Mediating Role of Empowerment in the Relations to Job and Organizational Factors, and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment - Empirical Evidence from National University Hospital Employees -

직무요인, 조직요인과 직무만족, 조직몰입의 관계에서 임파워먼트의 매개역할 - 국립대학 병원근로자들을 중심으로 -

  • Lee, Hae-Jong (Department of Health Administration, College of Health Science, Yonsei University) ;
  • Yoon, Bang-Seob (Department of Business Administration, College of Government and Business, Yonsei University)
  • Published : 2005.09.01

Abstract

Objectives : The aim of this study was to examined the mediating role of empowerment in relations to job and organizational factors, and job satisfaction and organizational commitment in hospital organizations. Methods : Job variety, clarity, significance, and fitness were examined as the job factors, and security, reward justice, and organizational support as the organizational factors. Data were collected from 8 national university hospitals with 1,289 data points used for the final analysis. Results : All the job factors were found to positively influence empowerment, as were all the organizational factors, with the exception of reward justice . As hypothesized, empowerment had significant effects on both job satisfaction and organizational commitment, and was the most influential variable of all those examined. Conclusions : In the relations to job satisfaction, empowerment completely mediated job significance, security and organizational support, and partially mediated all other variables, with the exception of reward justice. In the relations to organizational commitment, empowerment completely mediated job variety and job fitness, and partially mediated all other variables, with the exception of reward justice. The theoretical and practical implications of these results have been discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Kirkman BL, Rosen B. Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Acad Manage J 1999; 42(1): 58-74 https://doi.org/10.2307/256874
  2. Hackman JR, Oldham GR. Work redesign. reading, 1980, Mass.: Addison-Wesley
  3. Conger JA, Kanungo RN. The empowering process: Integrating theory and practice. Acad Manage Rev 1988; 13: 471-482 https://doi.org/10.2307/258093
  4. Thomas KW, Velthous BA. Cognitive elements of empowerment: An 'interpretive' model of intrinsic task motivation. Acad Manage Rev 1990; 15:666-681 https://doi.org/10.2307/258687
  5. Gist ME. Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Acad Manage Rev 1987; 12: 472- 485 https://doi.org/10.2307/258514
  6. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. 1985, New York: Plenum Press
  7. Spreitzer GM. Psychological empowerment in the workplace: dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad Manage J 1995; 38: 1442-1465 https://doi.org/10.2307/256865
  8. Liden RC, Wayne SJ., & Sparrowe RT. An examination of the mediating role of psychologi cal empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. J Appl Psycho 2000; 85(3): 407-416 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.407
  9. Seo YJ, Kim JH. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment of medical insurance review nurses. Korean J Health Policy & Admin 2001; 11(1): 62-86 (Korean)
  10. Sawyer JE. Goal and process clarity: Specification of multiple construct of role ambiguity and a structural model of antecedents and consequences. J Appl Psycho 1992; 77: 130-142 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.77.2.130
  11. Gist M, Mitchell TN. Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Acad Manage Rev 1992; 17: 183- 211 https://doi.org/10.2307/258770
  12. Lee KE, Choi SJ, & Park KK. Determinants and consequences of career commitment. Korean Acad Manage J 2001; 9(2): 177-214 (Korean)
  13. Miller DB. Managing professionals in research and development. 1986, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
  14. Baik JC, Kim YK, & Yoon JH. The influence of leadership patterns on empowerment and organizational commitment of workers hotel. J Tourism Sci, 2002: 26(2); 73-95
  15. Quinn RE, Spreitzer GM. The road to empowerment: Seven questions every leader should consider. Organ Dynamics 1997: 26(2); 37-49 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(97)90004-8
  16. Lawler EE,III. High involvement management. 1986. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
  17. Guiterrez L, GlenMaye L, Delois K. The organizational context of empowerment practice: Implication of social work administration, Soc Work 1995; 40(2): 249-258
  18. Eisenberger R, Huntington R. Hutchison S, & Sowa D. Perceived organizational support. J Appl Psycho 1986; 71: 500-507 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
  19. Randall ML, Cropanzano R, Bormann CA, Birjulin A. Organizational politics and organizaitonal support as predictors of work organizational citizenship behavior. J Organ Behavior 1999; 20: 159-174 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199903)20:2<159::AID-JOB881>3.0.CO;2-7
  20. Eisenberger R, Cummings I, Armeli S., Lynch P. Perceived organizational support, discretiona ry treatment, and job satisfaction. J Appl Psycho 1997; 82: 812-820 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.812
  21. Wanous JP, Lawler EE,III. The measurement and meaning of job satisfaction, J Appl Psycho 1972; 56: 95-105 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032664
  22. Bass B. Leadership and performance beyond expectation. 1985, New York: Free Press
  23. Ashforth BE. The organizationally induced helplessness syndrome: A preliminary model. Can J Admin Sci 1990; 7: 30-36
  24. Spreitzer GM, Kizilos MA., Nason SW. A dimensional analysis of the relationship between psychological empowerment and effectiveness, satisfaction, and strain. J Manage 1997; 23: 679-704
  25. Koberg CS., Boss RW, Senjem JC, Goodman EA. Antecedents and outcomes of empowerment: Empirical evidence from the health care industry. Group & Organ Manage 1999; 24(1): 71-90 https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601199241005
  26. Kim JK, Lee YT. The impact of psychological empowerment on the job satisfaction. DaeHan J Business 2002; 31: 323-347 (Korean)
  27. Meyer JP, Allen NJ. A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Hum Resource Manage Rev 1991; 1: 61- 89 https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
  28. Mowday RT, Porter LW, Steers RM. Employee-organizational linkage: The psychology of commitment. 1982, New York: Academic Press
  29. Buchanan B. Building organizational committment: The socialization of managers in work organizaitons. Admin Sci Q 1974; 19: 533-546 https://doi.org/10.2307/2391809
  30. Rhee J. The effect on organizational justice and empowerment on organizational commitment. J Business Res 1998; 13(1): 253-272
  31. Kim GS. The effect of empowerment on organizational performance. DeaHan J Business 2000; 25: 1-26 (Korean)
  32. Eby LT, Freeman DM, Rush MC, Lance CE. Motivational bases of affective organizational commitment: A partial test of an integrative theoretical model, J Occup Organ Psycho 1999; 72: 463-483 https://doi.org/10.1348/096317999166798
  33. Price JL, Mueller CW. Handbook of organizati onal measurement. 1986, Scranton, PA: Harper Collins
  34. Rizzo JP, House RJ, Lirtzman SI. Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organization. Admin Sci Q 1970; 15: 150-163 https://doi.org/10.2307/2391486
  35. Oldham GR, Kulik CT, Stepina LP Ambrose ML. Relations between situational factors and the comparative referents used by employees, Acad Manage J, 1986; 29(3): 599-608 https://doi.org/10.2307/256226
  36. Brayfield AH, Rothe HF. An index of job satisfaction, J Appl Psycho 1951; 35: 307-311 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055617
  37. Allen NJ, Meyer JP. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization, J Occup Psycho 1990; 63: 1-18 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
  38. Lee SM. Covariance structure analysis. 1990, Sungwon-Sa (Korean)
  39. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderatemediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Personald Soc Psycho 1986; 51: 1172-1182
  40. Song KS, Choe MK, Park BG. An exploratory study on the mediating role of job satisfaction and organizational commitment in the relationships between OCB and its antecedents. Korean Acad Manage J 1999; 7(2): 139-189 (Korean)