한국문헌정보학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science)

한국문헌정보학회 (Korean Society For Library And Information Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대학도서관의 BSC 적용에 관한 연구

A Study on Applying the BSC for University Libraries

  • Cho, Yoon-Hee (Visiting Faculty, College of Business Administration, University of Northern Iowa)
  • 발행 : 2006.03.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

오늘날과 같이 급변하는 환경 하에서 대학도서관이 유기적 조직으로써 다양한 변화에 신축적으로 적응하면서 조직의 총체적인 성과를 측정하기 위해서는 자원을 중심으로 한 양적평가와 서비스를 중심으로 한 질적평가 이외에도 자원 활용의 효율성이나 효과성, 서비스의 제공 능력이나 조직구성원의 잠재능력 등 경영전반에 걸친 균형적인 성과측정표의 개발이 필요하다. 본 연구는 Kaplan과 Norton이 개발한 BSC 모형을 비영리조직인 대학도서관에 적합하게 수정하여 고객, 자원, 내부 프로세스, 학습 성장의 네 관점으로 그 모형을 개발하고, 각 관점별 전략에 대한 전략지도와 측정지표를 개발하였다. 궁극적으로 본 연구는 대학도서관에 전략적 계획과 균형성과표를 연계하여 적용함으로써 대학도서관 조직의 전략적 계획에서 성과까지의 전체적이고 포괄적인 그림을 제시하는 전략적 통합 경영지표를 제시하고자 하였다.

The University libraries need to develop the balanced scorecard concerning general management in order to measure the total performance of the organization that measure not only quantity measurement based on resources and quality measurement based on information services but also effectiveness of resource utilization, efficiency ability providing the services and potential capability of the members adopting the diverse changes flexibility as organic organization under the rapidly changing circumstances nowadays. This study developed the BSC model into the four perspectives such as customer, resource, internal process, learning and growing modifying BSC model developed by Kaplan and Norton to fit university libraries as nonprofit organization and developed the strategic map and performance measurement indicators on the strategy of each perspective. Ultimately, this study tried to provide an integrated strategic management indicators providing comprehensive picture of university libraries from strategic plan to performance applying the BSC linking strategic plan.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 박재용, 조윤희. 2002. 정보화경영시스템의 도서관 적용에 관한 연구. '한국정보관리학회', 19(1): 115-134
  2. 조윤희, 박재용. 2000. 성공적인 도서관 경영혁신 방안에 관한 연구. '한국도서관.정보학회', 31(1): 143-165
  3. 조윤희. 2005a. 사명, 비전을 통해 본 대학도서관의 핵심 가치. '한국문헌정보학회', 40(4): 71-88
  4. 조윤희. 2005b. 대학도서관의 전략적 계획 내용 분석. '한국정보관리학회', 22(4): 111-128
  5. Blixrud, Julia C. 2003, E-metrics : next steps for measuring electronic resources. ARL bimonthly report 230/231. [online] [cited 2006. 1. 8].
  6. Ceynowa, Klaus. 2000. 'Managing academic information provision with the balanced scorecard : a project of the German Research Association.' Performance Measurement and Metrics, 1(3) : 157-164 https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007217
  7. CQU Library. 2005. Balanced scorecard. [online] [cited 2006. 1. 8].
  8. Cribb, Gulcin and Hogan, Chris. 2001. Bal- anced scorecard : linking strategic plan- ning to measurement and communication. [online] [cited 2006. 1. 8].
  9. Cribb, Gulcin. 2005. Human resource development : impacting on all four perspectives of the balanced scorecard. World Library and Information Congress : 71th IFLA General Conference and Council : Libraries a voyage of discovery. IFLA. [online] [cited 2006. 1. 8].
  10. ISO. 1998. ISO 11620 : Information and documentation Library performance indicators. Geneva : ISO
  11. ISO. 2003. ISO 2789 : Information and documentationInternational library statistics. Geneva : ISO
  12. ISO. 2003. ISO TR 20983 : Information and documentation Performance indicators for electronic library services. Geneva : ISO
  13. Kaplan, Robert S. and Norton, David R. 1992. 'The Balanced scorecard measures that drive performance.' Harvard Business Review, 70(1): 71-79
  14. Kaplan, Robert S. and Norton, David R. 1996. 'Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy.' California Management Review, 39(1): 53-79 https://doi.org/10.2307/41165876
  15. Matthews, Joseph R. 2003. 'Determining and communicating the value of the special library : valuing the balanced library scorecard.' Information Outlook, 7(3): 26-31
  16. Niven, Paul R. 2002. Balanced scorecard step by step. New York : John Wiley & Sons
  17. Pienaar, Heila and Penzhorn, Cecilia. 2000. 'Using the balanced scorecard to facilitate strategic management at an Academic information services.' Libri, 50: 202-209 https://doi.org/10.1515/LIBR.2000.202
  18. Poll, Roswitha. 2001. 'Performance, process and costs : managing service quality with the Balanced Scorecard.' Library Trends. 49(4): 709-717
  19. Poll, Roswitha. 2003. 'Managing service quality with the balanced scorecard.' Advances in Library Administration and Organization, 20: 213-227
  20. Self, Jim. 2003. Using data to make choices : the balanced scorecard at the University of Virginia Library. [online] [cited 2006. 1. 8].
  21. Self, Jim. 2004. 'Metrics and management : applying the results of the balanced scorecard.' Performance Measurement and Metrics, 5(3): 101-105
  22. University of Virginia Library. 2005. Balanced scorecard at UVa Library. [online] [cited 2006. 1. 8].

피인용 문헌

  1. A Study on Trends of Library Management Research in Korea: Focused on Academic Papers 2004~2013 vol.48, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2014.48.4.025