상아질에 대한 자가 접착 레진 시멘트의 전단결합강도에 관한 연구

The study of shear bond strength of a self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin

  • 인희선 (원광대학교 치과대학 보철학교실.원광치의학 연구소) ;
  • 박종일 (원광대학교 치과대학 보철학교실.원광치의학 연구소) ;
  • 최종인 (원광대학교 치과대학 보철학교실.원광치의학 연구소) ;
  • 조혜원 (원광대학교 치과대학 보철학교실.원광치의학 연구소) ;
  • 동진근 (원광대학교 치과대학 보철학교실.원광치의학 연구소)
  • In, Hee-Sun (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Park, Jong-Il (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Choi, Jong-In (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Cho, Hye-Won (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Dong, Jin-Keun (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Wonkwang University)
  • 발행 : 2008.10.31

초록

최근의 레진 접착시스템은 단계를 줄이고 적용과정을 간편화시키는데 주력하고 있으며, 치면에 bonding 및 conditioning 과정 없이 바로 적용 가능한, one-step의 새로운 자가 접착 레진시멘트 (self-adhesive resin luting cement)들이 소개되어 임상에 사용되고 있다. 이에 본 연구의 목적은 자가 접착 레진시멘트와 기존의 레진시멘트의 상아질에 대한 전단 결합 강도를 비교해보고, 자가 접착 레진시멘트 적용시 치면의 식각 처리 여부가 전단 결합 강도에 미치는 영향에 관하여 알아보고자 하는 것이다. 본 연구를 위해 최근 6개월 내 발치된 비교적 건전한 성인의 대구치 45개를 아크릴릭 레진으로 매몰한 다음, 800 grit SiC연마지로 연마를 시행하여 상아질을 노출시켰다. 15개의 치아를 한 군으로 하여, 세 가지 실험군으로 분류하였다. Group 1) 치면에 아무런 전처리 없이 RelyX Unicem 접착. Group 2) 치면에 인산 산부식 처리 후, RelyX Unicem 접착, Group 3) 치면에 Syntac primet + Syntac adhesive + Heliobond 처리 후 Variolink II 접착. 전처리가 완료된 치아 시편 위에 플라스틱 튜브 (직경 3 mm, 높이 3 mm)를 고정한 다음, 제조사의 지시에 따라 각 레진 시멘트를 혼합하여 링 안을 채우고, 광중합을 시행하였다. 접착이 완료된 시편은 $37^{\circ}C$ 항온수조 (증류수)에서 24시간 동안 보관 후, 만능 시험기를 이용하여 1mm/min의 cross head speed로 결합강도를 측정하였으며, 확대경 하에서 파절 양상을 분류 관찰하고, 주사전자현미경을 이용하여 미세구조를 관찰하였다. 측정결과는 SPSS WIN 12.0 프로그램을 사용하여 분석하였으며 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. RelyX Unicem의 상아질에 대한 전단결합강도는 Variolink II와 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 2. 상아질에 대한 인산 산부식 처리는 RelyX Unicem과의 전단결합강도를 낮게 하였다. 3. RelyX Unicem과 Variolink II에서는 혼합 파절의 비율이 컸으며, 전단결합강도가 낮았던 인산 산부식 처리 후 RelyX Unicem을 접착한 경우에서는 전체 시편에서 접착성 파절이 관찰되었다. 결론으로 말하면, 자가 접착 레진시멘트와 기존의 레진시멘트의 상아질에 대한 전단결합강도는 유의한 차이를 보이지 않으며, 인산 산부식 처리는 상아질에 대한 자가 접착 레진시멘트의 전단결합강도를 감소시킨다.

