A Cytotaxonamical study of Rubus (Rosaceae) in Korea

한국산 산딸기속(Rubus)의 세포분류학적 연구

  • Yang, Ji Young (Department of Biology, College of Natural Sciences, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Pak, Jae-Hong (Department of Biology, College of Natural Sciences, Kyungpook National University)
  • 양지영 (경북대학교 자연과학대학 생물학과) ;
  • 박재홍 (경북대학교 자연과학대학 생물학과)
  • Received : 2005.05.10
  • Accepted : 2005.06.14
  • Published : 2005.06.30

Abstract

Somatic chromosome numbers of 19 taxa of Korean Rubus was investigated. Subg. Anoplobatus (2 species), subg. Cylactis (1 species), subg. Idaeobatus (15 taxa) and subg. Malachobatus (1 species) are found in Korea. All taxa belonging to subg. Idaeobatus except for R. parvifolius which shows tetrapolid and hexaploid are diploid. The basic chromosome number of the genus was x=7. New chromosome numbers for 5 taxa were reported here: R. hongnoensis of Jeju-island endemic species, 2n=14; R. longisepalus, 2n=14; R. longisepalus var. tozawai, 2n=14; R. parvifolius, 2n=28; R. parvifolius var. taquetii, 2n=28. The rest 12 taxa except for R. coreanus Miq was well counted as 2n=14 and well consistent with previous reports from China and Japan. Our new chromosome level for R. parvifolius as 6x may indicate that speciation by polyploidization has occurred within Korean population. Unlikely to Japanese population (2n=42), Korean population of R. buergeri has same ploidy level with Taiwanese population as 2n=56.

한국산 산딸기속(Rubus)의 체세포 염색체 수를 밝히기 위해 19개 분류군을 조사하였다. 한반도에는 Anoplobatus(2종), Cylactis(1종), Idaeobatus(15종), Malachobatus(1종) 4개 아속의 산딸기속 분류군이 분포하며, 대부분(15종)이 2배체가 우세한 Idaeobatus아속에 속한다. 체세포 염색체 수의 기본수는 x=7이며, 본 연구에서 체세포 염색체수가 처음으로 밝혀진 분류군은 제주도의 특산종인 가시딸기(R. hongnoensis; 2n=14), 울릉도의 특산종인 섬나무딸기(R. takesiemnsis; 2n=14), 거제도에서 분포하는 맥도딸기(R. longisepalus; 2n=14)와 거제딸기(R. longisepalus var. tozawai; 2n=14), 멍석딸기(R. parvifolius; 2n=42), 사슨딸기(R. parvifolius var. taquetii; 2n=28)등 6분류군이다. 복분자(R. coreanus)를 제외한 나머지 12개 분류군의 체세포 염색체 수는 2n=14로 확인하였으며, 모두 일본과 타이완 등의 연구보고와 일치하였다. 또한 이배체로 알려진 멍석딸기는 4, 6배수체가 발견되어 한반도에서 배수화로 종분화가 일어나고 있음을 보여주었다. 또한 겨울딸기(R. buergeri; 2n=56)으로 8배체임을 알았고, 이는 일본에 분포하는 2n=42, 6배체와 비교할 때, 타이완에 분포하는 분류군(2n=56)과 동일한 8배체임을 보여주었다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 환경부

