양극산화처리를 통한 다공성 임플랜트 표면의 표면거칠기 증대에 대한 연구

STUDY ON THE ENHANCING MICRO-ROUGHNESS OF POROUS SURFACED DENIAL IMPLANT THROUGH ANODIZATION

  • 윤태호 (전북대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 송광엽 (전북대학교 치과대학 보철학교실)
  • Yoon, Tae-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Song, Kwang-Yeob (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
  • 발행 : 2006.10.31

초록

Statement of problem: HA has been used as a coating material on Ti implants to improve osteoconductivity. However. it is difficult to form uniform HA coatings on implants with complex surface geometries using a plasma spraying technique. Purpose : To determine if Ti6Al4V sintered porous-surfaced implants coated with HA sol-gel coated and hydrothermal treated would accelerate osseointegration. Materials and Methods : Porous implants which were made by electric discharge were used in this study. Implants were anodized and hydrothermal treatment or HA sol-gel coating was performed. Hydrothermal treatment was conducted by high pressure steam at $300^{\circ}C$ for 2 hours using a autoclave. To make a HA sol, triethyl phosphite and calcium nitrate were diluted and dissolved in anhydrous ethanol and mixed. Then anodized implant were spin-coated with the prepared HA sols and heat treated. Samples were soaked in the Hanks solution with pH 7.4 at $37^{\circ}C$ for 6 weeks. The microstructure of the specimens was observed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM), and the composition of the surface layer was analyzed with an energy dispersive spectroscope (EDS). Results : The scanning electron micrographs of HA sol-gel coated and hydrothermal treated surface did not show any significant change in the size or shape of the pores. After immersion in Hanks' solution the precipitated HA crystals covered macro- and micro-pores The precipitated Ca and P increased in Hanks' solution that surface treatment caused increased activity. Conclusion : This study shows that sol-gel coated HA and hydrothermal treatment significantly enhance the rate of HA formation due to the altered surface chemistry.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Long M, Rack HJ Titanium alloys in total joint replacement: A materials science perspective. Biomaterials 1998:19:1621-1639 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00146-4
  2. Wilke A, Landgraff M, Orth J, Kienpfel H, Grissand P, Franke R. Human bone marrow cell cultures: A sensitive method for determination of the biocompatibility of implant materials. ATLA 1999:27:137-151
  3. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark P-I. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981:10:387-416 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  4. Quirynen M, Bollen CM, Papaioannou W, Van Eldere J, van Steenberghe D. The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: Short-tern observations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996:11:169-178
  5. Hutton JE, Health MR, Chai JY, Harnett J, Jemt T, Johns RB. Factors related to success and failure rates at 4-year follow-up in a multicenter study of overdentures supported by Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995: 10:33-42
  6. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP. Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mat Res 1991:25:889-902 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820250708
  7. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B. Design and surface characteristics of 13 commercially available oral implant systems. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Implants 1993:8:622-633
  8. Cooper LF. A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 2000:84:522-534 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.111966
  9. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorelli JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991:28:889-902
  10. Piattelli M, Scarano A, Paolantonio M, Iezzi G, Petrone G, Piattelli A. Bone response to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants: An experimental study in rabbits. J Oral Implantol 2002:28:2-8 https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0002:BRTMAR>2.3.CO;2
  11. Sanz A, Oyarzun A, Farias D, Diaz I. Experimental study of bone response to a new surface treatment of endosseous titanium implants. Implant Dent 2001:10: 126-131 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200104000-00009
  12. Ishizawa H, Ogino M. Formation and characterization of anodic titanium oxide films containing Ca and P. J Biomed Mater Res 1995:29:65-72 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820290110
  13. Pilliar R. Porous surfaced metallic implants for orthopedic applications. J Biomed Mater Res 1987:21:1-33 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820210106
  14. Bobyn J, Pilliar R, Cameron H, Weatherly G. The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. Clin Ortho Relat Res 1980:150:263-270
  15. Deporter D, Watson P, Pilliar R, Melcher A, Winslow J, Howley T. et al. A histological assessment of the initial healing response adjacent to porous-surfaced titanium alloy dental implants in dogs. J Dent Res 1986:65:1064-1070 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345860650080501
