RFID 프로토콜의 충돌방지 알고리즘의 성능 개선과 알고리즘 비교

Performance Improvement of Anti-collision Algorithm for RFID Protocol and Algorithm Comparison

  • Lim, Jung-Hyun (Cheju University, Dept. of Telecommunication Engineering) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Yoon (Cheju University, Dept. of Telecommunication Engineering) ;
  • Jwa, Jeong-Woo (Cheju University, Dept. of Telecommunication Engineering) ;
  • Yang, Doo-Yeong (Cheju University, Dept. of Telecommunication Engineering)
  • 발행 : 2007.11.25

초록

본 논문에서는 RFID 시스템에 사용되는 무선 환경 표준 프로토콜 중 UHF 대역 프로토콜인 ISO 18000-6군의 타입들과 EPCglobal의 클래스들에 대한 충돌방지 알고리즘을 구현하였다. 또한 표준 프로토콜의 성능을 개선한 충돌방지 알고리즘을 제안하고, 링크타이밍의 클록 주기를 2세대 클래스-1 주기인 $12.5{\mu}s$로 동일하게 한 상태에서 그 성능을 비교하였다. 그 결과, 500개의 태그가 리더인식영역 내에 동시에 존재할 때 표준 프로토콜에 대한 태그인식 성능은 1세대 클래스-1, Type B, Type A, 클래스-0, 2세대 클래스-1의 차례로 좋아지고, 개선된 프로토콜에 대한 태그인식 성능은 Type B, Type A, 1세대 클래스-1, 클래스-0, 2세대 클래스-1의 순서로 좋아진다. 그러므로 프로토콜로 규정된 클록 주기와 리더와 태그 간의 링크타이밍에 따라 태그 인식성능이 현저히 달라짐을 알 수 있다.

In this paper, Air-interface protocols of ISO 18000-6 Types and EPCglobal Classes applied to RFID system in UHF band are analyzed, and those anticollision algorithms are realized. Also, the each algorithm which improves the performance of standard protocol is proposed, and the performance is compared when clock period of link timing is a identical condition on $12.5{\mu}s$. As the result, when 500 tags exist simultaneously inside reader interrogation zone, the tag recognition performance of a standard protocol is better in preceding order of Class-1 Generation-1, Type B, Type A, Class-0 and Class-1 Generation-2. And also the performance of improved protocol is better in ascending order of Type B, Type A, Class-1 Generation-1, Class-0 and Class-1 Generation-2. Therefore, performance of tag recognition remarkably depends on the regulated clock period in the protocol and link timing between a reader and a tag.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. D. W. Engels and S. E. Sarma, 'The reader collision problem,' IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 3, pp. 6, October 2002
  2. K. Finkenzeller, 'RFID Handbook.' Wiley & Sons, 2003
  3. ISO/IEC 'Information technology - radio frequency identification for item management part7: parameters for active air interface communications at 860 MHz to 960 MHz,' May 2004
  4. B. Zhen and M. Kobayashi, 'Framed ALOHA for multiple RFID objects identification,' IEICE Trans. Communication, Vol. E88-B, pp. 991-999, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1093/ietcom/e88-b.3.991
  5. E. Zurich, 'RFID multiple access methods,' Summer semester 2004, Luc Andre Burdet, 2004
  6. H. S. Choi, J. R. Cha and J. H. Kim, 'Fast wireless anti-collision algorithm in ubiquitous ID system,' Vehicular Technology Conference 2004, Vol. 6, pp. 4589-4592, September 2004
  7. Auto-ID Center Massachusetts of Technology, Technical Report, 'Draft protocol specification for a 900 MHz Class 0 radio frequency identification tag,' 2003
  8. Auto-ID Center Massachusetts of Technology, Technical Report, '860-930 MHz Class-1 radio frequency identification tag radio frequency & logical communication interface specification candidate recommendation version 1.0.1,' 2002
  9. EPCglobal, 'EPCTM radio-frequency identity protocol Class-1 Generation-2 UHF RFID protocol for communication at 860-960 MHz version 1.0.9,' 2004