Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Interactive Information Retrieval (IR) Models: Tradition and Development

인터액티브 정보검색 모형

  • Published : 2007.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper is divided into two parts. The first part elaborates on four Information Retrieval (IR) models: a traditional IR model and three more recent, user-oriented models of It interaction presented by Belkin, Ingwersen, and Saracevic. The strengths and limitations of each model are discussed. The second part, based on an analysis of the previous models, presents the author's interactive model, namely, the Iceberg Model. The rationales that are given to explain the design of this model are associated with the following: a greater specificity of system attributes; more concrete interplays among different components of IR interaction; and, the increased role of the Human Information Intermediary (HII). In sum, the new model presents a framework that can evolve in varying information-seeking contexts.

본 논문은 다음과 같은 두 부분으로 구성된다. 논문의 전반부는 네 개의 정보검색 모형을 다루고 있는데 이는 전통적 정보검색 모형과 보다 최근에 나온 세 연구자의 이용자 중심 인터액티브 모형을 포함한다. 인터액티브 정보검색 모형은 Belkin, Ingwersen, 그리고 Saracevic에 의하여 제시된 것인데, 전통적 정보검색 모형을 포함한 각 모형의 장점과 한계점이 기술된다. 논문의 후반부에서 저자는 이상과 같은 모형들에 관한 분석을 토대로 그 자신의 인터액티브 모형, 즉 빙산모형(Iceberg Model)을 제시하고 있다. 빙산모형의 타당성으로 다음과 같은 세 가지 사항을 강조하고 있는데, 즉, 보다 구체화된 시스템 특성의 포함, 보다 명확한 인터액티브 정보검색 요소간의 상호작용, 그리고 정보매개자의 증가된 역할 등이 그것이다. 요약하면, 빙산모형은 변화하는 정보추구환경에서 진화할 수 있는 틀을 제시하고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Barry, C. 1994. 'User-defined relevance criteria: An exploratory study.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(3): 149-159 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199404)45:3<149::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-J
  2. Bates, M. J. 1989. 'The Design of Browsing and Berrypicking Techniques for the Online Search Interface.' Online Review, 13: 407-424 https://doi.org/10.1108/eb024320
  3. Belkin, N. J. 1980. 'Anomalous states of knowledge as the basis for information retrieval.' Canadian Journal of Information Science, 5: 133-143
  4. Belkin, N. J. 1993. 'Interaction with texts: Information retrieval as infor mation-seeking behavior.' Information Retrieval, 10: 55-66. Von der Modelierung zur Anwerdung. Konstanz, Germany: Universitaetsverlag
  5. Belkin, N. J., Cool, C., Stein, A., & Thiel, U. 1995. 'Cases, scripts, and infor mation seeking strategies: On the design of interactive information retrieval systems.' Expert Systems with Application, 9(3): 379-395 https://doi.org/10.1016/0957-4174(95)00011-W
  6. Borlund, P. 2000a. Evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Ph. D. diss., Akademi University
  7. Borlund, P. 2000b. 'Experimental Components for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems.' Journal of Documentation 56(1): 71-90 https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007110
  8. Borlund, P. & Ingwersen, P. 1997. "The development of a method for the evaluation of interactive infor mation retrieval systems." Journal of Documentation, 53(3): 225-250 https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007198
  9. Croft, W. B. & Thompson, R. H. 1987. 'I3R: A new approach to the design of document retrieval systems.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 38(6): 389-404 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198711)38:6<389::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-4
  10. Dervin, B. 1980. 'Communication Gaps and Inequities: Moving toward a Reconceptualization.' In B Dervin & M. Voigt (Ed.), Progress in Communication Sciences: Volume 2. Norwood, NJ: Ablex: 73-112
  11. Dervin, B. 1983. An overview of sense making research: Concepts, methods, and results to date. Seattle, WA: School of Communication, University of Washington
  12. Dervin, B., & Nilan, M. 1986. 'Information needs and uses.' In M. Williams (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 21: 3-33
  13. Eisenberg, M. B. & Berkowitz, R. E. 1990. Information Problem Solving: The Big Six Skills Approach to Library and Information Skills Instruction. Ablex Publishing Corporation: Norwood, NJ
  14. Green, R. 1997. 'The role of relational structures in indexing for the humanities.' Knowledge Organization, 24(2): 72-83
  15. Ingwersen, P. 1992. Information retrieval interaction. London: Taylor Graham
  16. Ingwersen, P. 1996. 'Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction: Elements of a cognitive IR theory.' Journal of Documentation, 52(1): 3-50 https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026960
  17. Ingwersen, P. 2001a. 'Users in context.' In: M. Agosti, F. Crestani, F and G. Pasi (Ed,) Lectures on Information Retrieval. Bonn: Springer Verlag: 157-178
