DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Modeling Satellite Orbital Segments using Orbit-Attitude Models

  • Kim Tae-Jung (Dept. of Geoinformatic Engineering, Inha University)
  • Published : 2006.02.01

Abstract

Currently, in order to achieve accurate geolocation of satellite images we need to generate control points from individual scenes. This requirement increases the cost and processing time of satellite mapping greatly. In this paper we investigate the feasibility of modeling entire image strips that has been acquired from the same orbital segments. We tested sensor models based on satellite orbit and attitude with different sets of unknowns. We checked the accuracy of orbit modeling by establishing sensor models of one scene using control points extracted from the scene and by applying the models to adjacent scenes within the same orbital segments. Results indicated that modeling of individual scenes with $2^{nd}$ order unknowns was recommended. In this case, unknown parameters were position biases, drifts, accelerations and attitude biases. Results also indicated that modeling of orbital segments with zero-degree unknowns was recommended. In this case, unknown parameters were attitude biases.

Keywords

References

  1. ASPRS, 2004. 'Manual of Photogrammetry (5th Edition)', J.C. McGlone (Editor)
  2. Bang, K-I. and Cho, W-S., 2001. Pseudo Image Composition and Sensor Models Analysis of SPOT Satellite Imagery for Inaccessibe Area, Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, 17(1): 33-44 https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2001.17.1.33
  3. Dial, G. and Grodecki, J., 2002. 'Block Adjustment with Rational Polynomial Camera Models', Proc. of ACSM-ASPRS 2002 Annual Conference
  4. Dowman, I.(Editor), 1991. Test of Triangulation of SPOT Data, European Organization for Experimental Photogrammetric Research, 26
  5. Emery, W. J., Baldwin, D., and Matthews, D., 2003. 'Maximum Cross Correlation Automatic Satellite Image Navigation and Attitude Corrections for Open-Ocean Image Navigation', IEEE Trans. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(1): 33-42 https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2002.808061
  6. Gugan, D. J. and Dowman, I. J., 1988. 'Accuracy and completeness of topographic mapping from SPOT imagery', Photogrammetric Record, 12(72): 787-796 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9730.1988.tb00629.x
  7. Gupta, R. and Hartley, R., 1997. 'Linear pushbroom cameras', IEEE Trans. PAMI, 19(9): 963-975 https://doi.org/10.1109/34.615446
  8. Kim, T., 2005. 'Investigation on the Accuracy of bundle Adjustments and Exterior Orientation Parameter Estimation of Linear Pushbroom Sensor Models', Journal of Korean Surveying Society, 23(2): 137-145
  9. Konecny, G., Lohmann, P., Engel, H., and Kruck, E., 1987. 'Evaluation of SPOT imagery on analytical photogrammetric instruments', Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 53(9): 1223-1230
  10. Orun, A. B. and Natarajan, K., 1994. 'A modified bundle adjustment software for SPOT imagery and photography: Tradeoff', Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60(12): 1431-143
  11. Radhadevi, P. V., Ramachandran, R., and Mohan, M., 1998. 'Restitution of IRS-1C PAN data using an orbit attitude model and minimum control', ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 53(1998): 262-271 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2716(98)00010-0
  12. Salamonowicz, P. H., 1986. 'Satellite orientation and position for geometric correction of scanner imagery', Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 52(4): 491-499
  13. SPOT Image, 1997. 'The SPOT Scene Standard Digital Product Format', S4-ST-73-01-SI
  14. SPOT Image, 2002. 'SPOT Satellite Geomtry Handbook', S-NT-73-12-SI
  15. Wertz, J. R. (Editor), 1978. Spacecraft Attitude Determination and Control, Kluwer Academic Publishers
  16. Westin, T., 1990. 'Precision Rectification of SPOT Imagery', Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 56(2): 247-253
  17. Wolff, T., 1985. 'An image geometry model for METEOSAT', Int. J. Remote Sensing, 6(10): 1599-1606 https://doi.org/10.1080/01431168508948308