Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회지)

The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회)
권호 표지

Three Agencies of Trans-disciplinary Landscape Architecture: Aesthetics, Collaboration and The Ideas of Nature

조경 탈영역의 세가지 기제: 미학, 협업, 자연관

  • Published : 2006.04.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The increasing complexity of design disciplines expects new theoretical contribution to re-examine the territory of their own practice. The ambition of this paper is to theorize the possibilities of trans-disciplinary landscape architecture with the following three perspectives. First, it traces the canonical influence of Picturesque aesthetics as an agency to confirm the trans-disciplinary work at around-Olmsted period. Second, it investigates the evolving role of collaboration in contemporary Dutch landscape architectural context with the comparison to American modernist approaches to legitimate the trans-disciplinary mechanism. Third, it articulates three series of 'The-Idea-of-Nature' and the trans-disciplinary productions derived from each idea within a theoretical terrain of landscape architecture. And eventually, the author proposes 'multiplicity' of nature, replacing conventional concept of singular nature, to mobilize the location of this discipline and to project the possibility of new core ground beyond the existing theoretical gravity.

Keywords

References

  1. 배정한, 조정송(1999) 조경설계와 회화적 자연관의 문제. 한국조경학회지 27(3): 80-87
  2. 배정한(2005) 조경의 건축화. 환경과 조경 8: 106-111
  3. 조경진(1999) 조경드로잉의 변천과 의미에 관한 연구, 한국조경학회지 27(2): 140-151
  4. 조경진(2003) 프레데릭 로 옴스테드의 도시공원관에 대한 재해석, 한국조경학회지 30(6): 26-37
  5. 황기원(1986) 19세기 구미의 환경설계사 개관, 환경논총 18: 81-95
  6. 황기원(1995) 책같은 '도시, 도시같은 책, 서울: 열화당
  7. 황기원(2004) 한국 조경의 문화적 전통 시론. 환경논총 42: 55-81
  8. Andersson, T. (2004) A critical view of landscape architecture. Proceedings of ECLAS Conference 2004, A Critical Light on Landscape Architecture. Oslo: European Council of Landscape Architecture Schools
  9. Anthony, J. (1985) Joseph Paxton 1803-1865. Buckingham-shire: Shire Publication
  10. Baird, G. (2004) Criticality and its discontents. Harvard Design Magazine 21: 16-21
  11. Beardsley, J.(2000) A word for landscape architecture. Harvard Design Magazine 12: 56-63
  12. Bhabha, H. K.(1994) The location of Culture. London & New York: Routledge
  13. Breen, J. (2002) Design driven research. In T. M. de Jong, D. J. M., and der Voordt, eds., Ways to Study and Research Urban Architectural and Technical Design. Delft: Delft University Press
  14. Corner, J.(1991) A discourse on theory II: three tyannies of contemporary theory and the alternative of herrnaneutics. Landscape Journal 10(2): 115-133 https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.10.2.115
  15. Coupe, L.(2000) Romantic ecology and its legacy. In L. Coupe, ed., The Green Studies Reader. London & New York: Routledge. pp. 3-22
  16. Deleuze, G. (1986) Foucault. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
  17. Deleuze, G. and F. Guattari(1987) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
  18. Dunn, P. and L. Leeson (1997) The aesthetics of collaboration: Aesthetics and the body politics. Art Journal 17(1)
  19. Frampton, K. (1992) Modern Architecture: a Critical History. New York: Thames and Hudson
  20. Frampton, K. (2006) The work of architecture in the age of commodification. Harvard Design Magazine 23: 20-30
  21. Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowonthy, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow(1994) The New Production of Knowledge. Stockholm: Forskningsrafdamnden
  22. Giedion, S.(1980) Space, Time and Architecture. Cambidge: Harvard College
  23. Gomart, E.(2005) Political aesthetics. In L. Bruno, P. Weibel, eds., Making Thing Public. Cambridge: MIT Press. pp. 726-733
  24. Gropius, W.(1965) The New Architecture and the Bauhaus. Cambridge: MIT Press