  16. Deporter DA, Watson PA, Pilliar RM. A histological assessment of the initial healing response adjacent to porous surfaced Ti alloy dental implants in dogs. J Dent Res 1986:65:1064-1070 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345860650080501
  17. Pilliar RM, Deporter PA, Watson PA. The effect of partial coating with hydroxyapaite on bone remodeling in relation to porous-coated titanium-alloy dental implants in the dog. J Dent Res 1991:70:1338-1345 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345910700100501
  18. Albreksson T, Osseointegrated titanium implants. Acta Orthop Scand 1981:52: 155-170 https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776
  19. Simmons CA, Valiquette N, Pilliar RM. Osseointegration of sintered poroussurfaced and plasma spray-coated implants: an animal model study of early postimplantation healing response and mechanical stability. J Biomed Mater Res 1999:47:127-138 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199911)47:2<127::AID-JBM3>3.0.CO;2-C
  20. Simmons CA, Meguid SA, Pilliar RM. Differences in osseointegration rate due to implant surface geometry can be explained by local tissue strains. J Orthop Res 2001:19:187-194 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-0266(00)90006-8
  21. Ishizawa H, Ogino M. Formation and characterization of anodic titanium oxide films containing Ca and P. J Biomed Mater Res 1995:29:65-72 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820290110
  22. Sul YT. The significance of the surface properties of oxidized titanium to the bone response: special emphasis on potential biochemical bonding of oxidized titanium implants. Biomaterials 2003:24:3893-3907 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00261-8
  23. Son WW. Zhu X, Shin HI, Ong JL, Kim KH. In vivo histological response to anodized and anodized/hydrothermally treated titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res 2003:66B:520-525 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.10042
  24. Gan L, Wang J, Tache A, Valiquette N, Deporter D, Pilliar R. Calcium phosphate sol-gel-derived thin films on porous-surfaced implants for enhanced osteoconductivity. Part II: short term in vivo studies. Biomaterials 2004:25:5313-5321 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.12.039
  25. Nguyen HQ, Deporter DA, Pilliar RM. Valiquette N, Yakubovich R. The effect of sol-gel formed calcium phosphate coatings on bone ingrowth and osteoconductivity of porous surfaced Ti alloy implants. Biomaterials 2004:25:865-876 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00607-0
  26. Overgaard S, Soballe K, Hansen ES, Josephsen K, Bunger C. Implant loading accelerates resorption of hydroxyapatite coating. J Orthop Res 1996:14:888-894 https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100140607
  27. Jarcho M. Retrospective analysis of hydroxyapatite development for oral implant applications. Dent Clin North Am 1992:36:19-26
  28. Bloebaum RD, Dupont JA. Osteolysis from a press-fit hydroxyapatite-coated implant. A case study. J Arthroplasty 1993:8:195-202 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(09)80013-2
  29. Kim HW, Kim HE, Knowles JC. Fluorhydroxyapatite sol-gel coating on titanium substrate for hard tissue implants. Biomaterials 2004:25:3351-3358 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.104
  30. Li LH, Kim HW, Lee SH, Kong YM, Kim HE. Biocompatibility of titanium implants modified by microarc oxidation and hydroxyapatite coating. J Biomed Mater Res 2005:73A:48-54 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30244
  31. Knabe C, Howlett C, Klar F, Zreiqat H. The effect of different titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implant surfaces on phenotypic expression of human bone derived cells. J Biomed Mater Res 2004:71A:98-107 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30130
  32. Anselme K, Bigerelle M, Noel B, Dufresne E, Judas D, Iost A, et al. Qualitative and quantitative study of human osteoblast adhesion on materials with various surface roughness. J Biomed Mater Res 2000:49:155-166 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(200002)49:2<155::AID-JBM2>3.0.CO;2-J
  33. Wang J, Layrolle P, Stigter M, de Groot K. Biomimetic and electrolytic calcium phosphate coatings on titanium alloy: Physicochemical characteristics and cell attachment. Biomaterials 2004:25:583-592 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00559-3
  34. Xue W. Tao S. Liu X. Zheng X. Ding C. In vivo evaluation of plasma sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings having different crystallinity. Biomaterials 2004:25:415-421 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00545-3
  35. Kim HW, Kim HE, Salih V, Knowles JC. Sol-gel-modified titanium with hydroxyapatite thin films and effect on osteoblast-like cell responses. J Biomed Mater Res 2005:74A:294-305 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30191
  36. lshizawa H, Fujino M, Ogino M. Histomorphometric evaluation of the thin hydroxyapatite layer formed through anodization followed by hydrothermal treatment. J Biomed Mater Res 1997:35:199-206 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199705)35:2<199::AID-JBM8>3.0.CO;2-I