한국가금학회지 (Korean Journal of Poultry Science)

  • 제33권2호
  • /
  • Pages.141-149
  • /
  • 2006
  • /
  • 1225-6625(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-5387(eISSN)
한국가금학회 (The Korean Society of Poultry Science)
권호 표지

유기산제제 ($Lactacid^(R)$)와 Essential Oil($Immunocin^(R)$)이 육계의 생산성과 영양소 이용율, 소장내 미생물 균총 및 면역 체계에 미치는 영향

Effects of Dietary Acidifier($Lactacid^(R)$) and Essential Oil($Immunocin^(R)$) on the Performance, Nutrient Metabolizability, Small Intestinal Microflora and Immune Response in Broiler Chicks

  • 우경천 (중앙대학교 산업과학대학 동물자원과학과) ;
  • 이문구 (중앙대학교 산업과학대학 동물자원과학과) ;
  • 정병윤 (중앙대학교 산업과학대학 동물자원과학과) ;
  • 백인기 (중앙대학교 산업과학대학 동물자원과학과)
  • Woo K.C. (Department of Animal Science and Technology, College of Industrial Science, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Lee M.K. (Department of Animal Science and Technology, College of Industrial Science, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Jung B.Y. (Department of Animal Science and Technology, College of Industrial Science, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Paik I.K. (Department of Animal Science and Technology, College of Industrial Science, Chung-Ang University)
  • 발행 : 2006.06.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 실험은 항생제 $BMD^(R)$ premix(Bacitracin methylene disalicylate), 유기산 복합제인 $Lactacid^(R)$((주) 은진인터내셔날) 그리고 essential oil 제품인 $Immunocin^(R)$((주) 은진인터내셔날) 이 육계에 미치는 영향을 비교 평가하기 위하여 생산성, 영양소 이용율, 혈액 성상, ND titer, IgG, 그리고 장내 미생물 균총 등을 조사하기 위해 실시하였다. 사양 시험은 육계 ($Ross^(R)$종) 1,000수 (암 수 각각 500수)를 공시하여 4처리 5반복, 반복당 암 수 동수로 50수씩을 floor pen(가로: 2.0m, 세로: 2.4m) 에 완전임의 배치하였다. 사양시험 기간은 35일, 시험 기간 동안 물과 사료를 자유 채식시켰고 24시간 점등하였다. 시험구는 대조구, $BMD^(R)$ premix(Bacitracin methylene disalicylate 2.5%) 0.1 % 첨가구, $Lactacid^(R)$ 0.5% 첨가구, 그리고 $Immunocin^(R)$ 0.1% 첨가구등 4첨가구를 두었다. 생산성에서 essential oil 복합제 $Immunocin^(R)$ 0.1% 첨가구가 $BMD^(R)$ 25ppm 첨가한 항생제구와 동일한 수준의 생산성 개선 효과를 보였는데 (P<0.05) 특히 사료 요구율이 유의하게 향상되었다(P<0.05). 그러나 유기산 복합제인 $Lactacid^(R)$ 0.5% 첨가구는 항생제구보다 생산성 개선 효과가 없었다. IgG 농도는 $Immunocin^(R)$구가 첨가구들 중에서 가장 높았으며(P<0.05) 혈액의 leukocytes 와 stress index는 $Immunocin^(R)$ 첨가구가 낮은 경향을 나타냈다. 장내 미생물의 Cl. perfringens 수는 첨가구간에는 유의차가 없었으며 E. coli 수는 항생제구와 $Immunocin^(R)$ 구가 가장 적었다(P<0.05). 영양소 이용 율에 있어서 조단백질은 $Lactacid^(R)$ 구와 $Immunocin^(R)$ 구 높았다(P< 0.05). NFE 이용율은 생산성 개선 효과는 없었으나 $Lactacid^(R)$ 구가 가장 높았다(P<0.05). 결론적으로 essential oil 제제인 $Immunocin^(R)$을 육계 사료의 첨가제로 사용시 항생제와 같은 수준의 생산성 개선 효과를 보였으나 유기산제제인 $Lactacid^(R)$는 대조구와 차이가 없었다.

An experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of dietary acidifier($Lactacid^(R)$) and essential oil($Immunocin^(R)$) on the performance, nutrient metabolizability, small intestinal microflora, IgG level and leukocytes and erythrocytes in broiler chickens. Five hundred males and 500 females broiler chickens($Ross^(R)$) were divided into 20 pens of 50 chickens(25 birds in each sex). Five pens were assigned to each of four dietary treatments: control, diets containing antibiotics(Bacitracin methylene disalicilate), acidifier($Lactacid^(R)$) and essential oil($Immunocin^(R)$) dietary treatments. Birds were fed experimental diets ad libitum 5 wks. Weight gain, feed intake, and feed conversion rate were significantly affected by dietary treatment(P<0.05). Overall weight gain($0{\sim}5$ wks) of $Lactacid^(R)$ treatment was significantly lower than the others. Feed intake was highest(P<0.05) in the control followed by antibiotics, $Lactacid^(R)\;and\;Immunocin^(R)$ treatment. Feed conversion rate of $Immunocin^(R)$ treatment was lowest(P<0.05) followed by antibiotics, $Lactacid^(R)$ treatment and the control. Production indices of $Immunocin^(R)$ and antibiotics treatments were significantly higher than those of the control and $Lactacid^(R)$ treatment(P<0.05). $Immunocin^(R)$ treatment was the highest and antibiotics was lowest in serum IgG level. The number of leukocytes and stress index(neutrophil/lymphocytes) tended to be lower in $Immunocin^(R)$ treatment than others. There were no significant differences in erythrocytes among the treatments. The cfu of E. coli was significantly lower in $Immunocin^(R)$ and antibiotics treatments than $Lactacid^(R)$ treatment and the control. Metabolizability of crude protein was significantly lower in the control than $Lactacid^(R)\;and\;Immunocin^(R)$ treatment while that of NFE was significantly lower in $Immunocin^(R)\;than\;Lactacid^(R)$ and antibiotics treatments. It was concluded that essential oil product $Immunocin^(R)$ is as effective as antibiotics in improving feed conversion efficiency and production index while $Lactacid^(R)$ is not.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adams CH 1999 Nutricines Food Components in Health and Nutrition. Nottingham Univ. Press
  2. Brown DR, Southern LL 1985 Effect of citric acid and ascorbic acid on performance and intestinal pH of chicks. Poultry Sci 64(7):1399-401 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0641399
  3. Cave NA 1984 Effect of dietary propionic and lactic acid on feed intake by chicks. Poultry Sci 63(1):131-134 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0630131
  4. Garrido MN, Skjervheim M, Oppegaard H, Sorum H 2004 acidified litter benefits the intestinal flora balance of broiler chickens. Appl Environ Microbial 70(9):5208-5213 https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.9.5208-5213.2004
  5. Giannenas IP, Florou-Paneri P, Papazahariadou M, Christaki E, Botsoglou NA, Spais AB 2003 Effect of dietary supplementation with oreano essential oil on performance of broiler after experimental infection with Eimeria tenella. Arch Tierernahr 57(2):99-106 https://doi.org/10.1080/0003942031000107299
  6. Glick DM, Valler MJ, Rowlands CC, Evans JC, Kay J 1982 Activation of spin labeled chicken pepsinogen. Biochemistry 3:21(16):3746-3750
  7. Hernandez F, Madrid J, Garcia V, Orengo J, Megias MD 2004 Influence of two plant extracts on broiler performance, digestibility, and digestive organ size. Poultry Sci 83(2):169-74 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.2.169
  8. Herpol C, Van Grembergen G 1967 La signification du pH dan le tube digestif de Gallus domesticus. Ann Bio Anim Biochem. Biophys 7:33-39 https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:19670104