  25. Hagenberg, R.(2004) 14 Japanese Architects. Tokyo: Geseobang
  26. Hasper, A.(1996) Foreword of First Yearbook, Landscape Architecture and Town Planning in the Netherlands 1993-1995. Brussel: Thoth
  27. Hohmann, H. and J. Langhorst(2005) A terminal case? an apocalyptic manifesto. Landscape Architecture Magazine 4: 26-34
  28. Horst. H. V. D.(1996) The Low Sky. Schiedam/Nuffic, Den Haag: Scriptum Books
  29. Hunt. J. D.(2000) Greater Perfections: .the Practice of Garden Theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press
  30. Johansson, F.(2004) The Medici Effect. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press
  31. Latour, B.(1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
  32. Le Gates, R. T. and F. Stout(1996) Urban planning history and visions. In R. T. Le Gates and F. Stout, eds., The City Reader(3rd ed.), London & New York: Routledge. pp. 299-353
  33. Lootsma, B.(1995) West8 Landscape Architecture. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers
  34. Klaus, S. L.(2002) A Modern Arcadia: Frederick Law Olmsted Jr. and the Plan for Forest Hills Gardens. Amherst & Boston: University of Massachusetts Press
  35. Koh, J.(1978) An Ecological Theory of Architecture. Unpublished Ph.D Dissertation. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
  36. Koh, J. (1987) Bridging the Gap between Architecture and Landscape Architecture. Proceeding of the Annual Meeting of the CELA at Rhode Island School of Design. Providence: Council of Educators in Landscape Architecture. 10-20
  37. Kruft, H. (1994) A History of Architectural Theory from Vitruvius to The Present New York: Princeton Architectural Press
  38. Marx, L.(1964) The Machine in the Garden. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  39. McInniss, J.(1984) Birkenhead Park. Merseyside: Birkenhead Press Limited
  40. Meyer, E.(1997) The expanded field of landscape architecture. In G. Thompson and F. Steiner, eds., Ecological Design and Planning. New York: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 45-79
  41. Newton, T. N. (1971) Design on the Land. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
  42. Nicolescu, B. (2001) Manifesto of Transdisciplinarity, Albany: State University of New York
  43. Riley, T.(2000) Book reviews: future natural. harvard Design Magazine 10: 83
  44. Ridderstrale, J. and K. Nordstrom(2000) Funky Business. London: Ft. com
  45. Ruskin, J.(1851) Reprinted in 1960, The Stone of Venice. New York: Da Capo Press
  46. Schulze, F.(1985) Mies van der Rohe, A Critical Biography. Chicago: The University of Chicago
  47. Schuyler, D.(1996) Apostle of Taste. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University
  48. Simo, M.(2001) The Offices of Hideo Sasaki. Berkeley: Spacemaker Press
  49. Smithson, A. (1974) Without Rhetorics: an Architectural Aesthetic 1955-1972. Cambridge: MlT press
  50. Soja, E. W.(1996) Third Space. Malden: Blackwell Publishers Inc
  51. Somol, R. and S. Whiting(2002) Notes around the doppler effect and other moods of modernism. Perspecta 33: 72-90 https://doi.org/10.2307/1567298
  52. Somol, R.(2005) Easer than Said. Berlage-Institute Lecture Series, Rethinking Representation
  53. Soper, K.(1995) What is Nature? Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Inc
  54. Spirn, A. W.(1984) The Granite Garden, Boston: Basic Books
  55. Speaks, M.(2003) Design Intelligence. Hunch Report #6/7 PP. 416-417
  56. Sijmond, D.(2002) Architecture+Nature=Landscape. Amsterdam: Colophon
  57. Tschumi, B.(1998) Architecture and Disjunction, Cambridge: MlT Press
  58. Tuan, Y. F.(1998) Escapism, Baltimore & London: The Johns Hopkins University Press
  59. Walker, P. and M. Simo(1994) Invisible Gardens. Cambridge: MlT Press
  60. Wesemael, P. V.(2001) Architecture of Instruction and Delight. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers