Applied Microscopy

  • 제35권4호
  • /
  • Pages.55-63
  • /
  • 2005
  • /
  • 2287-5123(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-4445(eISSN)
한국현미경학회 (Korean Society of Microscopy)
권호 표지

쥐의 뇌 미세혈관 내피세포를 이용한 뇌혈관장벽 내피세포의 배양과 특성

Primary Culture and Characteristics of Blood-Brain Barrier Endothelial Cells from Rat Brain Microvessel

  • 이희상 (중앙대학교 의과대학 해부학교실) ;
  • 김석중 (중앙대학교 의과대학 해부학교실) ;
  • 김대진 (중앙대학교 의과대학 해부학교실) ;
  • 정윤희 (중앙대학교 의과대학 해부학교실) ;
  • 김성수 (중앙대학교 의과대학 해부학교실) ;
  • 이원복 (중앙대학교 의과대학 해부학교실) ;
  • 김경용 (중앙대학교 의과대학 해부학교실)
  • Lee, Hee-Sang (Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Kim, Seok-Jung (Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Kim, Dae-Jin (Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Chung, Yoon-Hee (Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Su (Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Lee, Won-Bok (Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Kim, Kyung-Yong (Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University)
  • 발행 : 2005.12.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

쥐의 뇌로부터 미세혈관에서 분리하고 배양한 내피세포의 특성을 현미경관찰, 면역염색과 전기저항을 측정해 관찰하였다. 미세혈관 내피세포는 배양 후 $5{\sim}6$일 경에 단층을 형성하였으며 특징적으로 소용돌이치는 모양을 나타냈다. 내피세포 단층의 전기저항은 배양 후 5일 경까지 따라 증가하였고 이후로는 감소하였다. 면역형광염색에서 anti-GFAP, anti-GalC, anti-neurofilament 160/200 kD antibody에 대한 면역반응을 거의 찾아볼 수 없었어 별아교세포, 희소돌기아교세포 및 신경세포에 의한 우려할 만한 오염은 배제할 수 있었다. vWF 항원에 대한 면역반응은 내피세포의 세포질에 Weibel-Palade 과립이 전반적으로 퍼져 있었다. 치밀이음부를 구성하는 occludin, ZO-1, ZO-2에 대한 면역반응은 내피세포의 접촉부위에서 매우 특징적으로 나타나고 있었다. 요약하면 쥐의 뇌 미세혈관 내피세포를 분리, 배양하여 형태학적, 조직면역 화학적 방법과 전기저항을 측정하여 내피세포의 특성을 확인하였다. 이 생체외 혈액뇌장벽 모델은 앞으로 진행될 액뇌장벽의 특징을 규명하고자 하는 시험관내 실험에 유용하게 이용될 수 있을 것이다.

