Browse > Article

Effects of Surface Water Chemistry and Physicochemical Characteristics of Humic Acid on Fouling of Membrane  

Bae, Jin-Youl (Department of Environmental Engineering, The University of Seoul)
Han, Ihnsup (Department of Environmental Engineering, The University of Seoul)
Park, Sung-Ho (Department of Environmental Engineering, The University of Seoul)
Shin, Jee-Won (Department of Environmental Engineering, The University of Seoul)
Publication Information
Abstract
In this study, we investigated the removal efficiencies of pollutants and permeate fluxes depending on chemistry of feed water, various molecular weight cut-offs (MWCOs) and materials of membrane, operating pressure. We used seven MWCO membranes of YC0.5, YM1, YM3, YM10, YM30, YM100 and PM30, humic acid solution and surface water as feed water, and examined variation in permeate flux. Results of TOC removal experiment demonstrate that MWCO lower 1,000daltons could remove humic acid effectively. As increasing solution pH and decreasing divalent cations ($Ca^{2+}$) concentration, TOC removal increased. But $UV_{254}$ removal efficiency increased with higher divalent cation concentration and solution pH. Membrane fouling increased with increasing electrolyte (NaCl), divalent cation concentration and decreasing solution pH. In spite of initial permeate flux of the hydrophobic membrane (PM30) was higher than that of the hydrophilic membrane (YM30), flux decline of PM30 was significant during operation. At higher operating pressure, compactness of the cake layer on the membrane surface increased, resulting in gradual increase in hydraulic resistance.
Keywords
Membrane fouling; Molecular weight cut-off (MWCO); Humic acid; Permeate flux; Flux decline; Hydraulic resistance;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 김규진, 분리막을 이용한 정수 및 폐수처리, 대한환경공학회지, 17(5), pp. 313-420 (1995)
2 김형수, 요코하마 $20만m^3$/일 막여과 정수처리 효율평가, 서울특별시 수도기술연구소, pp. 37-67 (2003)
3 Jucker, C. and Clark, M. M., Adsorption of Aquatic Humic Acid Substances on Hydrop-Hobic Ultrafiltration Membranes, J Mem. Sci., 97(1-2), pp. 37-52 (1994)   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Meier-Haack, J., Booker, N. A. and Carroll, T., A Permeability-Controlled Microfiltration Membrane for Reduced Fouling in Drinking Water Treatment, Wat. Res., 37(3), pp. 585-588 (2003)   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Childress, A. E. and Elimelech, M., Effect of Solution Chemistry on the Surface Charge of Polymeric Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Membranes, J Mem. Sci., 119(2), pp. 253-268 (1996)   DOI   ScienceOn
6 김지훈, 최혁, 김형수, 염익태, 한기봉, Pilot 규모의 정수처리용 정밀여과 시스템에서 PACs 응집제가 투과 플럭스에 미치는 영향, 한국물환경학회지, 19(2), pp. 225-231 (2003)
7 Yuan, W. and Zydney, A. L., Humic Acid Fouling during Ultrafiltration, Environ, Sci. Technol., 34(23), pp. 5043-5050 (2000)   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Sbai, M., Fievet, P., Szymczyk, A., Aoubiza, B., Vidonne, A. and Foissy, A., Streaming Potential, Electroviscous Effect, Pore Conductivity and Membrane Potential for the Determination of the Surface Potential of a Ceramic Ultrafiltration Membrane, J Mem. Sci, 215(1-2), pp. 1-9 (2003)   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Hering, J. G. and Morel, F. M. M., Principle and Application of Aquatic Chemistry, Wiley, New York (1992)
10 Fan, L., Harris, J. L., Roddick, F. A. and Booker, N. A., Influence of the Characteristics of Natural Organic Matter on the Fouling of Microfiltration Membranes, Wat. Res., 35( 18), pp. 4455-4463 (2001)   DOI   ScienceOn