Enzyme-Resistant Starch Content, Physical and Sensory Properties of Tarakjuk (Milk-Rice Porridge) with Different Amylose Content

아밀로즈 함량별 타락죽의 효소저항전분 함량, 물리적 및 관능적 특성

  • Lee, Gui-Chu (Department of Home Economics Education, College of Education, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Jung-Eun (Department of Home Economics Education, College of Education, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Yoon-Sun (Department of Home Economics Education, College of Education, Korea University)
  • 이귀주 (고려대학교 사범대학 가정교육과) ;
  • 김정은 (고려대학교 사범대학 가정교육과) ;
  • 김윤선 (고려대학교 사범대학 가정교육과)
  • Published : 2006.04.30


Tarakjuk with different amylose content was made up using roasted rice flours that consisted of the highest enzyme-resistant starch (RS), while differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was also utilized to measure the gelatinization temperature of these roasted rice flours in order to establish cooking temperature of tarakjuk. The following qualities of tarakjuk with different amylose content were studied: color, viscosity, spreadability, starch fractions involving total starch (TS), rapidly digestible starch (RDS), slowly digestible starch (SDS) and RS, in vitro starch digestibility (IVSD) and sensory properties. During experimentation, it was found that as the amylose content of the rice flour decreased, the L value of tarakjuk decreased, whereas a value increased significantly (p<0.05). Also, while viscosity showed to increase significantly (p<0.05), on the opposite end, the property of spreadability decreased. TS ranged from $15.95{\sim}17.31%$, RDS $9.36{\sim}10.16%$, SDS $5.46{\sim}6.91%$ and RS $0.33{\sim}1.07%$, on a dry basis. Although the amylose content of rice flours decreased, IVSD increased, however showing no significant difference. When testing the sensory properties of tarakjuk, color and viscosity increased, whereas clumpiness decreased. Ilpum tarakjuk showed the highest score for nutty taste and overall acceptance levels. In fact a high correlation was shown between nutty taste and overall acceptance level (p<0.01), which leads one to believe that nutty taste is a prime factor that greatly influences overall acceptance. Furthermore, viscosity was positively correlated with both a and b values, however negatively correlated with L value (p<0.05). Moreover, roasted nutty taste and overall acceptance were positively correlated with a value (p<0.05), respectively. In conclusion, the above results suggest that tarakjuk could be made by choosing the appropriate rice flour based on the nutritional or sensory purpose.



