비정복성 관절원판변위와 전치부 개교합 발생간의 관계

The Relationship between Anterior Disc Displacement without Reduction and Development of Anterior Open Bite

  • 허윤경 (부산대학교 치과대학 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 고명연 (부산대학교 치과대학 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 안용우 (부산대학교 치과대학 구강내과학교실)
  • Hur, Yun-Kyung (Department of Oral Medicine, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Ko, Myung-Yun (Department of Oral Medicine, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Ahn, Yong-Woo (Department of Oral Medicine, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 발행 : 2007.09.30

초록

목적 : 비정복성 관절원판변위와 연관되어 전치부 개교합이 발생하는 원인과 교합장치 치료가 개교합 발생과 연관이 있는 지를 살펴보고자 한다. 재료 및 방법 : 2년간 경북대학병원 구강내과에 턱관절 질환으로 내원한 환자 중에 임상적으로 비정복성 관절원판변위로 진단된 환자를 대상으로 파노라마, 측방 횡두개상 그리고 측방 두부방사선 사진을 촬영하였다. 환자는 3군으로 나누었으며 1군은 처음 병원에 내원할 때 개교합이 있거나 교합장치 치료를 제외한 치료도중에 갑자기 개교합이 유발된 군(22명), 2군은 교합장치 치료 도중에 개교합이 발생한 군과 이 기간동안 예전에 이미 교합장치 치료도중 개교합이 발생한 후 정기적 관찰 환자를 포함한 군(16명). 그리고 3군은 교합장치 치료 후에도 개교합이 발생하지 않은 군(20명)으로 구성되었다. 측방 두부방사선 계측으로 개교합 발생과 안면부 골격 형태의 연관성을 한국인 정상 교합자들의 평균치와 각 3군 간의 t-test 비교와 ANOVA를 이용해 3군 간의 골격 형태를 비교 조사하였다. 결과 : 1. 1군과 2군은 정상 교합자들의 평균치와 비교했을 때 대부분의 경우에서 유의한 차이가 있었으며, 1, 2, 3군 모두에서 하악의 크기와 형태를 나타내는 변수들과 더 작은 ANB, 더 큰 FMA 값을 보였다. 2. 세군 간의 비교에서 1군과 2군은 3군에 비해 더 큰 하악하연각 (a larger FMA, a larger SN to mandibular plane angle), 짧은 하악지, 더 큰 하악각을 가졌으며, 1군과 2군 간은 통계학적 유의한 차이가 없어 비슷한 수직적 부조화가 큰 골격형태를 가졌으며, 3군은 1, 2군과는 달랐다. 결론 : 이상의 결과로 미루어 1군과 2군은 수직적 부조화가 큰 안모 형태를 보여 저작근의 작용 방향과 저작근 부착 위치에 따른 하악의 후하방 회전의 결과로 전치부 개교합이 발생하는 것으로 생각된다. 그리고 수직적 부조화가 큰 경우일 때는 수직 고경의 변화를 일으키는 것은 좀 더 주의가 필요하리라 생각한다.

