대한교통학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Transportation)

  • 제24권5호
  • /
  • Pages.45-56
  • /
  • 2006
  • /
  • 1229-1366(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-4217(eISSN)
대한교통학회 (Korean Society of Transportation)
권호 표지

거리함수를 이용한 한국 철도산업의 생산특성 및 효율성 분석

Production Characteristics and Efficiency of Korean Railroad Industry using a Distance Function

  • 발행 : 2006.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

우리나라 철도산업의 생산특성과 효율성에 관하여 충분히 검토된 양질의 정보가 축적되기 위해서는 다양한 각도에서 다양한 방법으로 검토가 필요하다. 본 논문에서는 거리함수를 이용한 우리나라 철도산업의 생산특성 및 기술효율성 분석결과를 제시한다. Shephard(1953)가 처음 소개한 거리함수는 가격에 관한 정보를 필요로 하지 않는다. 따라서 가격에 관한 자료를 구하기 어렵거나 또는 공공부문의 경우처럼 가격에 대한 통제가 존재하는 상황에서 효과적인 분석수단이 될 수 있다. 또한 다수투입 다수산출 생산기술을 다룰 수 있으며 생산특성과 효율성을 동시에 분석할 수 있는 장점을 갖고 있다. 한국철도의 1963년부터 2004년까지의 연도별 자료로부터 이차계획법모형을 사용하여 거리함수를 추정하였다. 추정된 기술효율성은 1980년 이후 2004년까지 점진적으로 개선되고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 간접 Morishima대체탄력성 추정결과는 노동을 다른 투입으로 대체하는 것이 매우 어렵거나 또는 불가능한 것으로 나타났다. 평균 규모탄력성은 2.7로 나타났으며 이는 규모를 1%증가시켰을 때 산출이 2.7%증가함을 의미한다. 즉 한국철도에 규모의 경제가 존재함을 의미한다.

