Effects of Surface Water Chemistry and Physicochemical Characteristics of Humic Acid on Fouling of Membrane

원수의 수질화학과 HA의 물리화학적 특성이 막 오염에 미치는 영향

  • Bae, Jin-Youl (Department of Environmental Engineering, The University of Seoul) ;
  • Han, Ihnsup (Department of Environmental Engineering, The University of Seoul) ;
  • Park, Sung-Ho (Department of Environmental Engineering, The University of Seoul) ;
  • Shin, Jee-Won (Department of Environmental Engineering, The University of Seoul)
  • 배진열 (서울시립대학교 환경공학부) ;
  • 한인섭 (서울시립대학교 환경공학부) ;
  • 박성호 (서울시립대학교 환경공학부) ;
  • 신지원 (서울시립대학교 환경공학부)
  • Received : 2005.01.05
  • Accepted : 2005.03.02
  • Published : 2005.05.30

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the removal efficiencies of pollutants and permeate fluxes depending on chemistry of feed water, various molecular weight cut-offs (MWCOs) and materials of membrane, operating pressure. We used seven MWCO membranes of YC0.5, YM1, YM3, YM10, YM30, YM100 and PM30, humic acid solution and surface water as feed water, and examined variation in permeate flux. Results of TOC removal experiment demonstrate that MWCO lower 1,000daltons could remove humic acid effectively. As increasing solution pH and decreasing divalent cations ($Ca^{2+}$) concentration, TOC removal increased. But $UV_{254}$ removal efficiency increased with higher divalent cation concentration and solution pH. Membrane fouling increased with increasing electrolyte (NaCl), divalent cation concentration and decreasing solution pH. In spite of initial permeate flux of the hydrophobic membrane (PM30) was higher than that of the hydrophilic membrane (YM30), flux decline of PM30 was significant during operation. At higher operating pressure, compactness of the cake layer on the membrane surface increased, resulting in gradual increase in hydraulic resistance.

Keywords

References

  1. 김규진, 분리막을 이용한 정수 및 폐수처리, 대한환경공학회지, 17(5), pp. 313-420 (1995)
  2. 김지훈, 최혁, 김형수, 염익태, 한기봉, Pilot 규모의 정수처리용 정밀여과 시스템에서 PACs 응집제가 투과 플럭스에 미치는 영향, 한국물환경학회지, 19(2), pp. 225-231 (2003)
  3. 김형수, 요코하마 $20만m^3$/일 막여과 정수처리 효율평가, 서울특별시 수도기술연구소, pp. 37-67 (2003)
  4. Childress, A. E. and Elimelech, M., Effect of Solution Chemistry on the Surface Charge of Polymeric Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Membranes, J Mem. Sci., 119(2), pp. 253-268 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(96)00127-5
  5. Fan, L., Harris, J. L., Roddick, F. A. and Booker, N. A., Influence of the Characteristics of Natural Organic Matter on the Fouling of Microfiltration Membranes, Wat. Res., 35( 18), pp. 4455-4463 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00183-X
  6. Hering, J. G. and Morel, F. M. M., Principle and Application of Aquatic Chemistry, Wiley, New York (1992)
  7. Jucker, C. and Clark, M. M., Adsorption of Aquatic Humic Acid Substances on Hydrop-Hobic Ultrafiltration Membranes, J Mem. Sci., 97(1-2), pp. 37-52 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(94)00146-P
  8. Meier-Haack, J., Booker, N. A. and Carroll, T., A Permeability-Controlled Microfiltration Membrane for Reduced Fouling in Drinking Water Treatment, Wat. Res., 37(3), pp. 585-588 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00360-3
  9. Sbai, M., Fievet, P., Szymczyk, A., Aoubiza, B., Vidonne, A. and Foissy, A., Streaming Potential, Electroviscous Effect, Pore Conductivity and Membrane Potential for the Determination of the Surface Potential of a Ceramic Ultrafiltration Membrane, J Mem. Sci, 215(1-2), pp. 1-9 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00553-7
  10. Yuan, W. and Zydney, A. L., Humic Acid Fouling during Ultrafiltration, Environ, Sci. Technol., 34(23), pp. 5043-5050 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1021/es0012366