Application of Digital Signal Analysis Technique to Enhance the Quality of Tracer Gas Measurements in IAQ Model Tests

  • Lee, Hee-Kwan (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Incheon) ;
  • Awbi, Hazim B. (School of Construction Management and Engineering, University of Reading)
  • Published : 2007.12.31

Abstract

The introduction of tracer gas techniques to ventilation studies in indoor environments provides valuable information that used to be unattainable from conventional testing environments. Data acquisition systems (DASs) containing analogue-to-digital (A/D) converters are usually used to function the key role that records signals to storage in digital format. In the testing process, there exist a number of components in the measuring equipment which may produce system-based inference to the monitored results. These unwanted fluctuations may cause significant error in data analysis, especially when non-linear algorithms are involved. In this study, a pre-processor is developed and applied to separate the unwanted fluctuations (noise or interference) in raw measurements and to reduce the uncertainty in the measurement. Moving average, notch filter, FIR (Finite Impulse Response) filters, and IIR (Infinite Impulse Response) filters are designed and applied to collect the desired information from the raw measurements. Tracer gas concentrations are monitored during leakage and ventilation tests in the model test room. The signal analysis functions are introduced to carry out the digital signal processing (DSP) work. Overall the FIR filters process the $CO_2$ measurement properly for ventilation rate and mean age of air calculations. It is found that, the Kaiser filter was the most applicable digital filter for pre-processing the tracer gas measurements. Although the IIR filters help to reduce the random noise in the data, they cause considerable changes to the filtered data, which is not desirable.

Keywords

References

  1. Castleman, K.R. (1996) Digital Image Analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
  2. Chatfield, C. (1996) The Analysis of Time Series-an introduction, Chapman & Hall, London
  3. Chow, W.K., W.Y. Fung, and L.T. Wong (2002) Preliminary studies on a new method for assessing ventilation in large spaces, Building and Environment, 37, 145-152 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(01)00020-8
  4. Drescher, A.C., D.Y. Park, M.G. Yost, A.J. Gadgil, S.P. Levine, and W.W. Nazaroff (1997) Stationary and time-dependent indoor tracer-gas concentration profiles measured by OP-FTIR remote sensing and SBFM-computed tomography, Atmospheric Environment, 31(5), 727-740 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00221-X
  5. Etheridge, D. and M. Sandberg (1996) Building Ventilation: theory and measurement, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, U.K
  6. Fischer, M.L., P.N. Price, T.L. Thatcher, C.A. Schwalbe, M.J. Craig. E.E. Wood, R.G. Sextro, and A.J. Gadgil (2001) Rapid measurements and mapping of tracer gas concentrations in a large indoor space, Atmospheric Environment, 35, 2837-2844 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00081-4
  7. Hong, J.H., J.H. Lee, and S.S. Park (2007) Application of an in-situ measurement system to determine HONO levels in an indoor environment, Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 23(2), 191-202 https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2007.23.2.191
  8. Jayaraman, B., E.U. Finlayson, M.D. Sohn, T.L. Thatcher, P.N. Price, E.E. Wood, R.G. Sextro, and A.J. Gadgil (2006) Tracer gas transport under mixed convection conditions in an experimental atrium: Comparison between experiments and CFD predictions, Atmospheric Environment, 40, 5236-5250 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.04.021
  9. Kamen, E.W. and B.S. Heck (1997) Fundamentals of Signals and Systems-using MATLAB, Prentice Hall, New Jersey
  10. Karlsson, J.F. and B. Moshfegh (2007) A comprehensive investigation of a low-energy building in Sweden, Renewable Energy, 32, 1830-1841 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2006.10.009
  11. Kim, S.D., T.S. Kim, H. Lee, and J.J. Lee (1993) The spatial characteristics of ventilation efficiency, Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 9(3), 236-241
  12. Lagus, P.L. (1977) Characterization of building infiltration by the tracer-dilution method, Energy 2(4), 461-464 https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(77)90009-3
  13. Lee, H. (1993) Study on the Influence of Ventilation on Indoor Air Pollutant Removal, Master Thesis, the University of Seoul, Seoul
  14. Lee, H. and H.B. Awbi (1998) Effect of data logging frequency on tracer gas measurement. In Proceedings of the Roomvent '98, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, June 14-17, Vol. 2, 477-482
  15. O'Neill, P.J. and R.R. Crawford (1991) Identification of flow and volume parameters in multizone systems using a single-gas tracer technique, ASHRAE Transactions, Vol. 97, 49-54
  16. Phillips, D. and G. Bragg (1994) The measurement of high frequency variations in concentrations of indoor air constituents. ASHRAE Transactions, Vol. 100, 1225-1229
  17. Ramirez, R.W. (1985) The FFT-fundamentals and concepts, Prentice Hall, New Jersey
  18. Said, M.N.A. (1997) Measurement of air change rates and air flow patterns in large single-cell buildings, Energy and buildings, 26, 175-182 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(96)01032-8
  19. Sandberg, M. and H. Stymne (1989) The constant tracer flow technique, Building and Environment, 24(3), 209-219 https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1323(89)90034-6
  20. Sherman, M.H. (1989a) Analysis of errors associated with passive ventilation measurement techniques. Building and Environment 24(2), 131-139 https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1323(89)90002-4
  21. Sherman, M.H. (1989b) Uncertainty in air flow calculations using tracer gas measurements, Building and Environment, 24(4), 347-354 https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1323(89)90029-2
  22. Signal Processing Toolbox User's Guide (v4.2) (1998) Mathworks Inc., Massachusetts
  23. Sohn, M.D. and M.J. Small (1999) Parameter estimation of unknown air exchange rates and effective mixing volumes from tracer gas measurements for complex multi-zone indoor air models, Building and Environment, 34, 293-303 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(98)00022-5