Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지

Retrospective studies of dental implant placement at each intraoral site and situation

임플란트 식립 유형에 따른 후향적 연구

  • Hong, Ji-Youn (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University, College of Dentistry) ;
  • Chae, Gyung-Joon (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University, College of Dentistry) ;
  • Jung, Ui-Won (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University, College of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Sung (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University, College of Dentistry) ;
  • Cho, Kyoo-Sung (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University, College of Dentistry) ;
  • Chae, Jung-Kiu (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University, College of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Chong-Kwan (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University, College of Dentistry) ;
  • Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University, College of Dentistry)
  • 홍지연 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 채경준 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 정의원 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 김창성 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 조규성 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 채중규 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 김종관 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 최성호 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소)
  • Published : 2007.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Developments in micro/macrostructures of implants and surgical techniques brought out stable outcomes of implant dentistry. The aim of this study was to evaluate the distributions of implant patients, the types of implanted sites, and the success or survival rates of various implant systems and to analyze the implant placement done at each specificintraoral site and situation. Materials and Methods: The data of dental implantations collected between 1992 and 2006 at the Department of Periodontology in 00000 University Hospital were analyzed. Results: 1. Largest part of the patients were at the age of 40s and 50s in bothgender who lost their teeth mostly by periodontaldiseases and caries at the posterior intraoral sites as major ones. Bone densities of type II(mandible) and III(maxilla) were likely to be seen with quantity of type B. Lengths of the implants between 10 and 15 mm and wide platform took the largest part. 2. Survival rates of $Implantium^{(R)}(98.8%)$, $Xive^{(R)}(100%)$ and ITI $TE^{(R)}(100%)$ were high when $Frialit-2^{(R)}$ showed 82%(poor bone density area) or 87.2%(combined with additional therapy). $IMZ^{(R)}$ had lowest cumulative survival(67.5%) and success rate(49.4%) amongst all. 3. Replacement with 2 wide or 3 regular platforms showed no significant differences in survival rate and marginal bone loss atmandibular posterior area. In single restoration of mandibular second molar, 5-year success rate of machined surface $Br{\aa}nemark^{(R)}(70.37%)$ was lower than that of rough surface $ITI^{(R)}$ SLA(100%). 4. Replacement of single tooth in anterior area showed high survival rate of 94.5%. 5. The success rates of $Br{\aa}nemark$ Ti-Unite and ITI SLA at posterior maxilla with poor bone density both showed stable outcomes. 6. 10-year cumulative survival rate of implants with maxillary sinus augmentation by lateral window approach appeared to be 96.60%. Low survival rate(75%) was shown when there were more than two complications combined. Height of grafted bone remained stable above the implant apex. Conclusions : Rough surfaced implants showed stable outcomes in most of the situation including poor bone density and additional therapy combined.

