Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지

Rethinking K-6 Scientific literacy: A Case Study of Using Science Books as Tool to Cultivate a Fundamental Sense of Scientific Literacy

  • Published : 2007.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As the discourse of scientific literacy has broadly summed up the goals of science education in the current decade, this study attempts to question how we contextualize appropriate interpretations and feasible approaches to scientific literacy in K-6 science education. With respect to the complex praxis of scientific knowledge and practice, this study emphasizes the participatory framework of scientific literacy which interweaves children's everyday experiences and science learning. This study also concerns children's abilities to understand and enact scientific enterprises (i.e., children's fundamental sense of scientific literacy). As a way of developing K-6 scientific literacy, this study investigates how using science books can broaden the scope of children's understandings of science in life connections and promote a fundamental sense of scientific literacy through talking, reading, and writing skills in Grade two science classrooms in Canada. Second graders were engaged in learning "sound" for five weeks. During science lessons, children's talks were recorded and their writings were collected for data interpretation. This research finds that using science books can encourage children to become engaged in communicative activities such as talking, reading, and writing in science; furthermore, using science books develops children's inquiry skills. These findings open a further discussion on scientific literacy at the K-6 levels.

Keywords

References

  1. Aikenhead, G. (1994): What is STS Science Teaching? In J. Solomon & G. Aikenhead (Eds.), STS education: International perspectives on reform, (pp. 47-59). New York & London: Teachers College Columbia University
  2. Aikenhead, G. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York: Teachers College Press
  3. Blades, D. (1995). Procedures of power in a curriculum-discourse: Conversations from home. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 11(4), 125-155
  4. Blades, D. (1997). Procedures of power and curriculum change: Foucault and the quest for possibilities in science education. New York: Peter Lang
  5. DeBoer, G. (2000). Scientific literacy: another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601 https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L
  6. Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
  7. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R. & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Buckingham & Philadelphia: Open University Press
  8. Falk, J. (2001). Free-choice science learning: Framing the discussion. In J. Falk (Ed.), Free-choice science education (pp. 3-20), New York: Teachers College Press
  9. Fleming, R. (1989). Literacy for a technological age. Science Education, 73(4), 391-404 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730730402
  10. Galbraith, P., Carss, M., Grice, R., Endean, L., & Warry, M. (1997). Toward scientific literacy for the third millennium: a view from Australia. International journal of science education, 19(4), 447-467 https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190407
  11. Gallas, K. (1995). Talking their way into science: hearing children's questions and theories, responding with curricula. New York: Teachers College Press
  12. Hand, B., Prain, V., Lawrence, C., & Yore, L. (1999). A writing in science framework designed to enhance science literacy. International journal of science education, 21(10), 1021-1035 https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290165
  13. Hand, B., Alvermann, D., Gee, J., Guzzetti, B., Norris, S., Philips, L., Prain, V., & Yore, L. (2003). Message from the 'Island Group': what is literacy in science literacy? Journal of research in science teaching, 40(7), 607-615 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10101
  14. Hand, B. & Prain, V. (2003). Teachers implementing writing to learn strategies in junior secondary science: a case study. Science education, 86(6), 737-755 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10016
  15. Hand, B. & Keys, C. (1999). Inquiry investigation: a new approach to laboratory reports. The science teacher, 66, 27-29
  16. Hodson, D. (2003), Time for action: science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645-670 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305021
  17. Hurd, P. (1998). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science education, 82(3), 407 -416 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199806)82:3<407::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-G
  18. Hurd, P. (2002). Modernizing science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 39(1), 3-9 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10002
  19. Rennie, L. & Jarvis, T. (1995). Children's choice of drawings to communicate their ideas about technology. Research in science education, 25(3), 239-252 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357399
  20. Jenkins, E. (2000). 'Science for all': times for a paradigm shift? In R. Miller (Ed.), Improving science education: the contribution of research (pp. 207-226). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press
  21. Keys, C. (1999). Revitalizing instruction on scientific genres: connecting knowledge production in the writing to learn in science. Science education 83(1), 115-130 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199903)83:2<115::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-Q
  22. Kolsto, S (2000). Consensus projects: teaching science for citizenship. International journal of science education, 22(6), 654-664
  23. Kolsto, S. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science education, 85(3), 291-310 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1011
  24. Norris, S. & Phillips, L. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224-240 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10066
  25. National Resource Center (1997). Science for All Children: A Guide to Improving Elementary Science Education in Your School District. Washington DC: National Academy Press
  26. Pedretti, E. (2003). Teaching science, technology, society and environment (STSE) education. In D. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 219-240). Dordrecht, Boston, & London: Kluwer Academic Publishers
  27. Roberts, D. (1983). Scientific literacy: Towards balance in setting goals for school science programs. Toronto: Guidance Centre, University of Toronto
  28. Roberts, D. (1995). Building companion meanings into school science programs. Nordisk Pedagogik, 15(2), 108-124
  29. Roth, W-M. & Desautels, J. (2004). Educating for citizenship: Reappraising the role of science education. Canadian Journal of science, mathematics and technology education, 4(2), 149-168 https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150409556603
  30. Shamos, M. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick & New Jersey: Rutgers University Press
  31. Solomon, J. (1993). Teaching science, technology and society. Buckingham & Philadelphia: Open University Press
  32. Song, J. (2006). Humanistic science education thorough context-rich approaches. Journal of Korean elementary science education, 25(4), 383-395
  33. Wheatly, G. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning. Science education, 75(1), 9-21 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730750103
  34. Yager, R. (2000). A vision for what science education should be like for the first 25 years of a new millennium. School Science & Mathematics, 100(6), 327-342 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17327.x
  35. Yore, L., Bisanz, G., & Hand, B. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International journal of science education, 25(6), 689-725 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305018
  36. Zeidler, D., Walker, K., Ackett, W., & Simmons, M. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socicoscientific dilemmas. Science education, 86(3), 343-367 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10025
  37. Zeidler, D., Sadler, T., Simmons, M., & Howes E. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
  38. Zimmermam, C., Bisanz, G., & Bisanz, J. (1998). Everyday scientific literacy: Do students use information about the social context and methods of research to evaluate news briefs about science? The Alberta journal of educational research, XLIV(2), 188-207
  39. Zimmermam, C., Bisanz, G., Bisanz, J., Klein, J., & Klein, P. (2001). Science at the supermarket: a comparison of what appears in the popular press, experts' advice to readers, and what students what to know. Public understanding of science, 10, 37-58 https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/10/1/303