Browse > Article

Three Agencies of Trans-disciplinary Landscape Architecture: Aesthetics, Collaboration and The Ideas of Nature  

Park Yoon-Jin (Wageningen University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture / v.34, no.1, 2006 , pp. 48-58 More about this Journal
Abstract
The increasing complexity of design disciplines expects new theoretical contribution to re-examine the territory of their own practice. The ambition of this paper is to theorize the possibilities of trans-disciplinary landscape architecture with the following three perspectives. First, it traces the canonical influence of Picturesque aesthetics as an agency to confirm the trans-disciplinary work at around-Olmsted period. Second, it investigates the evolving role of collaboration in contemporary Dutch landscape architectural context with the comparison to American modernist approaches to legitimate the trans-disciplinary mechanism. Third, it articulates three series of 'The-Idea-of-Nature' and the trans-disciplinary productions derived from each idea within a theoretical terrain of landscape architecture. And eventually, the author proposes 'multiplicity' of nature, replacing conventional concept of singular nature, to mobilize the location of this discipline and to project the possibility of new core ground beyond the existing theoretical gravity.
Keywords
Trans-disciplinary; Canon of Aesthetics; Collaboration; Multiplicity of Nature;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Baird, G. (2004) Criticality and its discontents. Harvard Design Magazine 21: 16-21
2 Deleuze, G. (1986) Foucault. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
3 Deleuze, G. and F. Guattari(1987) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
4 Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowonthy, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow(1994) The New Production of Knowledge. Stockholm: Forskningsrafdamnden
5 Gomart, E.(2005) Political aesthetics. In L. Bruno, P. Weibel, eds., Making Thing Public. Cambridge: MIT Press. pp. 726-733
6 Hagenberg, R.(2004) 14 Japanese Architects. Tokyo: Geseobang
7 Horst. H. V. D.(1996) The Low Sky. Schiedam/Nuffic, Den Haag: Scriptum Books
8 Hunt. J. D.(2000) Greater Perfections: .the Practice of Garden Theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press
9 Simo, M.(2001) The Offices of Hideo Sasaki. Berkeley: Spacemaker Press
10 Spirn, A. W.(1984) The Granite Garden, Boston: Basic Books
11 Tschumi, B.(1998) Architecture and Disjunction, Cambridge: MlT Press
12 조경진(1999) 조경드로잉의 변천과 의미에 관한 연구, 한국조경학회지 27(2): 140-151
13 황기원(2004) 한국 조경의 문화적 전통 시론. 환경논총 42: 55-81
14 Corner, J.(1991) A discourse on theory II: three tyannies of contemporary theory and the alternative of herrnaneutics. Landscape Journal 10(2): 115-133   DOI
15 Koh, J. (1987) Bridging the Gap between Architecture and Landscape Architecture. Proceeding of the Annual Meeting of the CELA at Rhode Island School of Design. Providence: Council of Educators in Landscape Architecture. 10-20
16 Le Gates, R. T. and F. Stout(1996) Urban planning history and visions. In R. T. Le Gates and F. Stout, eds., The City Reader(3rd ed.), London & New York: Routledge. pp. 299-353
17 Frampton, K. (2006) The work of architecture in the age of commodification. Harvard Design Magazine 23: 20-30
18 Giedion, S.(1980) Space, Time and Architecture. Cambidge: Harvard College
19 Tuan, Y. F.(1998) Escapism, Baltimore & London: The Johns Hopkins University Press
20 Johansson, F.(2004) The Medici Effect. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press
21 Soja, E. W.(1996) Third Space. Malden: Blackwell Publishers Inc
22 황기원(1986) 19세기 구미의 환경설계사 개관, 환경논총 18: 81-95
23 배정한, 조정송(1999) 조경설계와 회화적 자연관의 문제. 한국조경학회지 27(3): 80-87
