1 |
lshizawa H, Fujino M, Ogino M. Histomorphometric evaluation of the thin hydroxyapatite layer formed through anodization followed by hydrothermal treatment. J Biomed Mater Res 1997:35:199-206
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Quirynen M, Bollen CM, Papaioannou W, Van Eldere J, van Steenberghe D. The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: Short-tern observations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996:11:169-178
|
3 |
Piattelli M, Scarano A, Paolantonio M, Iezzi G, Petrone G, Piattelli A. Bone response to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants: An experimental study in rabbits. J Oral Implantol 2002:28:2-8
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Albreksson T, Osseointegrated titanium implants. Acta Orthop Scand 1981:52: 155-170
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Simmons CA, Valiquette N, Pilliar RM. Osseointegration of sintered poroussurfaced and plasma spray-coated implants: an animal model study of early postimplantation healing response and mechanical stability. J Biomed Mater Res 1999:47:127-138
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Overgaard S, Soballe K, Hansen ES, Josephsen K, Bunger C. Implant loading accelerates resorption of hydroxyapatite coating. J Orthop Res 1996:14:888-894
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Li LH, Kim HW, Lee SH, Kong YM, Kim HE. Biocompatibility of titanium implants modified by microarc oxidation and hydroxyapatite coating. J Biomed Mater Res 2005:73A:48-54
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Knabe C, Howlett C, Klar F, Zreiqat H. The effect of different titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implant surfaces on phenotypic expression of human bone derived cells. J Biomed Mater Res 2004:71A:98-107
DOI
|
9 |
Long M, Rack HJ Titanium alloys in total joint replacement: A materials science perspective. Biomaterials 1998:19:1621-1639
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Wilke A, Landgraff M, Orth J, Kienpfel H, Grissand P, Franke R. Human bone marrow cell cultures: A sensitive method for determination of the biocompatibility of implant materials. ATLA 1999:27:137-151
|
11 |
Hutton JE, Health MR, Chai JY, Harnett J, Jemt T, Johns RB. Factors related to success and failure rates at 4-year follow-up in a multicenter study of overdentures supported by Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995: 10:33-42
|
12 |
Bloebaum RD, Dupont JA. Osteolysis from a press-fit hydroxyapatite-coated implant. A case study. J Arthroplasty 1993:8:195-202
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Deporter DA, Watson PA, Pilliar RM. A histological assessment of the initial healing response adjacent to porous surfaced Ti alloy dental implants in dogs. J Dent Res 1986:65:1064-1070
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Cooper LF. A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 2000:84:522-534
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Bobyn J, Pilliar R, Cameron H, Weatherly G. The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. Clin Ortho Relat Res 1980:150:263-270
|
16 |
Son WW. Zhu X, Shin HI, Ong JL, Kim KH. In vivo histological response to anodized and anodized/hydrothermally treated titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res 2003:66B:520-525
DOI
|
17 |
Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark P-I. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981:10:387-416
DOI
|
18 |
Sanz A, Oyarzun A, Farias D, Diaz I. Experimental study of bone response to a new surface treatment of endosseous titanium implants. Implant Dent 2001:10: 126-131
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B. Design and surface characteristics of 13 commercially available oral implant systems. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Implants 1993:8:622-633
|
20 |
Gan L, Wang J, Tache A, Valiquette N, Deporter D, Pilliar R. Calcium phosphate sol-gel-derived thin films on porous-surfaced implants for enhanced osteoconductivity. Part II: short term in vivo studies. Biomaterials 2004:25:5313-5321
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Ishizawa H, Ogino M. Formation and characterization of anodic titanium oxide films containing Ca and P. J Biomed Mater Res 1995:29:65-72
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Xue W. Tao S. Liu X. Zheng X. Ding C. In vivo evaluation of plasma sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings having different crystallinity. Biomaterials 2004:25:415-421
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Deporter D, Watson P, Pilliar R, Melcher A, Winslow J, Howley T. et al. A histological assessment of the initial healing response adjacent to porous-surfaced titanium alloy dental implants in dogs. J Dent Res 1986:65:1064-1070
DOI
ScienceOn
|
24 |
Nguyen HQ, Deporter DA, Pilliar RM. Valiquette N, Yakubovich R. The effect of sol-gel formed calcium phosphate coatings on bone ingrowth and osteoconductivity of porous surfaced Ti alloy implants. Biomaterials 2004:25:865-876
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Wang J, Layrolle P, Stigter M, de Groot K. Biomimetic and electrolytic calcium phosphate coatings on titanium alloy: Physicochemical characteristics and cell attachment. Biomaterials 2004:25:583-592
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Pilliar RM, Deporter PA, Watson PA. The effect of partial coating with hydroxyapaite on bone remodeling in relation to porous-coated titanium-alloy dental implants in the dog. J Dent Res 1991:70:1338-1345
DOI
ScienceOn
|
27 |
Kim HW, Kim HE, Salih V, Knowles JC. Sol-gel-modified titanium with hydroxyapatite thin films and effect on osteoblast-like cell responses. J Biomed Mater Res 2005:74A:294-305
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Simmons CA, Meguid SA, Pilliar RM. Differences in osseointegration rate due to implant surface geometry can be explained by local tissue strains. J Orthop Res 2001:19:187-194
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP. Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mat Res 1991:25:889-902
DOI
|
30 |
Sul YT. The significance of the surface properties of oxidized titanium to the bone response: special emphasis on potential biochemical bonding of oxidized titanium implants. Biomaterials 2003:24:3893-3907
DOI
ScienceOn
|
31 |
Kim HW, Kim HE, Knowles JC. Fluorhydroxyapatite sol-gel coating on titanium substrate for hard tissue implants. Biomaterials 2004:25:3351-3358
DOI
ScienceOn
|
32 |
Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorelli JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991:28:889-902
|
33 |
Pilliar R. Porous surfaced metallic implants for orthopedic applications. J Biomed Mater Res 1987:21:1-33
DOI
ScienceOn
|
34 |
Jarcho M. Retrospective analysis of hydroxyapatite development for oral implant applications. Dent Clin North Am 1992:36:19-26
|
35 |
Anselme K, Bigerelle M, Noel B, Dufresne E, Judas D, Iost A, et al. Qualitative and quantitative study of human osteoblast adhesion on materials with various surface roughness. J Biomed Mater Res 2000:49:155-166
DOI
ScienceOn
|
36 |
Ishizawa H, Ogino M. Formation and characterization of anodic titanium oxide films containing Ca and P. J Biomed Mater Res 1995:29:65-72
DOI
ScienceOn
|