Browse > Article

Retrospective studies of dental implant placement at each intraoral site and situation  

Hong, Ji-Youn (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University, College of Dentistry)
Chae, Gyung-Joon (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University, College of Dentistry)
Jung, Ui-Won (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University, College of Dentistry)
Kim, Chang-Sung (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University, College of Dentistry)
Cho, Kyoo-Sung (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University, College of Dentistry)
Chae, Jung-Kiu (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University, College of Dentistry)
Kim, Chong-Kwan (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University, College of Dentistry)
Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University, College of Dentistry)
Publication Information
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science / v.37, no.4, 2007 , pp. 805-824 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: Developments in micro/macrostructures of implants and surgical techniques brought out stable outcomes of implant dentistry. The aim of this study was to evaluate the distributions of implant patients, the types of implanted sites, and the success or survival rates of various implant systems and to analyze the implant placement done at each specificintraoral site and situation. Materials and Methods: The data of dental implantations collected between 1992 and 2006 at the Department of Periodontology in 00000 University Hospital were analyzed. Results: 1. Largest part of the patients were at the age of 40s and 50s in bothgender who lost their teeth mostly by periodontaldiseases and caries at the posterior intraoral sites as major ones. Bone densities of type II(mandible) and III(maxilla) were likely to be seen with quantity of type B. Lengths of the implants between 10 and 15 mm and wide platform took the largest part. 2. Survival rates of $Implantium^{(R)}(98.8%)$, $Xive^{(R)}(100%)$ and ITI $TE^{(R)}(100%)$ were high when $Frialit-2^{(R)}$ showed 82%(poor bone density area) or 87.2%(combined with additional therapy). $IMZ^{(R)}$ had lowest cumulative survival(67.5%) and success rate(49.4%) amongst all. 3. Replacement with 2 wide or 3 regular platforms showed no significant differences in survival rate and marginal bone loss atmandibular posterior area. In single restoration of mandibular second molar, 5-year success rate of machined surface $Br{\aa}nemark^{(R)}(70.37%)$ was lower than that of rough surface $ITI^{(R)}$ SLA(100%). 4. Replacement of single tooth in anterior area showed high survival rate of 94.5%. 5. The success rates of $Br{\aa}nemark$ Ti-Unite and ITI SLA at posterior maxilla with poor bone density both showed stable outcomes. 6. 10-year cumulative survival rate of implants with maxillary sinus augmentation by lateral window approach appeared to be 96.60%. Low survival rate(75%) was shown when there were more than two complications combined. Height of grafted bone remained stable above the implant apex. Conclusions : Rough surfaced implants showed stable outcomes in most of the situation including poor bone density and additional therapy combined.
Keywords
retrospective study; dental implant; success rate; survival rate;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 15  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3(2):81-100   DOI
2 Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone anchorage in man. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 1981;52:155-170   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
3 Albrektsson T, Sennerby L. State of the art in oral implants. J of Clin Periodon 1991;18:474-481   DOI
4 Cutler SJ, Ederer F Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival. J Chronic Dis 1958;8(6):699-712   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Branemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:104-111   DOI   ScienceOn
6 이항빈, 백정원, 조규성 등. 하악 제 1, 2 대구치를 대체하는 단일 임플란트 간의 성공률 비교. 대한치주과학회지 2004;34(1):101-112
7 Lee JY, Lee SH, Cho KS et al. A comparison between Branemark Ti-$Unite^{TM}$ implants and ITI SLA implants in soft bone quality(type 4). (submitted to COIR in 2007)
8 Kang NW, Jung UW, Kim CS et al. Bone added osteotome sinus floor elevation with simultaneous placement of Branemark Ti-Unite and ITI SLA implants. The Journal of Korean Academy of Periodontology 2005;35(3) :609-621
9 Zitzmann NU, Scharer P. Sinus elevation procedures in the resrobed posterior maxilla. Comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:8-17   DOI   ScienceOn
10 유호선, 소성수, 한동후, 조규성, 문익상. 하악대구치부위의 고정성 보철물에서 2개의 장폭경과 3개의 표준 임플란트의 비교. 대한치주과학회지 2002;32(3):577-588
11 홍성배, 채경준, 김종관 등. 상악동 거상술을 이용하여 구치부에 식립된 Branemark Ti-Unite와 ITI SLA 임플란트의 임상적 평가. 대한치주과학회지 2005;35(4):813-822
12 연제영, 채경준, 채중규 등. 측방 접근법에 의한 상악동 거상술을 이용하여 식립된 골내 임플란트의 10년간 후향적 연구. (2007 대한치주과학회지 submission 예정)   과학기술학회마을
13 Hallman M, Hedin M, Sennerby L, Lundgren S. A prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite and autogenous bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60:297-284
14 임지순, 채경준, 김종관 등. 상악 전치부 단일 임플란트의 생존율에 대한 후향적 연구. 대한치주과학회지 2006;36(3):639-651   과학기술학회마을
15 Tatum H Jr. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am 1986; 30:207-229   PUBMED
16 박지은, 윤정호, 최성호 등. 임플란트 환자의 분포 및 식립부 유형. 대한치주과학회지 2004;34(4): 819-836
17 Schwartz Z, Martin JY, Dean DD et al. Effect of titanium surface roughness on chondrocyte proliferation, matrix production and differentiation depends upon the state of cell maturation. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;30:145-155   DOI
18 Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery : the osteotome technique. Compendium 1994;15:152, 154-156
19 Jemt T. Modified single and short-span restorations supported by osseointegrated fixtures in the partially edentulous jaw. J Proshtet Dent 1995;73:274-279   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Eckert SE, Parein A, Myshin HL, Padilla JL. Validation of dental implant systems through a review of the literature supplied by system manufacturers. J of Prosthet Dent 1997;77:271-279   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Maiorana C, Sigurta D, Mirandola A, Garlin G, Santoro F. Sinus evaluation with alloplasts or xenogenic materials and implants An up-to-4 year clinical and radiographic follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:426-432
22 Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990 Dec;1(1):33-40   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Misch CE. Maxillary sinus augmentation for endosseous implants organized alternative treatment plans. Int J Oral Implantol 1987;4:49-58   PUBMED
24 Ivanoff CJ, Widmark G, Hallgren C, Sennerby L, Wennerberg A. Histologic evaluation of the bone integration of $TiO_2$ blasted and turned titanium microimplants in humans. Clin Oral Imp Res 2001;12:128-134   DOI   ScienceOn
25 서현기, 채경준, 김종관 등. ITI $TE^\circledR$ 임플란트의 생존율에 관한 후향적 연구. 대한치주과학회지 2006;36(3):673-682   과학기술학회마을
26 홍성재, 백정원, 조규성 등. 임플란트 환자의 유형 및 분포에 대한 연구. 대한치주과학회지 2002;32(3) :539-554
27 Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxland T et al. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acidetched surface : a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;45:75-83   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Cochran DL. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces. J Periodontol 1999;70:1523-1539   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Lekholm U, Zarb G, Branemark PI. Tissue integrated prostheses osseointegration in clinical dentistry, Chicago, Quintessence, 1985:199-209
30 이승문, 채경준, 채중규 등. 하악 구치부에서 ITI SLA (Sand-blasted, Large-grit, Aid-etched) 임플란트를 이용한 단일 치아 수복의 후형적 임상 연구. 대한치주과학회지 2006;36(3):661-671   과학기술학회마을
31 Park JE, Kim TG, Chai JK et al. Long-term evaluation of IMZ implants ; success and survival rates. The Journal of Korean Academy of Periodontology 2005;35(4):1039-1052
32 Watzek G, Zechner W, Ulm C, Tangl S, Tepper G. Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of three types of dental implants following 18 months of occlusal loading : a preliminary study in baboons. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16(4):408-416   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980;38(8):613-6   PUBMED
34 김지선, 이서경, 방은경 등. 상악동 골이식술을 동반한 임플란트 식립 시 골이식재의 높이 변화에 대한 방사선학적 평가. 대한치주과학회지 2007;37(2):277-286   과학기술학회마을
35 채경준, 정의원, 최성호 등. 상악에 식립된 Frialit-2 임플란트의 성공률에 대한 후향적 연구. 대한치주과학회지 2005;35(2):449-460
36 김영택, 채경준, 최성호 등. 임플란트 환자의 유형 및 분포에 대한 연구. 대한구강악안면 임플란트학회지 2006;10(2):4-20
37 Haas R, Mensdorff-Pouilly N, Mailath G, Watzek G. Survival of 1,920 IMZ implants followed for up to 100 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11(5):581-588
38 Fugazzotto PA, Vlassis J. Long-term success of sinus augmentation using various surgical approaches and grafting materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13(1):52-58
39 Atwood DA. Postextraction changes in the adult mandible as illustrated by microradiographs of midsagital sections and serial cephalometric roentgenograms. J Prosthet Dent 1963;13:810-824   DOI
40 Carlsson L, Rostlund T, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson. T. Removal torques for polished and rough titanium implants. Int J of Oral and Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:21-24
41 Hatano N, Shimizu Y, Ooya K. A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 2:1 autogenous bone/ xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:339-345   DOI   ScienceOn
42 장인권, 정의원, 최성호 등. 하악에 식립된 Xive implant 환자의 분포 및 식립부 유형과 생존율. 대한치주과학회지 2005;35(2) :437-448
43 채경준, 정성민, 김창성 등. $Implantium^\circledR$ implant 의 단기 생존율 및 치유 양상에 대한 연구. 대한치주과학회지 2006;36(3):68:3-691   과학기술학회마을
44 Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, Weinstein R. Systemic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24(6):565-577   PUBMED
45 Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants : a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1(1):11-25   PUBMED
46 Martinez H, Davarpanah M, Missika P, Celletti R, Lazzara R. Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:423-432   DOI   ScienceOn