The Impact of Window Information Effect on Consumers' Willingness to Visit a Fashion Store -Focusing on Group Differences by Clothing Shopping Orientation-

패션제품의 윈도우 정보효과가 점포 방문의사결정에 미치는 영향 -의복쇼핑성향에 따른 집단간 차이를 중심으로-

  • Jeon, Min-Ji (Dept. of Fashion Design, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Oh, Hee-Sun (Dept. of Design, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Suh, Yong-Han (Dept. of Distribution Management, Ulsan College)
  • 전민지 (부경대학교 패션디자인학과) ;
  • 오희선 (부경대학교 디자인학부) ;
  • 서용한 (울산과학대학 유통경영과)
  • Published : 2006.10.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of window information on consumers' willingness to visit a fashion store according to their clothing shopping orientation. The sutjects of the research are conveniently selected females over the age of 20 living in Busan. A total of 202 questionnaire are collected far data analysis. The results of this study are as follows: 1. The factor analysis to identify the clothing shopping orientation showed four factors, such as hedonic, planned, independent/loyalty, and impulsive/convenience. A cluster analysis conducted by the four factors resulted in four patterns - utilitarian shopping orientation group, impulsive/convenience shopping orientation group, hedonic shopping orientation group, independent/loyalty shopping orientation group. 2. The window information conducted by factor analysis were divided into the four levels-product information, promotion information, fashion information, and store image. 3. A one-way ANOVA analysis carried out to find the window information effects among the groups revealed that there were significant differences in the factors of promotion information, fashion information, and store image. 4. Multi-regression analysis was conducted in order to find the impact of window information on the consumers' willingness to visit a fashion store. As a result, fashion information had the most impact on utilitarian shopping group, while product information, promotion information and store image had a great impact on impulsive/convenience shopping orientation group, fashion information and store image had the most impact on hedonic shopping orientation group.

Keywords

References

  1. 김소영. (1994). 소비자의 의복쇼핑성향과 점포애고행동에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문
  2. 김지현. (1999).남성집단의 의복추구혜택에 따른 정보원과 쇼핑성향에 관한 연구. 신라대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문
  3. 강경자, 김은정. (1995). 의복구매시 소비자의 의사결정과정에서 디스플레이의 역할. 복식문화연구, 25, 171-181
  4. 권양숙. (2003). 쇼윈도우 디스플레이 경향에 관한 연구. 한국실내디자인학회논문집, 38, 233-240
  5. 박광희. (1997). 의복쇼핑성향에 따른 소비자의 유형분석-대구 여성 거주자를 중심으로-. 한국의류학회지, 21(1), 10-18
  6. 신수연, 김희수. (2002). 여성의류매장의 VMD(Visual Merchandising)에 관한 연구. 복식문화연구, 10(6), 617-632
  7. 서은희. (1995). 소비자의 의복쇼핑성향, 의복관여, 지속적 정보탐색 및 의복구매와의 관련을 중심으로. 충남대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문
  8. 이연순, 박성혜, 박윤아. (1993). 의류매장 종류에 따른 쇼윈도우 디스플레이에 관한 연구. 대한가정학회지, 31(2), 205-211
  9. 이철원, 정필원. (1993). 실전디스플레이 (개정판). 서울: 이즘
  10. 이홍림. (2002). 패션마케팅에서의 판매촉진을 위한 비주얼 머천다이징에 관한 연구. 디자인과학연구, 7(20), 75-88
  11. 추호정. (1998). 의류점포내 구매 환경 만족도가 고객의 점포에 대한 태도에 미치는 영향. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문
  12. 하종경. (1999). 소비자의 의복쇼핑성향에 따른 점포이미지에 관한 연구. 대한가정학회지, 8(2), 301-312
  13. Beatty, S. & Smith, S. M. (1987). External search effort: An investigation across several product categories. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 83-95 https://doi.org/10.1086/209095
  14. Castaneda, L. (1996). There's more in store. The Dallas Morning News, 16(January)
  15. Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., & Miniard, P. W. (1990). Consumer behavior (6th ed.). Chicago: The Dryden Press
  16. Fletcher, K. (1987). Consumers' use and perceptions of retailer controlled information sources. International Journal of Retailing, 2, 59-66
  17. Gutman, J. & Mills, M. K. (1982). Fashion life style, self-concept, shopping orientation, and store patronage: An integrative analysis. Journal of Retailing, 58(2), 64-86
  18. Heath, R. P. (1995). Psychographies: Q'est-ce que c'est? American Demographics, 74-79
  19. Hirschman, E. C., Greenberg, B., & Roberston, D. H. (1978). The intermarket reliability of retail image research. Journal of Retailing, 54(1), 3-12
  20. Howell, R. D. (1979). A multivariate examination of a patronage model: The impact of values and life styles on shopping orientations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arkansas
  21. James, D. L., Durand, R. L., & Dreves, R. A. (1976). The use of a multiattribute model in a store study. Journal of Retailing, 52, 23-32
  22. Klokis, H. (1986). Store window: Dynamic first impressions. Chain Store Age Executive, 62, 108-109
  23. Park, C. W., Jaworski, B. J., & Macinnis, D. J. (1986). Strategic brand concept-image managment. Journal of Marketing, 50(4), 135-145 https://doi.org/10.2307/1251291
  24. Payne, J. W., Bettrnan, J. R, & Johnson, E. J. (1992). Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 87-131 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.000511
  25. Richardson, P. S., Dick, A. S., & Jain, A. K. (1994). Extrinsic and intrinsic cue effects on perceptions of store brand quality. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 28-36 https://doi.org/10.2307/1251914
  26. Shim, S. & Kotsiopulos, A. (1992). Patronage behavior of apparel shopping: Part I. shopping orientation, store attributes, information sources, and personal characteristics. Clothing and Textile Research Journal, 10(2), 48-57 https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9201000208
  27. Sankar, S., Lauren, G. B., & Sucharita, C. (2002). Window displays and consumer shopping decisions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 9, 277-290 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-6989(01)00037-6
  28. Tatzel, M. (1982). Skill and motivation in clothes shopping: fashion conscious, independent, anxious, and apathetic customers. Journal of Retailing, 58, 90-97
  29. Walters, C. G. (1974). Consumer behavior: Theory and practices. Illinois: Richard D