The characteristics of primary cultured rat brain microvessel endothelial cells (RBMECs) were studied using microscopy, immunohistochemistry and measuring of transendothelial electrical resistance (TER). The RBMECs formed a monolayer by $5{\sim}6$ days after plating and showed characteristics of whirling appearance. The TER increased until day 5 and decreased then. There was few immunoreaction with anti-GFAP, anti-GalC, anti-neurofilament 160/200 kD antibodies. So the contamination of astrocyte, oligodendrocyte, and neuron. could be ruled out.. Immunoreaction to vWF antigen was widespread througout the cytoplasm as Weibel-Palade granule. Immunoreaction to tight junction proteins, i.e. occludin, ZO-1, and ZO-2 was seen at cell contact. In summary, RBMECs isolated and cultured showed morphological, immunohistochemical and electrical characteristics of blood-brain barrier (BBB). The in vitro BBB model can be used in studying characteristics of in vivo BBB.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abbott NJ, Hughes CC, Revest PA, Greenwood J: Development and characterization of a rat brain capillary endothelial culture: towards an in vitro blood-brain barrier. J Cell Sci 103 : 23-37, 1992
  2. Audus KL, Bartel RL, Hidalgo IJ, Borchardt RT: The use of cultured epithelial and endothelial cells for drug transport and metabolic studies. Pharm Res 7 : 435-451, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015800312910
  3. Audus KL, Borchardt RT: Characterization of an in vitro blood-brain barrier model system for studying drug transport and metabolism. Pharm Res 3 : 81-87, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016337202335
  4. Audus KL, Borchardt RT: Bovine brain microvessel endothelial cell monolayers as a model system for blood-brain barrier. Ann NY Acad Sci 507 : 9-18, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1987.tb45787.x
  5. Batter DK, Corpina RA, Roy C, Spray DC, Hertzberg EL, Kessler JA: Heterogeneity in gap junction expression in astrocytes cultured from different brain regions. Glia 6 : 213-221, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.440060309
  6. Bowman PD, Betz AL, Ar D, Wolinsky JS, Penney JB, Shivers RR, Goldstein GW: Primary culture of capillary endothelium from rat brain. In Vitro 17 : 353-362, 1981 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02618147
  7. Bowman PD, Ennis SR, Rarey KE, Betz AL, Goldstein GW: Brain microvessel endothelial cells in tissue culture: A model for study of blood-brain barrier permeability. Ann Neurol 14 : 396-402, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410140403
  8. Chen Z, Zandonatti M, Jakubouski D, Fox HS: Brain capillary endothelial cells express MBEC1, a protein that is related to the claustridium perfringens enterotoxin receptors, Lab Invest 78 : 353-363, 1998
  9. Cserr HF, Bindgaard M: Blood-brain interfaces in vertebrates: a comprehensive approach. Am J Physiol 246 : R277-R288, 1984
  10. De Bault LE, Kahn LE, Frommes SP, Cancilla PA: Cerebral microvessels and derived cells in tissue culture: isolation and preliminary characterization. In Vitro 15 : 473-487, 1979 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02618149
  11. Dehouck M P, Jolliet Riant P, Bree F, Fruchart J C, Cecchelli R, Tillement JP: Drug transfer across the bloodbrain barier: correlation between in vitro and in vivo models. J Neurochem 58 : 1790-1797, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1992.tb10055.x
  12. Demeuse Ph, Kerhofs A, Struys Ponsar C, Knoop B, Remacle C, Aguilar Ph: Compartmentalised coculture of rat brain endothelial cells and astrocyte: a synergistic model to study the blood-brain barrier. J Neurosci Methods 121 : 21-31, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0270(02)00225-X
  13. Eddy EP, Maleef BE, Hart TK, Smith PL: In vitro models to predict blood-brain barrier permeability. Adv Drug Del Rev 23 : 185-198, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(96)00435-8
  14. Fisher D, Kissel T: Histochemical characterization of primary capillary endothelial cells from brains using monoclonal antibodies and fluorescein isothiocyanate-labelled lectins: implications for drug delivery. Eur J Pharmapeut Biopharm 52 : 1-11, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0939-6411(01)00159-X
  15. Grabb PA, Gilbert MR: Neoplastic and pharmacological influence on the permeability of an in vitro blood-brain barrier. J Neurosurg 82 : 1053-1058, 1995 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1995.82.6.1053
  16. Greenwood J: Astrocytes, cerebral endthelium and cell culture: the persuit of an in vitro blood-brain barrier organ. Ann NY Acad Sci 633 : 426-430, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb15632.x
  17. Joo F: Endothelial cell of brain and other organ system: some similarities and differences, Progr Neurobiol 48 : S35-S37, 1993
  18. Male DK, Pryce G, Rahman J: Comparison of the immunological properties of rat cerebral and aortic endothelium, J Neuroimmunol 30 : 290-295, 1990
  19. Meresse S, Dehouck M P, Delorme P, Bensaid M, Tauber JP, Delbart C, Fruchart J C, Ceccelli R: Bovine brain endothelial cells express tight junctions and monoamine oxidase activity in long-term culture. J Neurochem 53 : 1363-1371, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1989.tb08526.x
  20. Panula P, Joo F, Rechardt L: Evidence for the presence of viable endothelial cells in culture derived from dissociated rat brain. Experimentia 34 : 95-97, 1978 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01921925
  21. Reese TS, Karnovsky MJ: Fine structural localization of a blood-brain barrier to exogenous peroxidase. J Cell Biol 34 : 207-217, 1967 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.34.1.207
  22. Shi F, Audus KL: Biochemical characterisitics of primary and passaged cultures of primate brain microvessel endothelial cells. Neurochem Res 19 : 427-433, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00967320
  23. Szabo CA, Deli MA, Ngo Thi Khue, Joo F: Production of pure primary rat endothelial cell culture; a comparison of different method. Neurobiol 5 : 1-16, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1002/neu.480050102
  24. Takasato Y, Rapoport SI, Smith QR: An in situ brain perfusion technique to study cerebrovascular transport in the rat. Am J Physiol 247 : H484-H493, 1984