  9. Izat AL, Adams MH, Cabel MC, Colberg M, Reiber MA, Skinner JT, Waldroup PW 1990 Eeffect of formic acid or calcium fomate in feed on performance and microbiological characteristics of broiler. Poultry Sci 69(11):1876-82 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0691876
  10. Kirchgesser M, Roth FX 1982 Fumaric acid as a feed additive in pig nutrition. Pig News Inf 3:259-264
  11. Lee KW, Everts H, Kappert HJ, Frehner M, Losa R, Beynen AC 2003 Effects of dietary essential oil components on growth performance digestive enzyme and lipid metabolism in female broiler chickens. Br Poultry Sci 44(3):450-7 https://doi.org/10.1080/0007166031000085508
  12. Lucy T 2002 Plant extracts to maintain poultry performance. Feed International 26-28
  13. Margartia NG, Magne S, Hanne O, Henning S 2004 Acidified litter benefits the intestinal flora balance broiler chickens. Appl Environ Microbial 70(9):5208-5213 https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.9.5208-5213.2004
  14. Mitsch P, Zitterl-Eglseer K, Kohler B, Gabler C, Losa R, Zimpernik L 2004 The effect of two different blends of essential oil component on the proliferation of Cl. perfringers in the intestines of broiler chickens. Poultry Sci 83(4): 669-75 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.4.669
  15. Mroz ZA, Jongbloed W, Partanen KH, Vreman K, Kemme PA, Kogut J 2000 The effect of calcium benzoate in diet with or without organic acid on dietary capacity, apparent digestibility, retention of nutrients, and manure characteristics in swine. J Animal Sci 78(10):2622-32 https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.78102622x
  16. NRC 1998 Nutrient Requirements of Poultry, National Research Council, National Academy of Science, Washington D.C
  17. Omogbenigun FO, Nyachoti CM, Slomimski BA 2003 The effect of supplementing microbial phytase and orgarnic acids to a corn-soy based fed to early-weaned pig. J Animal Sci 81:1806-1813 https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.8171806x
  18. Parttanen KH, Mroz Z 1991 Organic acid for performance enhancement in pig diet. Nutr Res Rev 117-145
  19. Rao CV, Ojha SK, Govindarajan R, Rawat AK, Mehrotra S, Pushpangadan P 2003 Quercetin, A bioflavonoid, protects against oxidative stress-related gastric mucosal damage in rat. Natural Product Science 9(2):68-72
  20. SAS Institute 1996 SAS/STAT$\circledR$ User's Guide. Release 6.12 Edition. S AS Institute Inc Cary Nc USA
  21. Son JH, Ragl D, Adeola O 2002 Quantification of digestive flow into the caeca. Br Poultry Sci 43(2)322-324 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660120121562
  22. Thompson JL, Hinton M 1997 Antibacterial activity of formic acid and propionic acid in the diet of hen on Salmonellas in the crop. Br Poultry Sci 38(1)59-65 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669708417941
  23. Wenk C 2003 Herb and botanicals as feed additives in monogastric animal. Asian-AustJ Animal Sci Vol(16)No 2:282- 289 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2003.282
  24. 박재홍 박강희 류경선 2002 유기산제와 효모 배양물 급여가 산란계의 생산성 및 계란의 품질에 미치는 영향. 한국가금학회지 29(2):109-115
  25. 박진홍 이미경 문형철 최근표 이서호 이현수 류이하 이강윤 이현용 2004 Echinacea purpurea L. 추출물 및 분획물의 암세포 독성. Korean J Medicinal Crop Sci 12(4): 309-314
  26. 석종찬 임희석 백인기 2003 사료중 Blended Essential Oil (CRINA)첨가가 육계의 생산성과 영양소 이용율, 소장내 미생물 균총 및 계육내 지방산 조성에 미치는 영향. 동물자원과학회지 45(5):777-786
  27. 윤병선 남기택 장경만 황선구 최일신 2005 목초액을 이용한 산란노계의 육질 개선 연구. 한국가금학회지 32(2):101- 106
  28. 홍성진 남궁환 백인기 2001 생약제제(Miracle$^\circledR$ 20)가 육계의 생산성과 영양소 이용율, 소장내 미생물 균총 및 면역기능에 미치는 영향. 동물자원과학회지 43(5):671-680