DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Kinetic Analysis of the Lower Extremity Joints when Performing Uchi-mata by Uke's Posture in Judo

유도 허벅다리걸기 기술 발휘 시 받기 자세에 따른 하지관절의 kinetic 분석

  • Published : 2005.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the kinetical variables of the lower extremity joints when performing uchimata(inner thigh reaping throw) by uke(receiver)'s two posture(shizenhon tai), jigohon tai), by voluntary resistance level(VRL) in judo. The subjects, who were for 3 male Korean national representative judokas(elite group : EG) and 3 male representative judokas of Korean University(non-elite group: NEG), and were filmed 4 DV video cameras(60fields/sec.), that posture of uke were shizenhon-tai (straight natural posture), jigohon-tai(straight defensive posture), VRL of uke was 0%. The selected trials were subject to 3-dimensional film motion analysis and ground reaction force(MRF) analysis. The kinetical variable of this study were temporal, postures( ankle and knee angle of attacking leg), that were computed through video film analysis, MRF at events were obtained from the ground-reaction force analysis by AMTI force plate system. When performing uchi-mata according to each posture and by VRL, from the data analysis and discussion, the conclusions were as follows : 1) Temporal variables : total time-required(TR) when performing uchi-mata was shown EG 0.13sec the shorter than NEG(o.77sec.) in shizenhon-tai. and EG 0.17sec the shorter than NEG(o.76sec.) in jigonhon-tai. Also, all of two groups' jigohon-tai(0.68sec.) were faster than shizenhon-tai(0.71 sec.). 2) The posture variables : The angle of ankle in attacking when performing were plantar flexion in EG, and dorsi flexion in NEG by shizenhon-tai and jigohon-tai posture. The angle of knee in attacking when performing were extension in EG and NEG, but range of extension in EG were larger than in NEG. 3) MRF : Vertical MRF when performing uchi-mata was shown the strongest in the 2nd stage of kake phase(2.23BW) by EG in both posture, and it was same value by NEG(2.23BW), but shizenhon-tai (2.28BW), jigohon-tai(1.64BW), respectively.

Keywords

References

  1. 권문석(2002). 유도 맞잡기 타입에 따른 허벅다리걸기의 운동학적 분석. 미간행 석사학위논문, 용인대학교 일반대학원.
  2. 강충식(1989). 유도 발기술의 훈련이 생체역학적 변화에 미치는 영향. 미간행 박사학위논문 한양대학교 대학원.
  3. 김상철, 김의환(1991). 유도 한팔업어치기의 KINEMATIC분석, 무도연구소지 제3집, 경기 : 대한체육과학대학 무도연구소.
  4. 김의환(1984). 유도 발기술의 생체역학적 분석. 서울: 대한체육회 스포츠과학연구소.
  5. 김의환(1988). 유도 메치기 기술의 생체역학적 분석 및 현장적용. 스포츠과학연구소.
  6. 김의환(1992). 유도 메치기 기술의 생체역학적 분석을 통한 유도인형의 유용성 평가. 미간행 박사학위논문, 성균관대학교 대학원.
  7. 김의환, 윤현, 김성섭(2004). 유도허벅다리걸기 기술 발휘 시 받기 자세와 저항수준에 따른 운동학적 특성분석 사례연구[1] 한국운동역학회지. 제14권 제3호 pp.203- 218.
  8. 김의환, 장은경, 설영윤, 최경택, 이상식(1986). 유도 국가대표선수 개인 특기기술의 생체역학적 분석. 1986년도 스포츠과학 연구과제 종합보고서. pp. 1-138, 서울 : 대한체육회 훈련원 스포츠과학연구소.
  9. 용인대학교유도학과교수(2000). 2000년 제27회 시드니올림픽대회 유도경기대비. 경기 : 용인대학교
  10. 유경훈(2000). 유도 경기의 사용 기술 분석에 관한 연구. 미간행 석사학위논문, 용인대학교 교육대학원.
  11. 윤 현(1992). 유도 우수선수 허벅다리걸기기술의 운동학적 특성분석. 미간행 석사학위논문, 국민대학교 교육대학원.
  12. 장순용(1997). 여자 유도 경기의 기술 빈도에 관한 연구. 미간행 석사학위논문, 경희대학교 체육과학대학원.
  13. 김의환, 김성섭, 정재욱(2005). 유도 허벅다리걸기 기술발휘 시 받기의 자세와 저항수준에 따른 중심변인 분석 사례연구[II]. 한국운동역학회지. 제15권 1호 pp.237 - 258.
  14. Asami T. (1978). Kinesiological Analysis of the 'Shizentai(Natural Posture)'. Bulletin of the Associa- tion for the Scientific Studies Judo Kodokan Report (5).
  15. David D. A. Winter, (1990). Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. second edition. Wiley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  16. Harter, R.A., & Bates, B.T.(1984). Kinematic and Temporal Characteristics of selected Judo Hip Throws. Biomechanics in Sports III. pp. 141-150.
  17. Kawamura, T., Asami, T., Takeuchi, Y., Nakamura, R., Shibayama, H., Tanka, H., Yanagisawa, H., Komata, K., & Nose, S. (1984a). "The Analysis of Basic Posture in judo", Bulletin of the Association of the Scientific Studies Judo Kodokan Teport 6. pp.93-98.
  18. Kawamura, T., Asami, T., Takeuchi, Y., Nakamura, R., Shibayama, H., Tanka, H., Yanagisawa, H., Komata, K., & Nose, S. (1984b). The Characteristics of the judo players' standing posture. Bulletin of the Association for the Scientific Studies Judo Kodokan Report (6). pp.99-106. Tokyo : Kodokan.
  19. Kwon, Y. H. (2001). KWON3D Motion Analysis Ver 3.1 Seoul: Visol Corp.
  20. Mann,R,V., & Pragure,P.G. A kinetic analysis of the Ground leg during sprint running. Research Quartly for Exercise and Sport 51.
  21. Nowolsky, M., (1988). On The Biomechanical Evaluation of Throwing Technique in judo. Theorie und Praxis Lelstungssport(Leipzing). 26. Beih., 55-71.
  22. Oswald, R., (1987). Technique Training and Evaluation in judo. Theorie und Praxis Lelstungssport (Leipzing). 25. 10: 60-68.
  23. Takahashi, R., (1992). The Application of Biomechanics To Judo Technique "Okuri-Ashi-Barahai"(Sweeping Ankle Throw). Sports Coach, 15, 4, Oct/Dec: 30-33.
  24. Zatsiorsky, V. M., Seluyanov, V. N. and Chugunova, L. (1990). In vivo body segment inertial parameters determination using a gammer-scanner method. Bio- mechanics of human
  25. 홈페이지(2004). http://www.athens2004.com/en/

Cited by

  1. Biomechanical Analysis of the Elderly Gait with a Walking Assistive Device vol.17, pp.2, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2007.17.2.001
  2. The Kinetic and EMG Analysis about Supporting Leg of Uke in Judo vol.17, pp.2, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2007.17.2.197