DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study on the Characteristics of Scholarly Communication in Subject Fields through the Web and Scientific Journals

웹과 학술지를 통한 학술커뮤니케이션의 특성연구

  • Published : 2007.12.31

Abstract

In this study, the characteristics of scholarly communication through the Web and scientific journals are explored, and scholarly communication patterns in two scientific disciplines are compared to reveal the difference. Economics and Computer Science-Information Systems are selected as two disciplines to be analyzed. In the data collection process, 10 keywords are extracted from a database for each subject field, and scholarly Web pages and journal articles related to these keywords are collected and analyzed. Our investigation includes the characteristics of scholarly Web pages, Multi-Dimensional Scaling (MDS) analysis of co-linked Web pages as well as co-cited journal articles, and changes in the scholarly communication activities occurring on the Web and in scientific journals respectively over time. We found certain differences as well as common features in scholarly communication patterns between the Web and scientific journals for both fields of Economics and Computer Science. We also found that scholarly communication occurring on the Web displays unique features for each subtopic within the same field of study.

이 연구에서는 웹과 학술지를 통한 학술 커뮤니케이션의 특성을 각각 분석하고, 웹상에서의 학술 커뮤니케이션 패턴이 학문 분야에 따라 어떤 차이를 보이는지 비교하였다. 경제학과 컴퓨터공학-정보시스템분야에서 키워드를 추출하여 이와 관련된 학술적 웹페이지와 학술지 논문을 수집하였고, 이를 학술적 웹페이지의 특성, 웹페이지 동시링크와 학술지 논문 동시인용 데이터의 다차원척도(MDS) 분석, 시간의 흐름에 따른 학술 활동의 변화 등 세 가지 측면에서 분석하였다. 분석결과, 웹과 학술지를 통한 학술 커뮤니케이션에는 공통점과 차이점이 나타났으며, 이런 현상은 두 학문 분야에서 모두 확인되었다. 그리고 웹을 통한 학술 커뮤니케이션의 경우 같은 학문 분야 내의 세부 주제에 따라서 고유한 특성이 나타나는 것을 볼 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bar-Ialn, J. 2004.' A microscopic link analysis of academic institutions within a country - the case of Israel .'Scientometics, 59(3): 391-403 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018540.33706.c1
  2. Bjorneborn, L. and Ingwersen, P. 2004. 'Towards a basic framework for webometrics.' Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14): 1216-1227 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077
  3. Kling, R. and Callahan, E. 2003. 'Electronic journals, the internet,and scholarly communication.' Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37:127-177 https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370105
  4. Kling, R. and McKim, G. 2000. 'Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(14):1306-1320 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1047>3.0.CO;2-T
  5. Palmer, C.L. 2005. 'Scholarly Work and the Shaping of Digital Access.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(11): 1140-1153 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20204
  6. Pritchard, A.1969.'Statistical Biblio graphy or Bibliometrics.' Journal of Documentation. 25(1): 348-49
  7. Small, H.G.1973. 'Cocitation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents.'Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24:265-269 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
  8. Thelwall, M., Vaughan, L., Cothey, V., Li, X., and Smith, A.G.2003. 'Which academic subjects have most online impact? A pilot study and a new classification process.' Online Information Review, 27(5): 333-343 https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520310502298
  9. Vaughan, L. 2006. 'Visualizing linguistic and cultural differences using web co-link data.'Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(9): 1178-1193 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20398
  10. Vaughan, L. and Shaw, D. 2003. 'Bibliographic and Web citation: what is the difference?' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(14): 1313-1322 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10338
  11. Vaughan, L. and Thelwall, M. 2003.'Scholarly use of the Web: what are the key inducers of links to journal web sites?' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(1): 29-38 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10184
  12. White, H.D. and Griffith, B.C. 1981. 'Author cocitation: Aliterature measure of intellectual structure.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 32(3): 163-171 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320302