  1. 허명회. 2002. SPSS를 활용한 통계적 방법론. SPSS 아카데미
  2. A.O.A.C. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis, 5th edition. Association of officially analytical chemists. Washington DC
  3. Aarathi A, Urooj A, Puttaraj SH. 2003. In vitro starch digestibility and nutritionally important starch fractions in cereals and their mixtures. Starch, 55: 9-4-99
  4. Ahmed M, Belfast JL. 1978. Effect of various drying procedure on the crystallinity of starch isolated from wheat grains. Starch, 30: S78-79 https://doi.org/10.1002/star.19780300303
  5. Akerberg A, Liljeberg H, Bjorck I. 1998. Effect of amylose/amylopectin ratio and baking conditions on resistant starch formation and glycemic indices. J of Cereal Sci., 28: 71-80 https://doi.org/10.1006/jcrs.1997.0173
  6. Asp NG. 1995. Classification and methology of food carbohydrates as related to nutritional effects. Am J Clin Nutr. Suppl., 61: 930S-937S
  7. Devi K, Geervani P. 2000. Rice processing-effect on dietary fiber components and in vitro starch digestibility. J Food Sci Technol., 37(3): 315-318
  8. Eliasson AC. 1996. Carbohydrate in foods. University of Lund, Sweden, Marcel Dekker, Inc. p 534
  9. Englyst HN, Kingman SM, Cummings JH. 1992. Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions. Eur J of Clin Nutr., 46(2): 33-50
  10. Flipse E, Keetels CJAM, Jacobson E, Visser RGF. 1996. Absence of amylose has a distinct influence on the physico-chemical properties of starch. Theo Appl Genetics, 92: 121-127 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00222961
  11. Goni I, Garcia Diz L, Manas E, Saura Calixto F. 1996. Analysis of resistant starch: A method for foods and food products. Food Chem., 56: 445-449 https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(95)00222-7
  12. Han SH, Oh MS. 2001. A comparative study on quality characteristics of Jook (traditional Korean rice gruel) made of imported and domestic rices (Chuchung byeo). Korean J Soc Food Cookery Sci., 17(6): 604-610
  13. Holm J, Asp NG, Bjorck I. 1987. Factors affecting enzymatic degradation of cereal starches in vitro and in vivo. In: Cereal in a european context. First european conference on food science and technology. Morton ID (ed). Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK. pp 169-187
  14. Hylla S, Gostner A, Dusel G, Anger H, Bartram HP, Christ! SU, Kasper H, Scheppach W. 1998. Effects of resistant starch on the colon in healthy volunteers: possible implications for cancer prevention. Am J Clin Nutr., 67:136-142 https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/67.1.136
  15. Juliano BO. 1971. A simplified assay for milled-rice amylose. Cereal Sci Today, 16(10): 334-338
  16. Kim JO, Shin MS. 2003. Effect of RS3 type resistant starch prepared from nonwaxy rice starch on the properties of Injulmi. Korean J Soc Food Cookery Sci., 19(1): 65-71
  17. Krueger BR, Knutson CA, Inglett GE, Walker CE. 1987. A differential scanning calorimetry study on the effect of annealing on gelatinization behavior of corn starch. J Food Sci., 52: 715-718 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1987.tb06709.x
  18. Kum JS, Lee CH, Baek KH, Lee SH, Lee HY. 1995. Influence of cultivar on rice starch and cooking properties. Korean J Food Sci Technol., 27(3): 365-369
  19. Lee GC, Kim SJ, Koh BK. 2003. Effect of roasting condition on the physicochemical properties of rice flour and the quality characteristics of tarakjuk. Korean J Food Sci Technol., 35: 905-913
  20. Lee GC, Lim ST, Yoon HS. 2004. Effect of the cooking condition on enzyme-resistant starch content and in vitro.starch and protein digestibility of tarakjuk (milk-rice porridge). Korean J Food Sci Technol., 36: 765-772
  21. Lee SH, Han O, Lee HY, Kim SS, Chung DH. 1989. Physicochemical properties of rice starch by amylose content. Korean J Food Sci Technol., 21(6): 766-771
  22. Mangala SL, Udayasankar K, Tharanathan RN. 1999. Resistant starch from processed cereals: the influence of amylopectin and non-carbohydrate constituents in its formation. Food Chem., 64: 391-396 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00142-3
  23. Parchure AA, Kulkarni PR. 1997. Effect of food processing treatments on generation of resistant starch. International J of Food Sci and Nutr., 48: 257-260 https://doi.org/10.3109/09637489709028570
  24. Sagum R, Arcot J. 2000. Effect of domestic processing method on the starch, non-starch polysaccharides and in vitro starch and protein digestibility of three varieties of rice with varying levels of amylose. Food Chem., 70:107-111 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(00)00041-8
  25. Sievert D, Pomeranz Y. 1989. Enzyme-resistant starch 1. Characterization and evaluation by enzymatic, thermoanalytical, and microscopic methods. Cereal Chem., 66: 342-347
  26. Singh U, Kherdekar MS, Jambunathan R. 1982. Studies on desi and kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) culitivars. The levels of amylase inhibitors, levels of oligosaccharides and in vitro starch digestibility. J of Food Sci., 47: 510-512 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1982.tb10113.x
  27. Skrabanja V, Liljebrerg HGM, Hedley CL, Freft I, Bjorck IME. 1999. Influence of genotype and processing on the in vitro rate of starch hydrolysis and resistant starch formation in peas (Pisum sativum I.) J Agric Food Chem., 47: 2033-2039 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf981060f
  28. Tas AA, El SN. 2000. Determination of nutritionally important starch fractions of some Turkish breads. Food Chem., 70: 493-497 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(99)00272-1
  29. Wolf BW, Bauer LL, Fahey GC, JR. 1999. Effects of chemical modification: An attempt to discover a slowly digested starch. J Agric Food Chem., 47: 4178-4183 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf9813900