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate if there is a relationship between anterior disc displacement without reduction and development of anterior open bite, and a relation between occurrence of open bite and occlusal appliance therapy. In general, the statistically significant differences were found between the Group 1 and 2 and normal mean group. The variables that represent mandibular size and form, showed a statistical significance in all 3 groups. Also 3 groups patients had a smaller ANB, a larger FMA than normal mean group. When we compared the 3 groups with respect to all cephalometric measurements by One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), group 1 and 2 patients had a larger FMA, a larger SN to mandibular plane angle, a larger maxillomandibular plane angle, a larger occlusal plane to mandibular plane angle, a smaller total posterior facial height/total anterior facial height(%), and a larger gonial angle than group 3. The statistically significant differences were not found between the Group 1 and 2, and skeletal patterns were similar. Thus, morphologic features of patients with vertical discrepancies may represent a risk factor for the development of anterior open bite with or without occlusal appliance treatment. In case of patients with vertical discrepancy, we may have to be more careful when inducing a change of the vertical dimension.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Guyuron B. Facial deformity of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988;81:948-951 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198806000-00021
  2. Marini I, Vecchiet F, Spiazzi L, Capurso U. Stomatognathic function in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and in developmental open-bite subjects. ASDC J Dent Child 1999;66:30-35
  3. Harper RP, Brown CM, Triplett MM, Villasenor A, Gatchel RJ. Masticatory function in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Pediatr Dent 2000;22:200-206
  4. Lanigan DT, Myall RW, West RA, McNeill RW. Condylysis in a patient with a mixed collagen vascular disease. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1979;48:198-204 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(79)90002-1
  5. Haers PE, Sailer HF. Mandibular resorption due to systemic sclerosis: Case report of surgical correction of a secondary open bite deformity. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;24:261-267 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(95)80025-5
  6. Chen YJ, Shih TTF, Wang JS, Wang HY, Shiau YY. Magnetic resonance images of the temporomandibular joints of patients with acquired open bite. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99:734-42 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.10.020
  7. Hur YK, Choi JK. Cephalometric characteristics of the patients with developed anterior open bite following anterior disc dislocation without reduction. Korean J Oral Med 2006;31:255-263
  8. Baek HS, Park YC, Sohn BH, Yoo YK. Cephalometrics. Seoul, 1999, Jee Sung Publishing, pp193-210
  9. Sung JH, Kwon OW, Kyung HM, Park KD. Longitudinal data of craniofacial growth from lateral cephalometrics in Korean with normal occlusion. Seoul, 2001, Jung Won Publishing
  10. Sassouni V, Nanda S. Analysis of dentofacial vertical proportions. Am J Orthodont 1964;50:801-822 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(64)90039-9
  11. Takada K, Lowe AA, Freund VK. Canonical correlations between masticatory muscle orientation and dentoskeletal morphology in children. Am J Orthod 1984;86:331-341 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90144-1
  12. Haas AJ. A biological approach to diagnosis, mechanics, and treatment of vertical dysplasias. Angle Orthod 1980;50:279-300
  13. Throckmorton G, Finn RA, Bell WH. Biomechanics of differences in lower facial height. Am J Orthod 1980;77:410-420 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(80)90106-2
  14. Proffit WR, Fields HW. Occlusal forces in normal and long-face children. J Dent Res 1983;62(5):571-574 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345830620051301
  15. Bakke M, Michler L. Temporalis and masseter muscle activity in patients with anterior open bite and craniomandibular disorders. Scand J Dent Res 1991;99:219-228
  16. Kayukawa H. Malocclusion and masticatory muscle activity: A comparison of four types of malocclusion. J Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 1992;16(3):162-177
  17. Udea HM, Miyamoto K, Tanne K. Relationship between masticatory muscle activity and vertical craniofacial morphology. The Angle Orthodontist 1998;68(3):233-238
  18. Raadsheer MC, van Eijden TMGJ, van Ginkel FC, Prahl-Andersen B. Contribution of jaw muscle size and craniofacial morphology to human bite force magnitude. J Dent Res 1999;78(1):31-42 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345990780010301
  19. Tuxen A, Bakke M, Pinholt EM. Comparative data from young men and women on masseter muscle fibers, function and facial morphology. Archives of Oral Biology 1999;44:509-518 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9969(99)00008-4
  20. Kitai N, Fujii Y, Murakami S, Furukawa S, Kreiborg S, Takada K. Human masticatory muscle volume and zygomatico-mandibular prognathism. J Dental Res 2002;81(11):752-756 https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910208101106
  21. Kim JW, Yoe WH. Diagnosis and treatment of Temporomandibular joint trauma. Seoul, 1996, Narae Publishing, pp21-22
  22. Stringert HG, Worms FW. Variations in skeletal and dental patterns with structural and functional alterations of the temporomandibular joint: A preliminary report. Am J Orthod 1986;89:285-297 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(86)90050-3
  23. Muto T, Kawakami J, Kanazawa M et al. Relationship between disc displacement and morphologic features of skeletal Class III malocclusion. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1998;13(2):145-151
  24. Nebbe B, Major PW, Prasad NG. Adolescent female craniofacial morphology associated with advanced bilateral TMJ disc displacement. Eur J Orthod Dec 1998;20(6):701-712 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/20.6.701
  25. Tanne K, Tanaka E, Sakuda M. Stress distributions in the TMJ during clenching in patients with vertical discrepancies of the craniofacial complex. J Orofac Pain 1995;9:153-160
  26. Miyajima K, McNamara Jr, Kimura T, Murata S, Lizuka T. Craniofacial structure of Japanese and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996;110:431-438 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70047-1
  27. Sakamoto T. A study on the development changes of dentofacial complex of Japanese with special reference to Sella Turcica. J Jpn Orthod 1959;18:1-17
  28. Engle G, Spolter BM. Cephalometric and visual norms for a Japanese population. Am J Orthod 1981;80: 48-60 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(81)90195-0
  29. Pullinger AG, Seligman DA, Gornbein JA. A multiple logistic regression analysis of the risk and relative odds of temporomandibular disorders as a function of common occlusal features. J Dent Res 1993;72:968-979 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345930720061301