대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제44권5호
  • /
  • Pages.606-616
  • /
  • 2006
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지

처리 방법이 다른 표면이 임플랜트의 골유착 및 안정성에 미치는 영향

THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENT ON THE OSSEOINTEGRATION AND STABILITY OF IMPLANTS

  • 양성욱 (단국대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 임헌송 (단국대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 조인호 (단국대학교 치과대학 보철학교실)
  • Yang, Seoung-Wook (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Lim, Heon-Song (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Cho, In-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 발행 : 2006.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: This experiment examined the effect of different surface treatment on the osseointegration and stability of implants. Material and methods: In this study, 40 each of machined, SLA and RBM implants, which are the most commonly used implants, were implanted into the tibia of 20 normal rabbits using $OsseoCare^{TM}$. The rabbits were sacrificed after 1 week, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks for implant stability analysis, removal torque analysis, histologic and histomorphometric analysis. Result : ISQ showed significant difference between Machined and RBM at first week and at 4 weeks. There was significant difference between Machined and both SLA and RBM(p<0.05) but after 8 weeks there were no significant difference between each group. In the removal torque, RBM showd significantly higher values than SLA and Machined surface at 1st week. At 4th and 12th week, there was significant difference between Machined and SLA, RBM(p<0.05). In the bone to implant contact variable, there was no significant difference between each surface treatment method. In the Machined surface group, there was no significant difference between each time interval. but in SLA group, there were significant differences between the 1st week and 12th week and in RBM group, there were significant differences between the 1st week and 8th, 12th week and between 4th and 12th week(p<0.05). The bone area showed significantly higher values in SLA and RBM compared to Machined surface 1st and 8th week and significantly higher values in SLA than Machined surface at the 4th week(p<0.05). Conclusion: The roughened surface of implants showed positive effect in the early stages of implantation and assisted in bone formation After the bone formation stage, there was no statistical difference between Machined and roughened surface groups. In dental implantation, where initial stability is critical to the success of implants, the use of roughened surface implants should assist in reducing the healing period after implantation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Albrektsson T. Direct bone anchorage of dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1983:50:255-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90027-6
  2. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Acta Orthop Scand 1981:52:155 https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776
  3. Albrektsson T, Jacobsson M. Bone-metal interface in osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent 1987:57:597-607 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90344-1
  4. Carsson L, Rostlund T, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson T. Removal torque for polished and rough titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988:3:21-4
  5. Cook SD, Baffes GC, Palafox AJ, Wolfe MW, Burgess A. Torsional stability of HA-coated and grit-blasted titanium dental implants. J Oral Implantol 1992;18:354-358
  6. Godfredsen K, Nimb L, Hjorting-Hansen E, Jensen JS, Holm'en A. Histomorphometric and removal torque analysis for $TiO_2$-blasted titanium implants. An experimental study on dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992:3: 77-84 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030205.x
  7. Cook SD, Kay JF, Thomas KA, Jarcho M. Interface mechanics and histology of titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium for dental implant applications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987:2:15-22
  8. Gottlander M, Albrektsson T. Histomorphometric analyses of hydroxyapatite-coated and uncoated titanium implants. The importance of the implants design. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992:3:71-6
  9. Baker D, London RM, O'Neal R. Rate of pullout strength gain of dual-etched titanium implants: A comparative study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999:14:722-8
  10. De Leonardis D, Garg AK, Pecora GE, Andreana S. Osseointegration of rough acidetched titanium implants: One-year followup of placement of 100 minimatic implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997:12:65-73
  11. Klokkevold P, Nishmura RD, Adachi M, Caputo A. Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titatium surface. A torque removal study in rabbit. Clin Oral Implant Res 1997:8:442-7 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080601.x
  12. Anderson JM, Miller KM. Biomaterials biocompatibility and the macrophage. Biomaterial 1984:5:5-10 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(84)90060-7
  13. Kennt JJN, Quinn JM. Aveolar ridge augmentation using non resorbable HA with or without autogenous cancellous bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1983:41:629-42 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(83)90016-2
  14. Kirsch A. Plasma-sprayed titanium-I.M.Z. implant. J Oral Implantol 1986:12(3) :49-47
  15. Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 1998:40:1-11 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199804)40:1<1::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-Q
  16. Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxland T, Cochran DL, Schenk RK. Hirt HP, Snetivy D. Nolte LP. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomd Mater Res 1992:45:75-83
  17. Feighan JE, Goldberg VM, Davy D, Parr JA Stevenson S. The influence of surfaceblasting on the incorporation of titaniumalloy implants in a rabbit intramedullary model. J Bone Joint Surg 1995:77-A:1380-9 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199509000-00015
  18. Wennerberg A Albrektsson T, Lausmaa J. Torque and histomorphometric evaluation of C.P. titanium screws blasted with 25- and $75-{\mu}m$-sized particles of $Al_2O_3$. J Biomed Mater Res 1996:30:251-60 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199602)30:2<251::AID-JBM16>3.0.CO;2-P
