Selenium의 첨가가 육계 및 산란계의 생산성 및 축적에 미치는 효과

Effects of Dietary Selenium Sources on Performance and Selenium Retention in Broiler Chickens and Laying Hens

  • 나재천 (축산연구소 축산자원개발부 가금과) ;
  • 김상호 (축산연구소 축산자원개발부 가금과) ;
  • 장병귀 (축산연구소 축산자원개발부 가금과) ;
  • 김지혁 (축산연구소 축산자원개발부 가금과) ;
  • 유동조 (축산연구소 축산자원개발부 가금과) ;
  • 이덕수 (축산연구소 축산자원개발부 가금과) ;
  • 이상진 (축산연구소 축산자원개발부) ;
  • 이종찬 (대성미생물연구소) ;
  • 이원준 (대성미생물연구소)
  • Na, J.C. (Poultry Science Division, National Livestock Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, S.H. (Poultry Science Division, National Livestock Research Institute) ;
  • Jang, B.G. (Poultry Science Division, National Livestock Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, J.H. (Poultry Science Division, National Livestock Research Institute) ;
  • Yu, D.J. (Poultry Science Division, National Livestock Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, D.S. (Poultry Science Division, National Livestock Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, S.J. (Livestock Resources Development Department, National livestock Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, J.C. (Daesung Microbiological Labs. Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Lee, W.J. (Daesung Microbiological Labs. Co., Ltd.)
  • 발행 : 2006.09.01

초록

셀레늄의 첨가가 육계 및 산란계의 생산성과 축적에 미치는 영향을 구명하기 위하여 2차례의 실험을 수행하였다. 실험 1은 무기태 selenium 0.12, 0.24 ppm과 유기태 selenium 0.12, 0.24 및 0.6 ppm의 첨가가 육계의 사료 섭취량, 증체량, 사료 요구율 및 닭고기 내 selenium 축적에 미치는 영향을 조사하였다. 시험 전 기간의 증체량은 무기태 0.24 ppm 첨가구보다 유기태 selenium 0.24와 0.60 ppm 첨가구에서 높았다(P<0.05). 그러나 사료 섭취량과 사료 요구율은 대조구, 무기태 및 유기태 selenium의 첨가 수준에 의한 차이는 없었다. 가슴과 다리근육의 selenium 함량은 대조구에 비하여 유기태와 무기태 selenium 첨가구가 높았으며(P<0.05), 유기태 selenium의 첨가 수준에 따른 차이는 있으나(P<0.05), 무기태 selenium의 첨가 수준에 따른 차이는 없었다. 실험 2에서는 산란계 사료에 무기태 selenium 0.06, 0.12 ppm과 유기태 selenium 0.06, 0.12 및 0.30 ppm의 첨가하여 급여시에 산란율, 사료 섭취량, 사료 요구율, 난질 및 계란 내 selenium 함량에 미치는 영향을 조사하였다. 사료 요구율은 무기태 0.06 ppm 첨가구가 대조구보다 유의적으로 개선되었으나(P<0.05), 산란율, 난중, 1일 산란량, 사료 섭취량은 대조구, 무기태 및 유기태 selenium의 첨가 수준에 따른 차이는 없었다. Haugh unit는 모든 처리구에서 차이가 없었으며, 난황색은 유기태 selenium 0.30 ppm 첨가구가 대조구를 포함한 다른 처리구에 비하여 높았다(P<0.05). 난각 강도는 유기태 selenium 0.06 ppm 첨가구가 높았다.(P<0.05). 그러나 난각 두께는 대조구를 포함한 모든 처리구에서 차이는 없었다. 계란 중의 selenium 함량은 대조구에 비하여 selenium을 첨가한 모든 처리구에서 높았다(P<0.05). 이외에도 사료내 selenium 첨가 수준에 비례하여 계란에서 selenium 축적량도 증가하였으며(P<0.05), 특히 유기태 selenium 이 무기태 selenium보다 효과적이었다.

