Journal of Engineering Education Research (공학교육연구)

Korean Society for Engineering Education (한국공학교육학회)
권호 표지

Exploration on Teaching and Learning Strategies through Analyzing Cases of Foreign Engineering Education

해외 공학교육 사례분석을 통한 교수학습 전략 탐색

  • Kwon, Sung-Ho (Department of Educational Technology, Hanyang University) ;
  • Shin, Dong-Wook (Division of Materials Science Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kang, Kyung-Hee (The College of General Studies, Hanyang University)
  • Published : 2008.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore teaching and learning strategies through analyzing cases of foreign engineering education. With the analysis criteria composed of engineering education model, teaching and learning method, evaluation strategy, and technology supporting strategy, 10 foreign colleges of engineering in 5 countries were examined and analyzed. Teaching and learning strategies deduced from analysis state as follows. First of all, it need to develop engineering education models that reform should be made in systematic approach to teaching and learning, workplaces and laboratories, evaluation, technology support, etc. Secondly, the strategy for teaching and learning recommends supporting student directed learning, active learning participation, and collaboration learning by inductive learning strategies such as problem based learning, inquiry learning, project based learning, studio based learning, and blended learning. Thirdly, the evaluation strategy suggests that evaluation should be made to reflect students' learning and facilitate continuous learning based current learning results while it is necessary to build up a whole evaluation system. Finally, it is the educational technology approach for systematic engineering education that is required considering that many foreign colleges of engineering have reformed engineering education through technology supporting systems and are maximizing research and education in connection with other universities. This study is expected to contribute as preliminary data in developing further teaching and learning models and strategies for nurturing engineering students.

본 연구의 목적은 해외 공학교육 사례 분석을 통해 공학교육의 교수학습 전략을 탐색하는 것이다. 이를 위해 해외 공과 대학 중 5개 국가 10개 공과대학 사례를 조사하였다. 사례 분석 준거로는 공학교육모델, 교수학습 방법, 평가 방법 및 전략, 테크놀로지 지원전략이었다. 사례 분석 결과 도출된 교수학습 전략은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 교수학습의 개혁, 작업실과 실험실, 평가 개혁 등 교육 전반에 대한 시스템적 접근이 이루어져야하며, 이를 위한 공학교육의 교수학습 모델이 필요하다. 둘째, 구체적인 수업 전략으로는 문제중심학습, 탐구학습, 프로젝트중심학습, 스튜디오기반학습, 블렌디드 러닝 등과 같이 귀납적 접근 학습전략을 사용하여 학습자의 자기주도적인 학습과 적극적인 학습참여, 협력학습 등을 지원하여야 한다. 셋째, 교수학습의 결과를 평가함에 있어서도 학습의 과정을 성찰하고 지속적인 학습을 촉진하기 위한 평가가 이루어져야 하며 이에 맞는 평가 시스템 구축이 필요하다. 넷째, 테크놀로지 지원 환경을 활용한 공학교육이 필요하며, 구축된 공학 교육시스템은 타 대학과의 연계를 통해 연구와 교육의 효율을 배가시킬 수 있는 교육공학적 접근이 필요하다. 본 연구는 공학 교육의 교수학습 모형 및 전략 개발에 기초 자료가 될 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강소연 외(2005). 공학교육에서의 PBL 수업의 효과 연구, 공학교육연구, 8(2), 24-34
  2. 강정하․최인수(2006). 창의적 문제해결력 프로그램이 대학생의 창의적 문제해결 성향과 수행 능력에 미치는 효과, 교육심리연구, 20(3). 679-701
  3. 김영정․정상준(2005). 소크라테스의 문답법과 비판적 사고. 자연과 문명의 조화, 53(5), 91-96
  4. 정현철․윤초희(2005). 과학영재의 자율연구능력에 영향을 미치는 교수전략탐색 및 교수학습모형개발연구. 한국교육개발원 연구보고서
  5. Aller, B, M, et al. (2005). WeBAL: A web-based assessment library to enhance teaching and learning in engineering. IEEE Transactions on education, 48(4)
  6. Bankel, J. et al.(2002). The CDIO syllabus : A Comparative study of expected student proficiency
  7. Brodeur, D. M, et al. (2002). International collaboration in the reform of engineering education. Proceedings of the 2002 American society for engineering education
  8. Downey, G., et al.(2006). The globally competent engineer: Working effectively with people who define problems differently. Journal of Engineering Education. April 2006
  9. Dym, C., et al (2005). Engineering Design thinking, teaching and learning. Journal of Engineering Education. 103-120
  10. Eggermont, M., Freiheit, T. & Brennan, R.(2006) An inquiry and blended learning module for senior engineering design
  11. Online: http://www.cden2006.utoronto.ca/data/10056. pdf
  12. Foulds, R. A., Bergen, M. & Mantilla, B. A. (2003). Integrated biomedical engineering education using studio-based learning. IEEE Engineering in medicine and biology magazine, 92-100
  13. Glatz, C. E., et al.(2005). Problem-based learning biotechnology courses in chemical engineering. Online: http://www.aseanbiotechnology.info/ Abstract/21018717.pdf
  14. GoodHew, P. J & Bullough, T. J(2005). Active learning in materials science and engineering. 1st annual CDIO conference
  15. Isaksen, S. G., Dorval, K. B., & Treffinger, D. J. (2000). Creative approaches to problem solving: A framework for change. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company
  16. Meyer(2005). Capstone design outcome assessment: Instruments for quantitative evaluation. 35th ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference
  17. Paretti, M.(2005). Using project portfolios to assess design in materials science and engineering. Proceedings of the 2005 American society for engineering education annual conference & exposition
  18. Paretti, M. & Burgoyne.(2005). Integrating engineering and communication : A study of capstone design course. 35th ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference
  19. Prince, M. J. & Felder, R. M.(2007). The many faces of inductive teaching and learning. Journal of college science teaching, 36(5), p14-20
  20. Prince, M. J., Felder, R. M.(2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123-138 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x
  21. Saunders, K., et al..(2003). Using rubrics to facilitate students' development of problem solving skills. Proceedings of the 2003 American society for engineering education annual conference & exposition
  22. 藤田 喜久雄(2004). 創成敎育と設計工學. 日本機械學會 2004年度年次大會講演資料集(8)
  23. 藤田 喜久雄(2005). 設計からみた工學創成敎育の課題. 日本機械學會 2005年度年次大會講演資料集(8)
  24. CDIO model : http://ww.cdio.org
  25. Virginia Tech, Department of Engineering Education : http://www.enge.vt.edu/main/index. php
  26. University of Virginia, Biomedical Engineering : http://bme.virginia.edu/capstone/
  27. New Jersey Institute of Technology, Department of Biomedical engineering : http://biomedical. njit.edu/
  28. Osaka University, Department of Mechanical Engineering : http://www.mech.eng.osaka-u. ac.jp/
  29. University of Liverpool : http://www.liv.ac.uk/ engdept/ug_programmes/index.htm
  30. Iowa University, College of Engineering, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering : http://www3.cbe.iastate.edu/
  31. Purdue University https://engineering.purdue.edu/ ECE
  32. Virginia technology : http://www.mse.vt.edu/ communications/index.htm
  33. WeBAL : http://www.wmich.edu/engineer/webal/ webal.htm
  34. MIT's reform through the technology : http:// web.mit.edu/edtech/home.html
  35. SMA : http://web.mit.edu/sma/