References
- European Society of Endodontology. Consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology on quality guidelines for endodontic treatment. Int Endod J 27:115-124, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1994.tb00240.x
- Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 18:269-296, 1974
- Al-Omari MAO, Dummer PMH, Newcombe RG. Comparison of six files to prepare simulated root canals. Part 2. Int Endod J 25:67-81, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1992.tb00739.x
- Briseno BM, Sonnabend E. The Influence of different root canal instruments on root canal preparation: an in vitro study. Int Endod J 24:15-23, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1991.tb00865.x
- Schafer E, Tepal J, Hoppe W. Properties of endodontic hand instruments used in rotary motion. Part 2. Instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod 21:493-497, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80519-4
- Abou-Rass M, Frank AL, Glick DH. The anticurvature filing method to prepare the curved root canal. J Am Dent Assoc 101(5):792-794, 1980 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1980.0427
- Walia H, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod 14:346-351, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80196-1
- Camps JJ, Pertot WJ. Tortional and stiffness properties of nickel-titanium K-files. Int Endod J 28:239-243, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1995.tb00307.x
- Schafer E. Root canal instruments for manual use: a review. Endod Dent Traumatol 13:51-64, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1997.tb00011.x
- Glosson CR, Hallor RH, Dove SB, del Rio CE. A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine driven and K-Flex endodontic instruments. J Endod 21:146-151, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80441-3
- Schafer E. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary Nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 92(2):215-220, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2001.114622
- Hata G, Demura M, Kato AS, Imura N, Novo NF, Toda T. A comparison of shaping ability using ProFile, GT file, and Flex-R endodontic instruments in simulated canals. J Endod 28(4):316-321, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200204000-00014
- Ankrum MT, Hartwell GR, Trutt JE. K3 Endo, ProTaper, and ProFile systems: breakage and distortion in severely curved root of molars. J Endod 30(4):234-237, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200404000-00013
- Ruddle CJ. The ProTaper Technique: Endodontics Made Easier. Dent Today 20(11):58-68, 2001
- Thomas Clauder, Michael A, Baumann. ProTaper NT system. Dent Clin North Am 48:87-111, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2003.10.006
- Peters OA, Peters CI, Schoneberger K, Barbakov F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation : effect of canal anatomy on final shape analyzed by micro CT. Int Endod J 36:86-92, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00626.x
- CH Lee, KM Cho, CU Hong. Effect of various canal preparation techniques using rotary Nickel-Titanium files on the maintenance of canal curvature. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 28(1):41-49, 2003 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.1.041
- Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 32(2):271-275, 1971 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(71)90230-1
- Bergmans L, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Beullens M, Wevers M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechs P. Progressive versus constant tapered shaft design using NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 36:288-295, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00650.x
- Tulsa Dental Products. ProTaper manufacturer's instructions for use. Tulsa; Tulsa Dental Products, 2001
- Michael Szasz GDP. ProTaper for hand use-The Experience of a GDP. Dentsply united kingdom - articles (http://www.dentsply.co.uk)
- Julien Webber. Hand ProTaper-Shaping the Future. Dentsply united kingdom - articles (http://www.dentsply.co.uk)
- Berutti E, Chiandussi G, Bavaglio I, Ibba A. Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: ProTaper versus ProFile. J Endod 29(1):15-19, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200301000-00005
- Calberson FL, Deroose CA, Hommez GM, De Moor RJ. Shping ability of ProTaper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin root canals. Int Endod J 37:613-623, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00860.x
- Iqbal MK, Firic S, Tulcan J, Karabucak B, Kim S. Comparison of apical transportation between ProFile and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 37:359-364, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00792.x
- Yoshimine Y, Ono M, Akamine A. The shaping effects of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated s-shaped canals. J Endod 31(5):373-375, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000140568.40462.43
- Schafer E, Vlassis M. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 37:229-238, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00786.x
- Yun H, Kim SK. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 95:228-233, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2003.92