In order to construct an information pool on the production characteristics and efficiency of Korean railroad industry, various alternative approaches have to be applied. In this paper we present an empirical application of the distance function to measure the technical efficiency and the production characteristics of Korean railroad industry, The distance function firstly introduced by Shephard (1953) provides the advantage that it does not need information about prices, so it can accommodate the multiple output nature of the railway only using the quantifies as data. This is of great relevance in the context of the public sector such as railroad industry where there are often distinct control mechanisms on input prices. Also the distance function allows us to obtain a measure of technical efficiency as well as a measure of production characteristics. From annual data on Korean railroad industry during 1964-2004, multiple output distance function is estimated using quadratic programming model. The resulting technical efficiency estimates has tended to be improved over the period $1980{\sim}2004$. The indirect Morishima elasticities of substitution indicate that the substitutabilities for labor are relatively very low or impossible. The average scale elasticity is 2.7 which means that increasing the scale by 1per cent will result in an output increase by 2.7 percent. This result indicates that economies of scale are present in the Korean railroad industry.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김성호.홍순흠.최태성 (2000), '한국철도의 상 대적 운영효율성 평가,' 한국철도학회 2000년도 추계학술대회 논문집, pp.17-23
  2. 박진경.김성수 (2004), '일반초월대수 비용함수 모형을 이용한 한국 철도산업의 규모 및 범위의 경 제성 분석,' 대한교통학회지, 제22권 제6호, 대한 교통학회, pp.159-173
  3. 배양선 (1998), '한국 철도산업의 규모 및 범위의 경제성 분석,' 서울대학교 환경대학원 석사학위논문
  4. 이재훈.정경훈 (2004), 우리나라 철도산업의 효 율성 분석, 교통개발연구원
  5. 유재균.최진석 (2000), '우리나라 철도운영체의 효율성에 관한 연구,' 한국철도학회 2000년도 추계학술대회 논문집, pp.24-31
  6. 하헌구.이경미 (2002), '우리나라 철도산업의 비용특성에 관한 연구', 교통개발연구원
  7. Aigner, D. J., and S. F. Chu (1968), 'On Estimating the Industry Production Function', American Economic Review, Vol. 58, No. 4, pp.826-839
  8. Andrikopoulos, A. A., and J. Loizides (1998), 'Cost Structure and Productivity Growth in European Railway Systems', Applied Economics, Vol. 30, No. 12, pp.1625-1639 https://doi.org/10.1080/000368498324706
  9. Banos-Pino, J., V. Fernandez-Blanco, and A. Rodriguez-Alvarez (2002), 'The Allocative Efficiency Measure by means of a Distance Function: The Case of Spanish Public Railways', European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 137, No. 1, pp.191-205 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00067-4
  10. Blackorby, C., and R. R. Russell (1981), 'The Morishima Elasticity of Substitution: Symmetry, Consistency, Separability, and its Relationship to the Hicks and Allen Elasticity', Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 48, No. 151, pp.147-158 https://doi.org/10.2307/2297127
  11. Blackorby, C., and R. R. Russell (1989), 'Will the Real Elasticity of Substitution Please Stand Up? (A Comparison of the Allen/Uzawa and Morishima Elasticities)', American Economic Review, Vol. 79, No. 4, pp.882-888
  12. Bosco, B. (1996), 'Excess-Input Expenditure Estimated by Means of an Input-Distance Function: The Case of Public Railways', Applied Economics, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp.491-497 https://doi.org/10.1080/000368496328623
  13. Cantos, P. (2000), 'A Subadditivity Test for the Cost Function of the Principal European Railways', Transport Reviews, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp.275-290 https://doi.org/10.1080/014416400412814
  14. Cantos, P., and J. Maudos (2001), 'Regulation and Efficiency: the Case of European Railways', Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp.459-472 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(00)00007-0
  15. Cantos, P., J. M. Pastor, and L. Serrano (1999), 'Productivity, Efficiency and Technical Change in the European Railways: A Non- Parametric Approach', Transportation, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp.337-357 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005127513206
  16. Cantos, P., J. M. Pastor, and L. Serrano (2002), 'Cost and Revenue Inefficiences in the European Railways', International Journal of Transport Economics, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp.55-75
  17. Christensen, L. R., D. W. Jorgenson, and L. J. Lau (1973), 'Transcendental Logarithmic Production Frontiers', Review of Economics & Statistics, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp.28-45 https://doi.org/10.2307/1927992
  18. Coelli, T., and S. Perelman (1999), 'A Comparison of Parametric and Non-parametric Distance Functions: With Application to European Railways', European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 117, pp.326-339 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00271-9
  19. Coelli, T., and S. Perelman (2000), 'Technical Efficiency of European Railways: A Distance Function Approach', Applied Economics, Vol. 32, No. 15, pp.1967-976 https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840050155896
  20. Fare, R. and S. Grosskopf (1990), 'A Distance Function Approach to Price Efficiency', Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp.123-126 https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(90)90054-L
  21. Fare, R., and D. Primont (1995), Multi-output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers
  22. Farrell, M. J. (1957), 'The Measurement of Productive Efficiency', Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, General, Vol. 120, No. 3, pp.253-281 https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100
  23. Farsi, M., M. Filippini, and W. Greene (2005), 'Efficiency Measurement in Network Industries: Application to the Swiss Railway Companies', Journal of Regulatory Economics Vol. 28, No. 1, pp.69-90 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-005-2356-9
  24. Fourer, R., D. M. Gay, and B. W. Kernighan (1993), AMPL: A Modeling Language For Mathematical Programming, Massachusetts: Scientific Press
  25. Fuss, M., D. McFadden, and Y. Mundlak (1978), 'A Survey of Functional Forms in the Economic Analysis of Production', in M. Fuss, D. McFadden, and Y. Mundlak, eds. Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications, Volume I. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, pp.219-268
  26. Gathon, H. J., and P. Pestieau (1995), 'Decomposing Efficiency into Its Managerial and Its Regulatory Components: The Case of European Railways', European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 80, No. 3, pp.500-507 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)00133-W
  27. Grosskopf, S., K. Hayes, and J. Hirschberg (1995), 'Fiscal Stress and the Production of Public Safety: A Distance Function Approach', Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp.277-296 https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(94)01445-T
  28. Grosskopf, S., D. Margaritis, and V. Valdmanis (1995), 'Estimating Output Substitutability of Hospital Services: A Distance Function Approach', European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 80, No. 3, pp.575-587 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)00138-3
  29. Kumbhakar, S. C. (1989), 'Economic Performance of US Class 1 Railroads: A Stochastic Frontier Approach', Applied Economics, Vol. 21, No. 11, pp.1433-1446 https://doi.org/10.1080/758516013
  30. Kwak, N. K., T.-S. Choi, and S. Kim (2004), 'Evaluating the Relative Efficiency of Railways Operations using Data Envelopment Analysis', in K. D. Lawrence, ed., Applications of Management Science: Mathmatical Programming, Volume 11. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp.77-88
  31. Loizides, J. and E. G. Tsionas (2002), 'Productivity Growth in European Railways: A New Approach', Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 36, No. 7, pp.633-644 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(01)00027-1
  32. Mancuso, P., and P. Reverberi (2003), 'Operating Costs and Market Organization in Railway Services: The case of Italy, 1980-1995', Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp.43-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(01)00044-3
  33. McFadden, D. (1978), 'Cost, Revenue, and Profit Functions', in M. Fuss, D. McFadden, and Y. Mundlak, eds., Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications, Volume I. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, pp.3-109
  34. Mizutani, F. (2004), 'Privately Owned Railways' Cost Function, Organization Size and Ownership', Journal of Regulatory Economics, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp.297-322 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:REGE.0000017751.07079.75
  35. Oum, T. H., and C. Yu (1994), 'Economic Efficiency of Railways and Implications for Public Policy: A Comparative Study of the OECD Countries' Railways', Journal of Transport Economics & Policy, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp.121-138
  36. Oum, T. H., and W. G. I. Waters (1996), 'A Survey of Recent Developments in Transportation Cost Function Research', Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp.423-464
  37. Parisio, L. (1999), 'A Comparative Analysis of European Railroads Efficiency: A Cost Frontier Approach', Applied Economics, Vol. 31, No. 7, pp.815-823 https://doi.org/10.1080/000368499323788
  38. Perelman, S., and P. Pestieau (1988), 'Technical Performance in Public Enterprises: A Comparative Study of Railways and Postal Services', European Economic Review, Vol. 32, No. 2-3, pp.432-441 https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(88)90188-2
  39. Savage, I. (1997), 'Scale Economies in United States Rail Transit Systems', Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp.459-473 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(97)00003-7
  40. Shephard, R. W. (1953), Cost and Production Functions, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
  41. Varian, H. R. (1992), Microeconomic Analysis, Third Edition, New York: W. W. Norton & Company
  42. Wang, S.-E., and C.-H. Liao (2005), 'Cost Structure and Productivity Growth of the Taiwan Railway', Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, (forthcoming)