  19. Wennerberg A Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B. Experimental study of turned and grit-blasted screw-shaped implants with special emphasis on effect of blasting material and surface topography. Biomaterials 1996:17:15-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(96)80750-2
  20. Piattelli M, Scarano A, Paolantonio M, Iezz G, Petrone G, Piattelli A. Bone response to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants: An experimental study in rabbits. J Orallmplantol 2002:28:2-8
  21. Park C, Lim JH, Cho IH, Lim HS. The study of implant stability test by resonance frequency analysis method. J Korean Academy of Prothodontics 2003:41: 182-206
  22. Meredith N, Book K, Friberg B, Jemt T, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in vivo. Clin Oral Implant Res 1997:8(3):234-43 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080310.x
  23. Babbush CA, Shimura M. Five-year statistical and clinical observations with the IMZ two-stage osseointegrated implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993:8:245-53
  24. Bragger U, Hafeli U, Huber B, Hammerle CH, Lang NP. Evaluation of postsurgical crestal bone levels adjacent to non-submerged dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998:9:218-24 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090402.x
  25. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991:62:2-4 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.1.2
  26. Adell R, Lekholm U, Branemark PI. Surgical procedure In: Branemark PI. Zarb G, Albrektsson T: Tissue-integrated prostheses: Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago Quintessence 1985:221-9
  27. Carlsson L, Rostlund T, Albrektsson T and Branemark PI. Osseintegration of titanium implants. Acta Orthop Scand 1986:57:285-9 https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678608994393
  28. Maniatopoulos C, Pilliar RM, Smith DC. Threaded versus porous-sufaced design for implant stabilization in bone-endodontic implant model. J Biomed Mater Res 1986:20:1309-33 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820200907
  29. Baier RE, Meyer AE, Natiella JR, Natiella RR, Carter JM. Surface properties determine bioadhesive outcomes: methods and results. J Biomed Mater Res 1984:18:337-55 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820180404
  30. Kasemo B, Lausman J, Surface science aspects on inorganic biomaterials. CRC Crit Rev Biocompat 1986:2:335-80
  31. Chehroudi B, Gould TRL, Brunette DM. A light and electron microscopy study of the effect of surface topography on the behavior of cells attached to titanium-coated percutaneous implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1991:25:387-405 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820250310
  32. Buser B, Schenk RK, Steinmann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants: A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991:25:889-902 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820250708
  33. Carlsson L, Rostlund T, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson T. Removal torque for polished and rough titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988:3:21-4
  34. Ericsson I, Johansson CB, Bystedt H, Norton MR. A histomorphometric evaluation of bone-to-implant contact on machine-prepared and roughened titanium dental implants. A pilot study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994:5:202-6 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050402.x
  35. Ratner BD. Biomaterial surface. Applied biomaterial. J Biomed Mater Res 1987:21:59-90 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820210110
  36. Goldberg VM, Stevenson S, Feighan J, Davy D. Biology of grit blasted titanium alloy implants. Clinical Orthop ReI Res 1995:319:122-9
  37. Cochran DL, Buser D, Bruggenkate CM, Weingart D, Tayler TM, Bernard JP, Peters F, Simpson J. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with sandblasted and acidetched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002:13:144-53 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130204.x
  38. Gonshor A, Goveia G, Sotirakis E. A prospective, multicenter, 4-year study of the ACE Surgical resorbable blast media implant. J Oral Implantol 2003:29:174-80 https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2003)029<0174:APMSOT>2.3.CO;2
  39. Roccuzzo M, Bunino M, Prioglio F, Bianchi SD. Early loading of sandblasted and acidetched (SLA) implants: a prospective splitmouth comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001:12:572-8 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120604.x
  40. Edgerton M, Levin MJ. Biocompatibility : It's future in prosthodontic research. J Prosthet Dent 1993:69:406-15 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90190-Y
  41. Weiss MB and Rostoker W. Development of a new endosseous dental implant. Part I : Animal studies. J Prosthet Dent 1981: 46:646-51 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(81)90073-1
  42. Gotfredsen K, Karlsson U. A prospective 5-year study of fixed partial prostheses supported by implants with machined and $TiO_2$-blasted surface. J Prosthodont 2001:10:2-7 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2001.00002.x
  43. Brunski JB. Biomechanics of oral implants: future research directions. J Dent Educ 1988:52:775-87
  44. Ueda M, Matsuki M, Jacobsson M, Tjellstrom A. The relationship between insertion torque and removal torque analyzed in fresh temporal bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991:6:442-7
  45. Luhr HG. Comparison osteosynthesis in treatment of mandibular fractures-experimental principles and clinical experiences. Dtsch Zahndrtzl Z. 1972:27(1):29-37
  46. Johansson CB, Albrektsson T. A removal torque and histomorphometric study of commercial pure nobium and titanium implants in rabbit bone. Clin Oral Impl Res 1991:2:24-9 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020103.x
  47. Lim JH, Cho IH. The bone quality test of both jaw with periotest. J Korean dentist association 1994:32:520-9
  48. Oka H, Yamamoto T, Saratoni K, Kawazoe T. Automatic diagnosis system of tooth mobility for clinical use. Medical Progress through Technology 1990: 16: 117-24
  49. Meredith N, Rasmussen L, Sennerby L, Alleyne D. Mapping implant stability by resonance frequency analysis. Med Sci Res 1996:24:191-9
  50. Johanson CB, Albreksson T. Integration of screw implant in the rabbits : A 1-yr followup of removal torque of titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987:2:69-75
  51. Sennerby L, Thomsen P, Ericsson LE. A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992:7:62-7
  52. Carlsson L. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Gothenburg, Sweden. 1989