Effect of Feed Monochloramination on Performance of RO Membranes

NH2Cl 사용으로 인한 RO 막의 성능 향상

  • Hong, Seungkwan ;
  • Reiss, Robert (Dept. of Civil Environmental Engineering, University of Central Florida) ;
  • Taylor, James S. (Dept. of Civil Environmental Engineering, University of Central Florida) ;
  • Beverly, Sharon (Dept. of Civil Environmental Engineering, University of Central Florida)
  • 홍승관 (고려대학교 공과대학 사회환경시스템공학과) ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • Received : 2005.01.13
  • Accepted : 2005.05.20
  • Published : 2005.06.15

Abstract

The 15 month pilot study was performed to investigate the effect of pretreatment by monochloramine ($NH_2Cl$) on the performance of RO membranes made of cellulose acetate (CA) and polyamide (PA). Both RO membranes experienced severe biological fouling without any pretreatment during the treatment of highly organic surface water in Florida, USA. Feed monochloramination at 5 mg/L significantly minimized productivity loss by effective control of biofouling. The CA membrane did not show any structural damages by monochloramine, while the PA membrane suffered from a gradual loss of membrane integrity by chlorine oxidation, which was characterized as an increase in productivity and a decrease in selectivity. The degradation of PA membrane increased with increasing monochloramine dose.

Keywords

References

  1. Avlonitis, S., Hanbury G., Hodgkiss, T. (1992) Chlorine degradation of aromatic polyamides, Desalination, 85, pp.321-334 https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-9164(92)80014-Z
  2. Beverly, S., Seal, S., Hong, S.(2000) Identification of Surface Chemical Functional Groups Correlated to Failure of Reverse Osmosis Polymeric Membranes, Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, 18(4), pp. 1107-1113 https://doi.org/10.1116/1.582308
  3. Glater, J., Hong, S., Elimelich, M. (1994). The search for a chlorine-resistant reverse osmosis membrane, Desalination, 95, pp. 325-345 https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-9164(94)00068-9
  4. Hong, S., Elimelich M. (1997) Chemical and Physical Aspects of NOM Fouling of NF Membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 132, pp. 159-181 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00060-4
  5. Kawaguchi T. Tamura H. (1984) Chlorine-resistant membrane for reverse osmosis. I. Correlation between chemical structures and chlorine resistance of polyamides, J. Applied Polymer Science, 29, pp.3359-3367 https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1984.070291113
  6. Koo J-Y., Petersen R. J., Cadotte J. E. (1986) ESCA characterization of chlorine damaged polyamide reverse osmosis membrane, ACS Polymer Prepr. 27(2), pp.391-392
  7. Lowell, J., Friesen, D., McCray, S., McDermott, S., Brose, D., Ray, R. (1987) Model Compounds as Predicfors of Chlorine Sensitivity of Interfacial Polymer RO Membranes. Bend Research, Bend, OR
  8. Reiss, R., Taylor J., Robert. C. (1999) Surface water treatment using nanofiltration: Pilot testing results and design consideration, Desalination, 125, pp.97-112 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(99)00127-7
  9. Ridgway, H., Flemming H. (1996) Membrane Biofouling, in Water Treatment Membrane Processes, AWWARF, McGraw Hill
  10. Taylor J., Hong S. (2000) Potable water quality and membrane technology, Journal of Laborafory Medicine, 31(10), pp. 563-568 https://doi.org/10.1309/54CT-M8LX-D1GN-203Q
  11. US EPA. (1999) Alternative disinfectants and oxidants guidance manual (EPA 815-R-99-014)