Purpose: The objective of this study was to compare the bonding characteristics of a new self-adhesive resin cement to dentin, which does not require bonding and conditioning procedure of the tooth surface, and conventional resin cement. The effect of phosphoric acid etching prior to application of self-adhesive resin cement on the shear bond strength was also evaluated. Material and methods: Fortyfive non-carious human adult molars extracted within 6 months were embedded in chemically cured acrylic resin. The teeth were ground with a series of SiC-papers ending with 800 grit until the flat dentin surfaces of the teeth were exposed. The teeth were randomly divided into 3 experimental groups. In group 1, self-adhesive resin cement, RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) was bonded without any conditioning of teeth. In group 2, RelyX Unicem was bonded to teeth after phosphoric acid etching. For group 3, Syntac Primer (Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein) was applied to the teeth before Syntac adhesive (Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein) and Helibond (Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein) followed by conventional resin cement, Variolink II (Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein). To make a shear bond strength test model, a plastic tuble (3 mm diameter, 3 mm height) was applied to the dentin surfaces at a right angle and filled it with respective resin cement, and light-polymerized for 40 seconds. All the specimens were stored in distilled water at $37^{\circ}C$ for 24 hours before test. Universal Testing Machine (Z020, Zwick, Ulm, Germany) at a cross head speed of 1 mm/min was used to evaluate the shear bond strength. The failure sites were inspected under a magnifier and Scanning Electron Microscope. The data was analyzed with One way ANOVA and Scheffe test at ${\alpha}$= 0.05. Results: (1) The shear bond strengths to dentin of RelyX Unicem was not significantly different from those of Variolink II/Syntac. (2) Phosphoric acid etching lowered the shear bond strength of RelyX Unicem significantly. (3) Most of RelyX Unicem and Variolink II showed mixed fractures, while all the specimens of RelyX Unicem with phosphoric acid etching demonstrated adhesive failure between dentin and resin cement. Conclusion: Shear bond strength to dentin of self-adhesive resin cement is not significantly different from conventional resin cement, and phosphoric acid etching decrease the shear bond strength to dentin of self-adhesive resin cement.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Probster L. Survival rate of In-Ceram restoration. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:259-63
  2. Tjan AH, Dunn JR, Grant BE. Marginal leakage of cast gold crowns luted with an adhesive resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:11-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90039-D
  3. Anusavice KJ. Phillips science of dental materials.11th ed. Saunders, Missouri, USA, 2003;443-94
  4. Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Hughie ML, Brown JS. Comparison of shear bond strengths of two resin luting systems for a base and a high noble metal alloy bonded to enamel. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:457-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90114-7
  5. Groten M, Probster L. The influence of different cementation modes on the fracture resistance of feldspathic ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:169-77
  6. Eden GT, Kacicz JM. Dicor crownstrength improvement due to bonding (abstract). J Dent Res 1987;66:207
  7. Roulet JF, Soderholm KJ, Longmate J. Effects of treatment and storage conditions on ceramic/composite bond strength. J Dent Res 1995;74:381-7 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740011501
  8. Stangel I, Nathanson D, Hsu CS. Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain. J Dent Res 1987;66:1460-5 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660091001
  9. Gerth HU, Dammaschke T, Zuchner H, Schafer E. Chemical analysis and bonding reaction of RelyX Unicem and Bifix composites - A comparative study. Dent Mater J 2006;22:934-41 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.10.004
  10. 3M ESPE. Wissenschaftliches Produktdossier RelyX Unicem. 3M ESPE AG, 82229 Seefeld, Germany
  11. Timmons S, Cobb D, Stanford C, Dawson D, Denehy J, Vargas M. Post-operative sensitivity of bonded ceramic posterior inlays and onlays. J Dent Res 2004;83 (Spec Iss A):1538
  12. Cobb D, Timmons S, Stanford C, Dawson D, Denehy G, Vargas M. Clinical outcomes of ceramic inlays/ onlays luted with two bonding systems. J Dent Res 2004;83 (Spec Iss A):1539
  13. Benelli EM, Serra MC, Rodrigues AL Jr, Cury JA. In situ anticariogenic potential of glass ionomer cement. Caries Res 1993;27:280-4 https://doi.org/10.1159/000261551
  14. Technical data sheet : Espertise RelyX Unicem (2002) 3M ESPE, seefeld Germany
  15. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Regnet T, Lang R, Handle G. Marginal adaptation in dentin of a self-adhesive universal resin cement compared with well-tried systems. Dent Mater J 2004;20:191-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00091-5
  16. Piwowarczyk A, Laucer HC, Sorensen JA. In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:265-73 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.027
  17. de Souza Costa CA, Hebling J, Randall RC.Human pulp response to resin cements used to bond inlay restorations. Dent Mater J 2006;22:954-62 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.10.007
  18. Platt JA. Resin cements into the 21st century. CompCont Edue Dent 1999;20:1173-88
  19. White SN, Sorensen JA, Kang SK, Caputo AA. Microleakage of new crown and fixed Partial denture luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:156-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90447-I
  20. Kramer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent 2000;13:60-76
  21. Hasegawa EA, Boyer DB, Chan DC. Hardening of dualcared cements under composite resin inlays. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:187-92 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80046-0
  22. Abo-Hamar SE, Hiller KA, Jung H, Federlin M, Friedl KH, Schmalz G. Bond strength of a new universal self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin and enamel. Clin Oral Investig 2005;9:161-7 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-005-0308-5
  23. De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2004;20:963-71 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.03.002
  24. Walter R, Miguez PA, Pereira PN. Microtensile bond strength of luting materialsto coronal and root dentin. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005;17:165-71 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2005.tb00107.x
  25. Yang B, Ludwig K, Adelung R, Kern M. Micro- tensile bond strength of three luting resins to human regional dentin. Dent Mater 2006;22:45-56 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.009
  26. Escribano N, de la Macorra JC. Microtensile bond strength of self -adhesive luting cements to ceramic. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:337-41
  27. Kececi AD, Ureyen Kaya B, Adanir N. Micro push-out bond strengths of four fiber-reinforced composite post systems and 2 luting materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:121-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.07.011
  28. erdigao J, Lambrechts P, van Meerbeek B, Tome AR, Vanherle G, Lopes AB. Morphological field emission- SEM study of the effect of six phosphoric acid etching agents on human dentin. Dent Mater J 1996;12:262-71 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80033-9
  29. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM. Dentin permeability and dentin adhesion. J Dent 1997;25:355-72 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00057-7
  30. DW Kim, SJ Park, GK Choi. Compatibility of self-etching dentin adhesives with resin luting cements. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 2005;30:493-504 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.6.493
  31. Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Denehy GE. Interfacial micromorphology and shear bond strength of single-bottle primer/ adhesives. Dent Mater 1997;13:316-24 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80102-9
  32. Hikita K, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Ikeda T, Van Landuyt K, Maida T, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2007;23:71-80 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.12.002