Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7318/KJFC.2006.21.2.171

Enzyme-Resistant Starch Content, Physical and Sensory Properties of Tarakjuk (Milk-Rice Porridge) with Different Amylose Content  

Lee, Gui-Chu (Department of Home Economics Education, College of Education, Korea University)
Kim, Jung-Eun (Department of Home Economics Education, College of Education, Korea University)
Kim, Yoon-Sun (Department of Home Economics Education, College of Education, Korea University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Food Culture / v.21, no.2, 2006 , pp. 171-178 More about this Journal
Abstract
Tarakjuk with different amylose content was made up using roasted rice flours that consisted of the highest enzyme-resistant starch (RS), while differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was also utilized to measure the gelatinization temperature of these roasted rice flours in order to establish cooking temperature of tarakjuk. The following qualities of tarakjuk with different amylose content were studied: color, viscosity, spreadability, starch fractions involving total starch (TS), rapidly digestible starch (RDS), slowly digestible starch (SDS) and RS, in vitro starch digestibility (IVSD) and sensory properties. During experimentation, it was found that as the amylose content of the rice flour decreased, the L value of tarakjuk decreased, whereas a value increased significantly (p<0.05). Also, while viscosity showed to increase significantly (p<0.05), on the opposite end, the property of spreadability decreased. TS ranged from $15.95{\sim}17.31%$, RDS $9.36{\sim}10.16%$, SDS $5.46{\sim}6.91%$ and RS $0.33{\sim}1.07%$, on a dry basis. Although the amylose content of rice flours decreased, IVSD increased, however showing no significant difference. When testing the sensory properties of tarakjuk, color and viscosity increased, whereas clumpiness decreased. Ilpum tarakjuk showed the highest score for nutty taste and overall acceptance levels. In fact a high correlation was shown between nutty taste and overall acceptance level (p<0.01), which leads one to believe that nutty taste is a prime factor that greatly influences overall acceptance. Furthermore, viscosity was positively correlated with both a and b values, however negatively correlated with L value (p<0.05). Moreover, roasted nutty taste and overall acceptance were positively correlated with a value (p<0.05), respectively. In conclusion, the above results suggest that tarakjuk could be made by choosing the appropriate rice flour based on the nutritional or sensory purpose.
Keywords
tarakjuk; amylose content; starch fractions; enzyme-resistant starch; physical and sensory properties;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 허명회. 2002. SPSS를 활용한 통계적 방법론. SPSS 아카데미
2 Eliasson AC. 1996. Carbohydrate in foods. University of Lund, Sweden, Marcel Dekker, Inc. p 534
3 Englyst HN, Kingman SM, Cummings JH. 1992. Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions. Eur J of Clin Nutr., 46(2): 33-50
4 Goni I, Garcia Diz L, Manas E, Saura Calixto F. 1996. Analysis of resistant starch: A method for foods and food products. Food Chem., 56: 445-449   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Han SH, Oh MS. 2001. A comparative study on quality characteristics of Jook (traditional Korean rice gruel) made of imported and domestic rices (Chuchung byeo). Korean J Soc Food Cookery Sci., 17(6): 604-610   과학기술학회마을
6 Kim JO, Shin MS. 2003. Effect of RS3 type resistant starch prepared from nonwaxy rice starch on the properties of Injulmi. Korean J Soc Food Cookery Sci., 19(1): 65-71
7 Lee SH, Han O, Lee HY, Kim SS, Chung DH. 1989. Physicochemical properties of rice starch by amylose content. Korean J Food Sci Technol., 21(6): 766-771   과학기술학회마을
8 Mangala SL, Udayasankar K, Tharanathan RN. 1999. Resistant starch from processed cereals: the influence of amylopectin and non-carbohydrate constituents in its formation. Food Chem., 64: 391-396   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Sievert D, Pomeranz Y. 1989. Enzyme-resistant starch 1. Characterization and evaluation by enzymatic, thermoanalytical, and microscopic methods. Cereal Chem., 66: 342-347
10 Tas AA, El SN. 2000. Determination of nutritionally important starch fractions of some Turkish breads. Food Chem., 70: 493-497   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Lee GC, Lim ST, Yoon HS. 2004. Effect of the cooking condition on enzyme-resistant starch content and in vitro.starch and protein digestibility of tarakjuk (milk-rice porridge). Korean J Food Sci Technol., 36: 765-772   과학기술학회마을
12 Parchure AA, Kulkarni PR. 1997. Effect of food processing treatments on generation of resistant starch. International J of Food Sci and Nutr., 48: 257-260   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Sagum R, Arcot J. 2000. Effect of domestic processing method on the starch, non-starch polysaccharides and in vitro starch and protein digestibility of three varieties of rice with varying levels of amylose. Food Chem., 70:107-111   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Aarathi A, Urooj A, Puttaraj SH. 2003. In vitro starch digestibility and nutritionally important starch fractions in cereals and their mixtures. Starch, 55: 9-4-99
15 Hylla S, Gostner A, Dusel G, Anger H, Bartram HP, Christ! SU, Kasper H, Scheppach W. 1998. Effects of resistant starch on the colon in healthy volunteers: possible implications for cancer prevention. Am J Clin Nutr., 67:136-142   DOI
16 Singh U, Kherdekar MS, Jambunathan R. 1982. Studies on desi and kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) culitivars. The levels of amylase inhibitors, levels of oligosaccharides and in vitro starch digestibility. J of Food Sci., 47: 510-512   DOI
17 Skrabanja V, Liljebrerg HGM, Hedley CL, Freft I, Bjorck IME. 1999. Influence of genotype and processing on the in vitro rate of starch hydrolysis and resistant starch formation in peas (Pisum sativum I.) J Agric Food Chem., 47: 2033-2039   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Wolf BW, Bauer LL, Fahey GC, JR. 1999. Effects of chemical modification: An attempt to discover a slowly digested starch. J Agric Food Chem., 47: 4178-4183   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Juliano BO. 1971. A simplified assay for milled-rice amylose. Cereal Sci Today, 16(10): 334-338
20 Akerberg A, Liljeberg H, Bjorck I. 1998. Effect of amylose/amylopectin ratio and baking conditions on resistant starch formation and glycemic indices. J of Cereal Sci., 28: 71-80   DOI   ScienceOn
21 A.O.A.C. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis, 5th edition. Association of officially analytical chemists. Washington DC
22 Krueger BR, Knutson CA, Inglett GE, Walker CE. 1987. A differential scanning calorimetry study on the effect of annealing on gelatinization behavior of corn starch. J Food Sci., 52: 715-718   DOI
23 Holm J, Asp NG, Bjorck I. 1987. Factors affecting enzymatic degradation of cereal starches in vitro and in vivo. In: Cereal in a european context. First european conference on food science and technology. Morton ID (ed). Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK. pp 169-187
24 Lee GC, Kim SJ, Koh BK. 2003. Effect of roasting condition on the physicochemical properties of rice flour and the quality characteristics of tarakjuk. Korean J Food Sci Technol., 35: 905-913
25 Kum JS, Lee CH, Baek KH, Lee SH, Lee HY. 1995. Influence of cultivar on rice starch and cooking properties. Korean J Food Sci Technol., 27(3): 365-369   과학기술학회마을
26 Ahmed M, Belfast JL. 1978. Effect of various drying procedure on the crystallinity of starch isolated from wheat grains. Starch, 30: S78-79   DOI
27 Asp NG. 1995. Classification and methology of food carbohydrates as related to nutritional effects. Am J Clin Nutr. Suppl., 61: 930S-937S
28 Flipse E, Keetels CJAM, Jacobson E, Visser RGF. 1996. Absence of amylose has a distinct influence on the physico-chemical properties of starch. Theo Appl Genetics, 92: 121-127   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Devi K, Geervani P. 2000. Rice processing-effect on dietary fiber components and in vitro starch digestibility. J Food Sci Technol., 37(3): 315-318