Micromorphometric change of implant surface conditioned with tetracycline-HCI;Hydroxyapatite surface

염산 테트라싸이클린이 HA 임플란트 표면구조에 미치는 영향

  • Yang, Dong-Il (Department of Periodontology and Institute of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kwon, Young-Hyuk (Department of Periodontology and Institute of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Park, Joon-Bong (Department of Periodontology and Institute of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Herr, Yeek (Department of Periodontology and Institute of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Chung, Jong-Hyuk (Department of Periodontology and Institute of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
  • 양동일 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실, 구강생물학연구소) ;
  • 권영혁 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실, 구강생물학연구소) ;
  • 박준봉 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실, 구강생물학연구소) ;
  • 허익 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실, 구강생물학연구소) ;
  • 정종혁 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실, 구강생물학연구소)
  • Published : 2007.12.31

Abstract

The present study was performed to evaluate the effect of Tetracycline-HCI on the change of implant surface microstructure according to application time. Implant with hydroxyapatite surface was were utilized. Implant surface was rubbed with 50mg/ml Tetracycline-HCI solution and sterilized saline for ${\frac{1}{2}}min.$, 1min., $1{\frac{1}{2}}min.$, 2min., $2{\frac{1}{2}}min.$, and 3min. respectively in the test group. Then, specimens were processed for scanning electron microscopic observation and measured surface roughness by optical interferometer. The results of this study were as follows. 1. Hydroxyapatite surface showed that round particles were deposited irregularly. 2. The roughness of surfaces conditioned with Tetracycline-HCI and saline was lessened and the cracks were increased relative to the application time. In conclusion, the detoxification with 50mg/ml Tetracycline-HCI must be applied respectively with appropriate time according to hydroxyapatite implant surfaces.