References

  1. Alice, L. A. and C. S. Campbell 1999. Phylogeny of Rubus (Rosaceae) based on nuclear Ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer region sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 86: 1-97 https://doi.org/10.2307/2656950
  2. Chen, R. 1993. Chromosome atlas of Chinese principal econorruc plants. Tomus 1. Chromosome Atlas of Chinese Fruit Tree and their Close Wild Relatives. International Academic Publishers. Beijing. Pp, 263-264
  3. Focke, W. O. 1910. Species Ruborum monographiae generis Rubiprodromus. Bibl. Bot. 17: 1-120
  4. Focke, W. O. 1911. Species Ruborum rnonographiae generis Rubiprodromus. Bibl. Bot. 17: 121-223
  5. Focke, W. O. 1914. Species Ruborum monographiae generis Rubiprodromus. Bibl. Bot. 19: 224-498
  6. Gustafsson, A. 1943. The genesis of the European blackberry flora. Acta. Univ. Lund. 39: 1-200
  7. Iwatsubo, Y. and N. Naruhashi. 1991. Karyomorphological and cytogenetical studies of Rubus pannfolius, R. coreanus and R. $\times$ hiraseanus (Rosaceae). Cytologia 56: 151-156 https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.56.151
  8. Iwatsubo, Y, H. Masaki, O. Kume, Y. Arki and N. Naruhashi. 1992. Chromosome number of Rubus $\times$ pseudosieboldii (Rosaceae). J. Jap. Bot. 67: 10-14
  9. Iwatsubo, Y and N. Naruhashi. 1992. Cytotaxonomical studies of Rubus (Rosaceae) I. Chromosome numbers of 20 species and 2 natural hybrids. J. Jap, Bot. 67: 270-275
  10. Iwatsubo, Y. 1993a. Cytogenetical study of Rubus $\times$ tawadanus (Rosaceae). Cytologia 58: 217-221 https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.58.217
  11. Iwatsubo, Y. 1993b. Cytotaxonomical studies of Rubus (Rosaceae) II. Chromosome numbers of 20 speceis and 2 natural hybrids. J. Jap, Bot. 68: 159-165
  12. Iwatsubo, Y and H. E. Weber. 1995. Chromosome numbers of European blackberries (Rubus subg. Rubus, Rosaceae). PI. syst .& Evol. 198: 143-149 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985110
  13. Iwatsubo, Y. 1996. Cytogenetic relationship between Rubus croceacanthus and R. minusculus (Rosaceae). Cytologia 61: 163-167 https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.61.163
  14. Iwatsubo, Y. 1999. Chromosome study of triploid Rubus paroifolius (Rosaceae). J. Phytogeogr, Taxon. 47: 51-53
  15. Jino, T. 1951. The chromosomes in Rubus II. Jap. J. Genet. 26: 133-13 https://doi.org/10.1266/jjg.26.133
  16. Jino, T. 1958. Cytogenetic and cytoecological studies on some Japanese species of Rubus. II. Chromosomes. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 71: 15-23 https://doi.org/10.15281/jplantres1887.71.15
  17. Lee, Y. N. 1996. Flora of Korea. Kyohaksa, Seoul. Pp. 332-338. (in Korean)
  18. Naruhashi, N. 1989. Notes on Japanese Rubus (4). J. Phytogeogr. Taxon. 37: 1-4
  19. Naruhashi, N and Y. Iwatsubo. 1993. Chromosome number of Japanese Rubus. Acta Hort. 352: 429-431
  20. Naruhashi, N, M. Aoki, Y. Iwatsubo, O. Kume, and H. Masaki. 1998. Chromosome and distributions of Rubus buergeri and R. hakonensis (Rosaceae) in Japan. J. Phytogeogr. Taxon. 46: 47-55
  21. Naruhashi, N, Y. Iwatsubo and C.-I. Peng 2002. Chromosome numbers in Rubus (Rosaceae) of Taiwan. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. 43: 193-201
  22. Sun, B. Y. and T. F. Stuessy 1998. Preliminary observations on the evolution of endemic angiosperms of Ullung Island, Korea. Evolution and Speciation of Island plants. Cambridge University Press, UK. Pp. 181-202
  23. Suzuki, W. 1990. Comparative Ecology of Rubus Species (Rosaceae) II. Reproductive Charateristics of Three Rubus Species, R. palmaius var. coptophyllus, R. microphyllus and R. crataegifolius. PI. Spec. Biol. 5: 263-275 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-1984.1990.tb00186.x
  24. Tawan, C, T. Sato and N. Naruhashi 1991. Taxonomical studiesof Rubus & Related species in Mt. Kinabalu, Borneo II. Flower and Fruit. J. Phytogeogr. Taxon. 39: 31-39
  25. Thompson, M. M. 1995. Chromosome numbers of Rubus species at National Clonal Germplasm Repository. Hortsciences 30: 1447-1452
  26. Thompson, M. M. 1997. Survey of chromosome numbers in Rubus (Rosaceae: Rosoideae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 84: 128- 164 https://doi.org/10.2307/2399958
  27. Waugh, R., W.TG. van de Yen, M. S. Phillips and W. Powell. 1990. Chloroplast DNA diversity in the genus Rubus (Rosaceae) revealed by Southern Hybridization. PI. Syst. Evol. 172: 65-75 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937798
  28. Weber, H. E. 1996. Former & Modem taxonomic treatment of the Apomictic Rubus complex. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 31: 378-380
  29. Wu, Zhengyi and P. H. Raven 2003. Flora of China. 9: 195-285. Science Press, Beijing and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis