Korean Journal of Applied Biomechanics (한국운동역학회지)

Korean Society of Applied Biomechanics (한국운동역학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Weight Transfer Patterns Under the Different Golf Swing Types: a Case Study Involving a Low Handicap Player and a High Handicap Player (I)

골프스윙 방법에 따른 체중이동 패턴에 관한 연구:숙련자와 비숙련자의 케이스 스터디(I)

  • 박진 (서울여자대학교)
  • Published : 2005.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the weight transfer patterns under the different golf swing types which are full swing control swing and putting stroke. Two women golfers participated in this study, one(165cm, 94.3kg)being classified as a low-handicap(LH)player, the other(165cm, 54.5kg) being classified as a high-handicap(HH) player. Both players are right-handed. Two force plates(Kistler, 9286AA) were synchronized with a motion capture system(Qualisys ProReflex MCU240). Anteriorposterior, mediolateral, and vertical forces were used as an indicator of the pattern of swing. Four discrete positions which are address, top of backswing impact, and finish were identified as an event and three phases which are backswing downswing, and follow-through between he events were also identified. The results showed that, at impact, the total force was 1.24BW ring the full swing 1.17BW during the control stroke, 1.00BW during the putting stroke. Depending on the golf swing types, the differences are existed. At impact, the distribution of forces is different with a low-handicap(LH) player and a high-handicap(HH) player. A LH player has 26% in right foot and 74% in left foot during the full swing 49% in right foot and 51% in left foot during the control swing 49% in right foot and 51% in left foot during the putting stroke. A HH, on the other hand, has 74% in right foot and 26% in left foot during the full swing 62% in right foot and 38% in left foot during the control swing 54% in right foot and 46% in left foot during the putting stroke. From address to top of backswing the amount of vertical forces are changed 43:57(right foot: left foot) to 76:24 during the full swing 47:53(right foot: left foot) to 75:25 during the control swing 50:50(right foot: left foot) to 54:46 during the putting stroke. The biggest weight transfer pattern took place in full swing and the control swing is next, and the putting stroke is the final.

Keywords

References

  1. 김하영, 박진(1994). 골프스윙의 운동학적 분석. 한국체육학회지, 제33권, 제3호, 391-399.
  2. 이종훈(1998). 프로 골프 선수의 스윙 동작에 대한 지면 반력 분석. 한국체육학회지, 제37권, 제3호, 357-366.
  3. 이중숙, 이동기(2005). 프로와 아마추어 골퍼의 골프스윙 동작시 족저압력 비교 분석. 한국운동역학회지, 제15권 제2호, 41-55. https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2005.15.2.041
  4. 허유진, 문건필, 임정(2005). 클럽별 골프 스윙 시 지면 반력 변화에 관한 연구. 한국운동역학회지, 제15권, 제2호, 103-111. https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2005.15.2.103
  5. Carlsoo, S.(1967). A kinetic analysis of the golf swing. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 7, 76-82.
  6. Cooper,J.M., Bates, B.T., Bedi, J., & Scheuchenzuber, J.(1973). Kinematic and kinetic analysis of the golf swing. In R. C. Nelson & C.A. Morehouse(Eds.), Biomechanics IV, 328-333.
  7. Johnson, H.(1992). How to feel a tour pro's foot pressure. Golf Digest, Feb. 62-65.
  8. Spence, J.D., Caldwell, M.A., & Hudson, J.L.(2005).
  9. www.csuchico.edu/~jackieh/pdf/spence96.pdf
  10. Wallace, E.S., Graham, D. & Bleakley, E.W.(1990). Science and Golf. Proceedings of the first world scientific congress of golf, E. & F.N. Spon, London.
  11. Williams, K.R. & Cavanagh, P.R.(1983). The mechanics of foot action during the golf swing and implications for shoe design. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 15(3), 247-255.

Cited by

  1. Gender Differences in Electromyography of the Lower Extremity during Golf Driver Swing vol.19, pp.3, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2009.19.3.557
  2. A Comparative Analysis of X-factor Stretch between Driver and Iron Swing in Male Professional Golfers vol.20, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2010.20.4.487
  3. A Study of the Shot Differences Among Each Clubs and the Weight Shift Patterns from Back Swing Top to the Impact during the Golf Swing vol.19, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2009.19.2.287