Keywords

References

  1. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  2. Lekholm U. Survival of the Branemark implant in partically edentulous jaws: A 10 year prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral maxillofac Implants 1999;14:639-645
  3. Lindh T, Gunne J, Tillberg A, Molin M. A metanalysis of implants in partial edentulism. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:80-90 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090203.x
  4. Quirynen M, Naert I, Van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Branemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:104-111 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030302.x
  5. Isidor F. Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:143-152 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070208.x
  6. Mombelli A, Van Oosten MAC, Schurch EJ, Lang NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1987;2:145-151 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302X.1987.tb00298.x
  7. Hickey JS, O'Neal RB, Scheidt MJ et al. Microbiologic characterization of ligature induced peri-implantitis in the microswine model. J Periodontol 1991;62:548-553 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.9.548
  8. Meffert RM. How to treat ailing and failing implants. Implant Dent 1992;1:25-33 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199200110-00003
  9. Parham PL, Cobb CM, French AA et al Effects of an air-powder abrasive system on plasma-sprayed titanium implant surfaces : an in vitro evaluation. J Oral Implantol 1989;15:78-86
  10. Mombelli A, Lang NP. The diagnosis and treatment of peri-implantitis. Periodontol 2000 1998;17:63-76 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1998.tb00124.x
  11. Esposito M, Hirsch J, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Differential diagnosis and treatment strategies for biologic complications and failing oral implants: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;4:473-490
  12. Baron M, Baas R, Dortbudak, O, Watzek G. Experimentally induced peri-implantitis: A review of different treatment methods described in the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;4:533-544
  13. Bowers KT, Keller JC. Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:302-310
  14. Muller E, Gonzaliz YM, Andreana S. Treatment of peri-implantitis: longitudinal clinical and microbiological findings. A case report. Implant Dent 1999;8:247-254 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199903000-00006
  15. Chairay JP, Boulekbache H, Jean A, Soyer A, Bouchard P. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the effects of an air-abrasive system on dental implants: A comparative in vitro study between machined and plasma-sprayed titanium surfaces. J Periodontol 1997;68:1215-1222 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1997.68.12.1215
  16. Hurzeler ME, Quinones CR, Schupbach P, Morrison EC, Caffesse RG. Treatment of peri-implantitis using guided bone regeneration and bone grafts, alone or in combination, in beagle dogs. Part II: Histologic finding. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:168-175
  17. Wielder R, Newman H, Strahan J. Stannous fluoride and subgingival chlorhexidine irrigation in the control of plaque and chronic periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 1983;10:172-181 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1983.tb02205.x
  18. Dennison DK, Huerzeler ME, Quinones C, Caffesse RG. Contaminated Implant Surfaces: an In vitro comparison of implant surface coating and treatment modalities for decontamination. J Periodontol 1994;65:942-948 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1994.65.10.942
  19. Meffert RM, Langer B, Fritz ME. Dental implants: A review. J Periodontol 1992;63:859-870 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1992.63.11.859
  20. Ericsson I, Persson LG, Berglundh T, Edlund T, Lindhe J. The effect of antimicrobial therapy on peri-implantitis lesions. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:320-328 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070404.x
  21. Persson LG, Ericsson I, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Guided bone generation in the treatment of peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:366-372 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070410.x
  22. Muller E, Gonzaliz YM, Andreana S. Treatment of peri-implantitis: Longitudinal clinical and microbiological findings. A case report. Implant Dent 1999;8:247-254 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199903000-00006
  23. Mellonig JT, Griffiths G, Mathys E, Spitznagel J. Treatment of the failing implant : A case reports. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1995;15:385-395
  24. Krozer A, Hall J, Ericsson I. Chemical treatment of machined titanium surfaces. An in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:204-211 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100303.x
  25. Somerman MJ, Foster RA, Vorsteg GM, Progebin K, Wynn RL. Effects of minocycline on fibroblast attachment and spreading. J Periodontal Res 1988;2:154-159
  26. Meffert RM. How to treat ailing and failing implants. Implant Dent 1992;1:25-33 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199200110-00003
  27. Artzi Z, Tal H, Chweidan H. Bone regeneration for reintegration in peri-implant destruction. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998;1:17-28
  28. Ivanoff CJ, Hallgren C, Widmark G, Sennerby L, Wennerberg A. Histological evaluation of the bone intergration of Ti02 blasted and turned titanium microimplants in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:128-134 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002128.x
  29. Ong JL, Carnes DL, Bessho K. Evaluation of titanium plasma-sprayed and plasma- sprayed hydroxyapatite implants in vivo. Biomaterials 2004;19:4601-4606
  30. Jovanovic SA, Kenney EB, Carranza EA, Donath K. The regenerative potential of plaque induced peri-implant bone defects treated by a submerged membrane technique: an experimental study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:13-18
  31. Johnson BW. HA-coated dental implants: Long-term consequences. J Calif Dent Assoc 1992;6:33-41
  32. Buser D, Warrer K, Karring T. Formation of a periodontal ligament around titanium implants. J Periodontol 1990;61:597-601 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1990.61.9.597
  33. Lindhe J, Berglundh T, Ericsson I, Liljenberg B, Marinello C. Experimental breakdown of peri-implant and periodontal tissues. A study in the beagle dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:9-16 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030102.x
  34. Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Jonsson K, Ericsson I. The topography of the vascular systems in the periodontal and peri-implant tissues in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 1994;21:189-193 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1994.tb00302.x
  35. Quirynen M, Listgarten MA. Distribution of bacterial morphotypes around natural teeth and titanium implants ad modum Branemark. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990;1:8-12 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010102.x
  36. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-years period. Scand J Plast Recontr Surg 1977;11:1-132 https://doi.org/10.3109/02844317709025488
  37. Thomson-Neal D, Evans GH, Meffert RM. Effects of various prophylactic treatments on titanium, sapphire, and hydroxyapatite -coated implants: An SEM study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1989;4:300-311
  38. Dennison DK, Huerzeler ME, Quinones C, Caffesse RG. Contaminated implant surfaces: An in vitro comparison of implant surface coating and treatment modalities for decontamination. J Periodontol 1994;10:942-948
  39. Chairay JP, Boulekbache H, Jean A, Soyer A, Bouchard P. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the effects of an air-abrasive system on dental implants: A comparative in vitro study between machined and plasma-sprayed titanium surfaces. J Periodontol 1997;68:1215-1222 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1997.68.12.1215
  40. Augthun M, Tinschert J, Huber A. In vitro studies on the effect of cleaning methods on different implant surfaces. J Periodontol 1998;69:857-64 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.8.857