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of dietary selenium sources on performance and selenium retention in broiler chickens and laying hens. In experiment 1, the effects of dietary selenium sources and levels on the weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion, and selenium retention of meat in broiler chickens were investigated. for each growth phase, the basal diet was supplemented with 0 (control), 0.12 and 0.24 ppm Se from sodium selenite (SS) and 0.12, 0.24 and 0.60 ppm Se from selenium yeast(SY). Weight gain was significantly increased(P<0.05) in supplemental 0.24 and 0.60 ppm SY compared to the 0.24 ppm SS by diet during day 1 to 35, but feed intake and feed conversion were not affected by the source or the level of Se. Selenium concentrations of breast and leg muscle were significantly increased(P<0.05) in supplemental SS and SY compared to the control, and linearly increased(P<0.05) as dietary. Se level increased by SY, but there was no difference in supplemental 0.12 ppm SS compared to 0.24 ppm SS. In experiment 2, 12-week-experiment using Hy-Line laying hens(31 wk of age) was conducted to compare the effects of selenium sources and levels on egg production, egg weight, daily egg mass, feed intake, feed conversion, egg quality, and selenium retention of egg in laying hens. A corn-soybean meal basal diet was supplemented with 0 (control), 0.06 and 0.12 ppm Se from sodium selenite (SS) and 0.06, 0.12 and 0.30 ppm Se from selenium yeast(SY). Feed conversion was significantly improved(P<0.05) in supplemental 0.06 ppm SS compared to the control, but egg production, egg weight, daily egg mass, and feed intake were not affected by source and level of Se. Haugh unit was not affected by source or level of Se. Yolk color was significantly(P<0.05) higher in supplemental 0.3 ppm SY compared to the control and other supplement in week 12. Eggshell breaking strength was significantly(P<0.05) higher in supplemental 0.06 ppm SY(P<0.05). Thickness of eggshell was not affected by source or level of Se. Se concentrations of egg was significantly improved(P<0.05) in supplemental SS and SY compared to the control, and was significantly increased(P<0.05) as dietary Se level increased by SS and SY, especially SY more effective compared to the SS.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Awasthi YC, Beutler E, Srivastava SK 1975 Purification and properties of human erythrocytes glutathione peroxidase. J Biol Chem 250:5144-5149
  2. Brown KM, Arthur JR 2001 Selenium, selenoproteins, and human health: A review. Public Health Nutrition 4: 593-599
  3. Cantor AH, Moorehead PD, Musser MA 1982 Comparative effects of sodium selenite and selenomethionine upon nutritional muscular dystrophy, selenium-dependent glutathione peroxidase, and tissue selenium concentrations of turkey poults. Poult Sci 61:478-484 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0610478
  4. Cantor AH, Scott ML 1974 The effect of selenium in the hen's diet on egg production, hatchability, performance of progeny and selenium concentration in eggs. Poultry Sci 53:1870-1880 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0531870
  5. Cantor AH, Straw ML, Ford MJ, Pescatore AJ, Dunlap MK 2000 Effect of feeding organic selenium in diets of laying hens on egg selenium content. Page 473 in Egg Nutrition and Biotechnology. JS Sim, S Nakai, and W Guenter, ed. CABI Publishing, New York, NY
  6. Choct M, Naylor AJ, Reinke N 2004 Selenium supplementation affects broiler growth performance, meat yield and feather coverage. Br Poult Sci 45(5):677-683 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660400006495
  7. Duncan DB 1955 Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11:1
  8. Echevarria MG, Henry PR, Ammerman CB, Rao PV, Miles RD 1988a Estimation of the relative bioavailability of inorganic selenium sources for poultry. 1. Effect of time and high dietary selenium on tissue selenium uptake. Poult Sci 67(9):1295-1301 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0671295