24 Gropius, W.(1965) The New Architecture and the Bauhaus. Cambridge: MIT Press
25 Klaus, S. L.(2002) A Modern Arcadia: Frederick Law Olmsted Jr. and the Plan for Forest Hills Gardens. Amherst & Boston: University of Massachusetts Press
26 Riley, T.(2000) Book reviews: future natural. harvard Design Magazine 10: 83
27 Lootsma, B.(1995) West8 Landscape Architecture. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers
28 Nicolescu, B. (2001) Manifesto of Transdisciplinarity, Albany: State University of New York
29 Walker, P. and M. Simo(1994) Invisible Gardens. Cambridge: MlT Press
30 Coupe, L.(2000) Romantic ecology and its legacy. In L. Coupe, ed., The Green Studies Reader. London & New York: Routledge. pp. 3-22
31 Wesemael, P. V.(2001) Architecture of Instruction and Delight. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers
32 Meyer, E.(1997) The expanded field of landscape architecture. In G. Thompson and F. Steiner, eds., Ecological Design and Planning. New York: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 45-79
33 Newton, T. N. (1971) Design on the Land. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
34 Soper, K.(1995) What is Nature? Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Inc
35 Andersson, T. (2004) A critical view of landscape architecture. Proceedings of ECLAS Conference 2004, A Critical Light on Landscape Architecture. Oslo: European Council of Landscape Architecture Schools
36 Dunn, P. and L. Leeson (1997) The aesthetics of collaboration: Aesthetics and the body politics. Art Journal 17(1)
37 Hasper, A.(1996) Foreword of First Yearbook, Landscape Architecture and Town Planning in the Netherlands 1993-1995. Brussel: Thoth
38 Schuyler, D.(1996) Apostle of Taste. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University
39 Marx, L.(1964) The Machine in the Garden. Oxford: Oxford University Press
40 배정한(2005) 조경의 건축화. 환경과 조경 8: 106-111
41 황기원(1995) 책같은 '도시, 도시같은 책, 서울: 열화당
42 Frampton, K. (1992) Modern Architecture: a Critical History. New York: Thames and Hudson
43 Koh, J.(1978) An Ecological Theory of Architecture. Unpublished Ph.D Dissertation. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
44 Breen, J. (2002) Design driven research. In T. M. de Jong, D. J. M., and der Voordt, eds., Ways to Study and Research Urban Architectural and Technical Design. Delft: Delft University Press
45 Latour, B.(1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
46 Smithson, A. (1974) Without Rhetorics: an Architectural Aesthetic 1955-1972. Cambridge: MlT press
47 Kruft, H. (1994) A History of Architectural Theory from Vitruvius to The Present New York: Princeton Architectural Press
48 Somol, R.(2005) Easer than Said. Berlage-Institute Lecture Series, Rethinking Representation
49 Sijmond, D.(2002) Architecture+Nature=Landscape. Amsterdam: Colophon
50 Anthony, J. (1985) Joseph Paxton 1803-1865. Buckingham-shire: Shire Publication
51 Ruskin, J.(1851) Reprinted in 1960, The Stone of Venice. New York: Da Capo Press
52 Ridderstrale, J. and K. Nordstrom(2000) Funky Business. London: Ft. com
53 Bhabha, H. K.(1994) The location of Culture. London & New York: Routledge
54 McInniss, J.(1984) Birkenhead Park. Merseyside: Birkenhead Press Limited
55 Beardsley, J.(2000) A word for landscape architecture. Harvard Design Magazine 12: 56-63
56 Speaks, M.(2003) Design Intelligence. Hunch Report #6/7 PP. 416-417
57 조경진(2003) 프레데릭 로 옴스테드의 도시공원관에 대한 재해석, 한국조경학회지 30(6): 26-37
58 Hohmann, H. and J. Langhorst(2005) A terminal case? an apocalyptic manifesto. Landscape Architecture Magazine 4: 26-34
59 Schulze, F.(1985) Mies van der Rohe, A Critical Biography. Chicago: The University of Chicago
60 Somol, R. and S. Whiting(2002) Notes around the doppler effect and other moods of modernism. Perspecta 33: 72-90   DOI