fourier transform infrared analysis of degree of polymerization in unfilled resins- Methods comparison. J Dent Res 1984;63:1093-5 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630081901
  25. Silikas N, Eliades G, Watts DC. Light intensity effects on resin-composite degree of conversion and shrinkage strain. Dent Mater 2000;16:292-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00020-8
  26. Stansbury JW, Dickens SH. Determination of double bond conversion in dental resins by near infrared spectroscopy. Dent Mater 2001;17:71-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00062-2
  27. Venhovan BAM, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Polymerization contraction and conversion of light-curing Bis-GMA-based methacrylate resins. Biomaterials 1993;14:871-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(93)90010-Y
  28. Rathbun MA, Craig RG, Hanks CT, Filisko FE. Cytotoxicity of a Bis-GMA dental composite before and after leaching in organic solvents. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:443-57 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820250403

Cited by

  1. ATR technique, an appropriate method for determining the degree of conversion in dental giomers vol.27, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/27/12/124008
  2. Biomedical photopolymers in 3D printing vol.26, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-10-2018-0268