  9. Echevarria MG, Henry PR, Ammerman CB, Rao PV, Miles RD 1988b Estimation of the relative bioavailability of inorganic selenium sourees for poultry. 2. Tissue uptake of selenium from high dietary selenium concentrations. Poult Sci 67(11):1585-1592 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0671585
  10. Edens FW, Carter TA, Parkhurst CR, Sefton AE 2000 Effect of selenium source and litter type on broiler feathering. J Appl Poultry Res 9:407-413 https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/9.3.407
  11. Flohe L, Guenzler W, Schock HM 1973 Glutathion peroxidases: A Selenoenzymes. FEBS Lett 32:132-134 https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(73)80755-0
  12. Klecker D, Zeman L, Bunesova A, Siske V 1999 Effect of organic selenium, zinc, and manganese on reproductive traits of laying hens and cockerels. Pages 183-185 in: Eggs and Egg Products Quality. Proceedings of 8th European Symposium on the Quality of Eggs and Egg Products. World's Poult Sci Assoc, Bologna, Italy
  13. Kuricova S, Boldizarova K, Gresakova L, Bobcek R, Levkut M, Leng L 2003 Chicken selenium status when fed a diet supplemented with se-yeast. Acta Vet Brno 72:339-346 https://doi.org/10.2754/avb200372030339
  14. Matek M, Blanusa M 1998 Comparison of two methods for destruction of biological material for determination of selenium. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 49(4):301-305
  15. Navaro-alarcon N, Lopez-Martinez MC 2000 Essentiality of selenium in the human body: relationship with different disease. Sci Total Environ 249: 347-371 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00526-4
  16. NRC 1994 Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th rev ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
  17. Patton ND 2001 Organic selenium in the nutrition of laying hens: Effects on egg selenium content, egg quality and transfer to developing chick embryos. Ph.D. Diss., Univ. Kentucky, Lexington
  18. Patton ND, Cantor AH, Pescatore AJ, Ford MJ, Smith CA 2002 The effect of dietary selenium source and level on the uptake of selenium by developing chick embryos. Poultry Science 81:1548-1554 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.10.1548
  19. Payne RL, Lavergne TK, Southern LL 2005 Effect of inorganic versus organic selenium on hen production and egg selenium concentration. Poultry Science 84(2):232-237 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.2.232
  20. Payne RL, Southern LL 2005a Comparison of inorganic and organic selenium sources for broilers. Poultry Science 84(6):898-902 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.6.898
  21. Rotruck JT, Pope AL, Ganther HE, Swanson AB, Hafeman DG, Hoekstra WG 1973 Selenium: biochemical role as a component of glutathione peroxidase. Science 179(73):588-590 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.179.4073.588
  22. SAS/STAT 1998 SAS user's guide. Release 6.12 edition, SAS Institute Inc, Cary NC
  23. Spears JW, Grimes J, Lloyd K, Ward TL 2003 Efficacy of a novel organic selenium compound (zinc-L-selenomethionine, availaSe) in broiler chicks. 1st Latin American Congress of Animal Nutrition, Cancun: 197-198
  24. Thompson JN, Scott ML 1970 Impaired lipid and vitamin E absorption related to atrophy of the pancreas in seleniumdeficient chicks. J Nutr 100:797-809 https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/100.7.797
  25. Upton Jr. JR 2003 The effects of selenium supplementation on performance and antioxidant enzyme activity in broiler chickens. A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University
  26. Utterback PL, Parsons CM, Yoon I, Butler J 2005 Effect of supplementing selenium yeast in diets of laying hens on egg selenium content. Poultry Science 84(12):1900-1901 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.12.1900
  27. 박경수 2000 유도결합 플라스마/질량분석법을 이용한 생체시료 중 저마늄, 비소, Se의 분석에 관한 연구. 경희대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
  28. 박경수 김선태 2001 ICP/MS를 이용한 계란 및 건조돼지고기 중 셀렌 분석을 위한 전처리 방법 연구. 분석과학. 14(6):465-470