Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2006.22.1.63

Modeling Satellite Orbital Segments using Orbit-Attitude Models  

Kim Tae-Jung (Dept. of Geoinformatic Engineering, Inha University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Remote Sensing / v.22, no.1, 2006 , pp. 63-73 More about this Journal
Abstract
Currently, in order to achieve accurate geolocation of satellite images we need to generate control points from individual scenes. This requirement increases the cost and processing time of satellite mapping greatly. In this paper we investigate the feasibility of modeling entire image strips that has been acquired from the same orbital segments. We tested sensor models based on satellite orbit and attitude with different sets of unknowns. We checked the accuracy of orbit modeling by establishing sensor models of one scene using control points extracted from the scene and by applying the models to adjacent scenes within the same orbital segments. Results indicated that modeling of individual scenes with $2^{nd}$ order unknowns was recommended. In this case, unknown parameters were position biases, drifts, accelerations and attitude biases. Results also indicated that modeling of orbital segments with zero-degree unknowns was recommended. In this case, unknown parameters were attitude biases.
Keywords
Sensor model; Orbit modeling; SPOT; Orbit-attitude model;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Dial, G. and Grodecki, J., 2002. 'Block Adjustment with Rational Polynomial Camera Models', Proc. of ACSM-ASPRS 2002 Annual Conference
2 Dowman, I.(Editor), 1991. Test of Triangulation of SPOT Data, European Organization for Experimental Photogrammetric Research, 26
3 Gupta, R. and Hartley, R., 1997. 'Linear pushbroom cameras', IEEE Trans. PAMI, 19(9): 963-975   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Konecny, G., Lohmann, P., Engel, H., and Kruck, E., 1987. 'Evaluation of SPOT imagery on analytical photogrammetric instruments', Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 53(9): 1223-1230
5 Orun, A. B. and Natarajan, K., 1994. 'A modified bundle adjustment software for SPOT imagery and photography: Tradeoff', Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60(12): 1431-143
6 Wertz, J. R. (Editor), 1978. Spacecraft Attitude Determination and Control, Kluwer Academic Publishers
7 Wolff, T., 1985. 'An image geometry model for METEOSAT', Int. J. Remote Sensing, 6(10): 1599-1606   DOI   ScienceOn
8 ASPRS, 2004. 'Manual of Photogrammetry (5th Edition)', J.C. McGlone (Editor)
9 Emery, W. J., Baldwin, D., and Matthews, D., 2003. 'Maximum Cross Correlation Automatic Satellite Image Navigation and Attitude Corrections for Open-Ocean Image Navigation', IEEE Trans. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(1): 33-42   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Radhadevi, P. V., Ramachandran, R., and Mohan, M., 1998. 'Restitution of IRS-1C PAN data using an orbit attitude model and minimum control', ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 53(1998): 262-271   DOI   ScienceOn
11 SPOT Image, 2002. 'SPOT Satellite Geomtry Handbook', S-NT-73-12-SI
12 Salamonowicz, P. H., 1986. 'Satellite orientation and position for geometric correction of scanner imagery', Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 52(4): 491-499
13 Gugan, D. J. and Dowman, I. J., 1988. 'Accuracy and completeness of topographic mapping from SPOT imagery', Photogrammetric Record, 12(72): 787-796   DOI
14 Westin, T., 1990. 'Precision Rectification of SPOT Imagery', Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 56(2): 247-253
15 Kim, T., 2005. 'Investigation on the Accuracy of bundle Adjustments and Exterior Orientation Parameter Estimation of Linear Pushbroom Sensor Models', Journal of Korean Surveying Society, 23(2): 137-145   과학기술학회마을
16 SPOT Image, 1997. 'The SPOT Scene Standard Digital Product Format', S4-ST-73-01-SI
17 Bang, K-I. and Cho, W-S., 2001. Pseudo Image Composition and Sensor Models Analysis of SPOT Satellite Imagery for Inaccessibe Area, Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, 17(1): 33-44   DOI