한국의류학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles)

  • 제30권6호
  • /
  • Pages.961-970
  • /
  • 2006
  • /
  • 1225-1151(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-0793(eISSN)
한국의류학회 (The Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles)
권호 표지

소비자 반품경험에 관한 탐색적 연구

An Exploratory Study of Consumer Return Experiences

  • 발행 : 2006.06.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study attempted to understand post-purchase consumer return experiences which had not received much attention in consumer behavior research. As a first step to understand return experiences from consumers' viewpoint, the study took an exploratory approach and identified themes and patterns from subjective consumer experiences. Whenever possible, attribution theory was applied to interpret the identified patterns. A total of 99 cases were collected from an open-ended questionnaire and analyzed based on a qualitative method. The reasons of product return was classified into five groups: changing mind; product defects; unsuitable products; products not expected; and for a better deal. External attribution was observed for return decisions caused by consumers' changed mind as well as by product defects. Dissatisfaction with defected products seemed to be intensified or reduced by service failure or success in the post-purchase service encounter. Consumer expectation and situations seemed to affect this process. Overall, the study supported attribution theory in the post-purchase return experience, and insights for research questions were proposed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 20대 여성 고객 불만 늘어. (2005, 6. 15.) 매일경제 인터넷 전자신문. 자료검색일 2005, 11. 2, 자료출처 http:// www.mk.co.kr
  2. 멋대로 반품 얌체족에 CJ홈쇼핑 택배료 부과. (2004, 8. 30). 매일경제신문. 자료검색일 2005, 11. 2, 자료출처 http:// www.mk.co.kr
  3. 박은주,정영옥. (2002). 의복충동구매행동에 대한 점포내 구매 상황과 감정적 요인의 영향. 한국의류학회지, 26(3/4). 379-389
  4. 인터넷 쇼핑몰 반품규정 멋대로. (2005, 10. 19). 국제신문. 자료검색일 2005, 11. 1, 자료출처 http://www.kookje.co.kr
  5. 전자상거래 분쟁, 연간 1천여건 발생. (2005, 9. 21). 연합뉴스 자료검색일 2005. 11. 1, 자료출처 http://www.donga.com
  6. 허경옥. (2003). 조사기간에 따른 소비자의 환불에 대한 태도 및 환불요청행동 차이. 한국생활과학회지, 12(3), 337-349
  7. Bitner, M. J. (1990). Evaluating service encounters: The effects of physical surroundings and employee responses. Journal of Marketing, 54(April), 69-82 https://doi.org/10.2307/1251871
  8. Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., & Mohr, L. A. (1994). Critical service encounters: The emplcyee's viewpoint. Journal of Marketing, 58(October), 95-1116 https://doi.org/10.2307/1251919
  9. Che, Y. (1996). Customer retura policies for experience goods. The Journal of Industrial Economics, XLIV(I), 17-24
  10. Davis, S., Gerstner, E., & Hagert, M. (1995). Money back guarantees in retailing: Matching products to consumer tastes. Journal of Retailing, 71(1), 7-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4359(95)90010-1
  11. Davis, S., Hagerty, M., & Gerstner, E. (1998). Return policies and optimal levels of hassle. Journal of Economics and Business, 50(5), 445-460 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-6195(98)00013-7
  12. Folks, V. S. (1984). Consumer reactions to product failures: An attributional approach. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(4),398-409 https://doi.org/10.1086/208978
  13. Folks, V. S. (1988). A recent aitribution research in consumer behavior: A review and new direction. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 548-565 https://doi.org/10.1086/209135
  14. Gonzalez, G. R., Hoffman, D., & Ingram, T. N. (2005). Improving relationship selling through failure analysis and recovery efforts: A fran ework and call to action. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 25(1),57-65
  15. Greenberg, M. (1995). Many unhappy returns: Retailers-and vendors too-try to curb the flow of goods coming back. HFN the Weekly Newspaper for the Home Furnishing Network, 69(5), 68-69
  16. How can vendors and retailers work to minimize product returns? (1995, 6. 31). HFN The Weekly Newspaper for the Home Furnishing Network 69(31), 56
  17. King, T. & Dennis, C. (2003). Interviews of deshopping behavior: An analysis of theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 31(3), 153-163 https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550310465558
  18. Kukar-Kinney, M. & Walters, R. G. (2003). Consumer perceptions of refund depth and competitive scope in price-matching guarantees: Effects on store patronage. Journal of Retailing, 79(3), 153-160 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(03)00038-1
  19. Laufer, D. (2002). Are antecedens of consumer dissatisfaction and consumer attributions for product failures universal? Advances in Consumer Research, 29, 312-317
  20. Many happy returns: A guide to taking back those ill-fitting, broken, or unwanted gifts. (1999). Consumer Reports. Jan, 38-40
  21. Many unhappy returns. (1995). Supermarket Business, 50(2), 69-70
  22. Oliver, R. (1997), Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer. New York: McGraw-Hill
  23. Oliver, R. & Desarbo, W. (1988). A response determinants in satisfaction judgements. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 495-507 https://doi.org/10.1086/209131
  24. Rosenbaum, M. S. & Kuntze, R. (2003). The relationship between anomie and unethical retail disposition. Psychology and Marketing, 20(12), 1067-1093 https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10109
  25. Rosenbaum, M. S. & Kuntze, R. (2005). Looking good at the retailer's expense: Investigating unethical retail disposition behavior among compulsive buyers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 12(3), 217-225 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2004.07.001
  26. Schroeder, C. L. (2005). Careful customer care: A sales assistant implie that the shopper was trying to cheat the store's. Gifts and Decorative Accessories, 106(5), 20-21
  27. Sopko, S. (1994, 1. 3). Many unhappy returns. HFD The Weekly Home Furnishings Newspaper, 68(1), 28-31
  28. Srivastava, J. & Lurie, N. (2001). A consumer perspective on price-matching refund policies: Effect on price perceptions and search behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(Sep),296-307 https://doi.org/10.1086/322904
  29. Stock, J., Speh, T., & Shear, H. (2002). Many happy returns. Harvard Business Review, July, 16-17
  30. Weiner, B. (2000). Attributional thoughts about consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(Dec), 382-387 https://doi.org/10.1086/317592