  18. Ingwersen, P. 2001b. 'Cognitive Information Retrieval.' In M. Williams (Ed,), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34: 3-52
  19. Ingwersen, P. 2002. 'Cognitive perspectives of document representation.' In: R. Fidel, H. Bruce, P. Ingwersen, and p. Vakkari, (Ed,) Emerging Framewor ks and Methods - Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS 4), Seattle, July, 2002. Colorado: Libraries Unlimited, 2002: 285-300
  20. Kim, Y. 2003a. 'Typology of ambiguity on representation of information problem: An exploratory study.' Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society of Information Science and Technology: 366-380
  21. Kim, Y. 2003b. 'User-oriented represen tation of documents for Interactive IR: Connecting beyond-topical criteria of user-defined relevance with the surrogate features of an IR database.' Presented at 2003 Joint American Society of Indexers (ASI) - Indexing and Abstracting Society of Canada (lASC/SCAD) Annual Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  22. Krikelas, J. 1983. 'Information-seeking behavior: Patterns and concepts.' Drexel Library Quarterly, 19(2): 5-20
  23. Kuhlthau, C. C. 1988a. 'Developing a Model of the Library Search Process: Investigation of Cognitive and Affective Aspects.' Reference Quarterly, 28: 232-242
  24. Kuhlthau, C. C. 1988b. "Longitudinal Case Studies of the Information Search Process of Users in Libraries." Library and Information Science, 10: 251-304
  25. Larsen, B. 2002. 'Exploiting citation overlaps for Information Retrieval: generating a boomerang effect from the network of scientific papers.' Scientometrics, 54(2): 155-178 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016011326300
  26. Leckie, G. L., Pettigrew, K. E. & Sylvain, C. 1996. 'Modeling the information seeking of professionals: A general model derived from research on engineers, health care professionals and lawyers.' Library Quarterly, 66: 161-193 https://doi.org/10.1086/602864
  27. Oddy, R. N. 1977. 'Information retrieval through man-machine dialogue.' Journal of Documentation, 33(1): 1-14 https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026631
  28. Park, T. K. 1993. 'The Nature of Relevance in Information Retrieval: An Empirical Study.' Library Quarterl, 63(3): 318-351 https://doi.org/10.1086/602592
  29. Park, T. K. 1994. 'Toward a Theory of UserBased Relevance: A Call for a New Paradigm of Inquiry.' Journal of the American Society for Infonmation Science, 45(3): 135-141 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199404)45:3<135::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-1
  30. Saracevic, T. 1996. 'Modeling interaction in information retrieval (IR): A review and proposal.' Proceedings of the 59th ASIS Annual Meeting, 33: 3-9
  31. Saracevic, T. 1997. 'The stratified model of information retrieval interaction: Extension and applications.' Proceedings of the 60th ASIS Annual Meeting, 34: 313-327
  32. Saracevic, T. 1999. 'Information science.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12): 1051-1063 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:12<1051::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-Z
  33. Schamber, L., Eisenberg, M. B., & Nilan, M. S. 1990. 'A re-examination of relevance: Toward a dynamic, situational deflnition.' Information Processing and Management 26(6): 755-776 https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(90)90050-C
  34. Spink, A. 1997. 'Study of Interactive Feedback during Mediated Information Retrieval.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(5): 382-394 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199705)48:5<382::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-R
  35. Taylor, R. S. 1968. 'Questions-negotiation and information seeking in libraries.' College and Research Libraries, 29: 178-194 https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_29_03_178
  36. Wang, P., Hawk, W. B., & Tenopir, C. 2000. 'Users' interaction with World Wide Web resources: An exploratory study using a holistic approach.' Information Processing & Management, 36(2): 229-251 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(99)00059-X
  37. Wang, P., & Soergel, D. 1998. 'A cognitive model of document use during a research project: Study 1. Document selection.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(2): 115-133 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199802)49:2<115::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-T
  38. Wilson, T. D. 1981. 'On user studies and information needs.' Journal of Documentation, 37(1): 3-15 https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026702
  39. Wilson, T. D. 1999. 'Models in information behavior research.' Journal of Documentation, 55(3): 249-270 https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007145