Keywords

References

  1. Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3(2):81-100 https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316909036699
  2. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone anchorage in man. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 1981;52:155-170 https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776
  3. Martinez H, Davarpanah M, Missika P, Celletti R, Lazzara R. Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:423-432 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120501.x
  4. Atwood DA. Postextraction changes in the adult mandible as illustrated by microradiographs of midsagital sections and serial cephalometric roentgenograms. J Prosthet Dent 1963;13:810-824 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(63)90225-7
  5. Lekholm U, Zarb G, Branemark PI. Tissue integrated prostheses osseointegration in clinical dentistry, Chicago, Quintessence, 1985:199-209
  6. Albrektsson T, Sennerby L. State of the art in oral implants. J of Clin Periodon 1991;18:474-481 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02319.x
  7. Eckert SE, Parein A, Myshin HL, Padilla JL. Validation of dental implant systems through a review of the literature supplied by system manufacturers. J of Prosthet Dent 1997;77:271-279 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70184-7
  8. Carlsson L, Rostlund T, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson. T. Removal torques for polished and rough titanium implants. Int J of Oral and Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:21-24
  9. Ivanoff CJ, Widmark G, Hallgren C, Sennerby L, Wennerberg A. Histologic evaluation of the bone integration of $TiO_2$ blasted and turned titanium microimplants in humans. Clin Oral Imp Res 2001;12:128-134 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002128.x
  10. Cutler SJ, Ederer F Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival. J Chronic Dis 1958;8(6):699-712 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(58)90126-7
  11. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants : a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1(1):11-25
  12. Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990 Dec;1(1):33-40 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010105.x
  13. 홍성재, 백정원, 조규성 등. 임플란트 환자의 유형 및 분포에 대한 연구. 대한치주과학회지 2002;32(3) :539-554
  14. 박지은, 윤정호, 최성호 등. 임플란트 환자의 분포 및 식립부 유형. 대한치주과학회지 2004;34(4): 819-836
  15. 김영택, 채경준, 최성호 등. 임플란트 환자의 유형 및 분포에 대한 연구. 대한구강악안면 임플란트학회지 2006;10(2):4-20
  16. Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Branemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:104-111 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030302.x
  17. Schwartz Z, Martin JY, Dean DD et al. Effect of titanium surface roughness on chondrocyte proliferation, matrix production and differentiation depends upon the state of cell maturation. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;30:145-155 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199602)30:2<145::AID-JBM3>3.0.CO;2-R
  18. Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxland T et al. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acidetched surface : a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;45:75-83 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199905)45:2<75::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-P
  19. Cochran DL. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces. J Periodontol 1999;70:1523-1539 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1999.70.12.1523
  20. 채경준, 정의원, 최성호 등. 상악에 식립된 Frialit-2 임플란트의 성공률에 대한 후향적 연구. 대한치주과학회지 2005;35(2):449-460
  21. 장인권, 정의원, 최성호 등. 하악에 식립된 Xive implant 환자의 분포 및 식립부 유형과 생존율. 대한치주과학회지 2005;35(2) :437-448
  22. Park JE, Kim TG, Chai JK et al. Long-term evaluation of IMZ implants ; success and survival rates. The Journal of Korean Academy of Periodontology 2005;35(4):1039-1052
  23. Haas R, Mensdorff-Pouilly N, Mailath G, Watzek G. Survival of 1,920 IMZ implants followed for up to 100 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11(5):581-588
  24. Watzek G, Zechner W, Ulm C, Tangl S, Tepper G. Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of three types of dental implants following 18 months of occlusal loading : a preliminary study in baboons. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16(4):408-416 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01155.x
  25. 채경준, 정성민, 김창성 등. $Implantium^\circledR$ implant 의 단기 생존율 및 치유 양상에 대한 연구. 대한치주과학회지 2006;36(3):68:3-691
  26. 서현기, 채경준, 김종관 등. ITI $TE^\circledR$ 임플란트의 생존율에 관한 후향적 연구. 대한치주과학회지 2006;36(3):673-682
  27. 유호선, 소성수, 한동후, 조규성, 문익상. 하악대구치부위의 고정성 보철물에서 2개의 장폭경과 3개의 표준 임플란트의 비교. 대한치주과학회지 2002;32(3):577-588
  28. Jemt T. Modified single and short-span restorations supported by osseointegrated fixtures in the partially edentulous jaw. J Proshtet Dent 1995;73:274-279 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80205-7
  29. 이항빈, 백정원, 조규성 등. 하악 제 1, 2 대구치를 대체하는 단일 임플란트 간의 성공률 비교. 대한치주과학회지 2004;34(1):101-112
  30. 이승문, 채경준, 채중규 등. 하악 구치부에서 ITI SLA (Sand-blasted, Large-grit, Aid-etched) 임플란트를 이용한 단일 치아 수복의 후형적 임상 연구. 대한치주과학회지 2006;36(3):661-671
  31. 임지순, 채경준, 김종관 등. 상악 전치부 단일 임플란트의 생존율에 대한 후향적 연구. 대한치주과학회지 2006;36(3):639-651
  32. Misch CE. Maxillary sinus augmentation for endosseous implants organized alternative treatment plans. Int J Oral Implantol 1987;4:49-58
  33. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980;38(8):613-6
  34. Lee JY, Lee SH, Cho KS et al. A comparison between Branemark Ti-$Unite^{TM}$ implants and ITI SLA implants in soft bone quality(type 4). (submitted to COIR in 2007)
  35. Tatum H Jr. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am 1986; 30:207-229
  36. Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery : the osteotome technique. Compendium 1994;15:152, 154-156
  37. Zitzmann NU, Scharer P. Sinus elevation procedures in the resrobed posterior maxilla. Comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:8-17 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90391-2
  38. Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, Weinstein R. Systemic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24(6):565-577
  39. 홍성배, 채경준, 김종관 등. 상악동 거상술을 이용하여 구치부에 식립된 Branemark Ti-Unite와 ITI SLA 임플란트의 임상적 평가. 대한치주과학회지 2005;35(4):813-822
  40. Kang NW, Jung UW, Kim CS et al. Bone added osteotome sinus floor elevation with simultaneous placement of Branemark Ti-Unite and ITI SLA implants. The Journal of Korean Academy of Periodontology 2005;35(3) :609-621
  41. Hatano N, Shimizu Y, Ooya K. A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 2:1 autogenous bone/ xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:339-345 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00996.x
  42. 연제영, 채경준, 채중규 등. 측방 접근법에 의한 상악동 거상술을 이용하여 식립된 골내 임플란트의 10년간 후향적 연구. (2007 대한치주과학회지 submission 예정)
  43. Fugazzotto PA, Vlassis J. Long-term success of sinus augmentation using various surgical approaches and grafting materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13(1):52-58
  44. 김지선, 이서경, 방은경 등. 상악동 골이식술을 동반한 임플란트 식립 시 골이식재의 높이 변화에 대한 방사선학적 평가. 대한치주과학회지 2007;37(2):277-286
  45. Maiorana C, Sigurta D, Mirandola A, Garlin G, Santoro F. Sinus evaluation with alloplasts or xenogenic materials and implants An up-to-4 year clinical and radiographic follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:426-432
  46. Hallman M, Hedin M, Sennerby L, Lundgren S. A prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite and autogenous bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60:297-284