References
- Deplazes P, Peters O, Barbakow F. Comparing apical preparations of root canals shaped by nickel-titanium rotary instruments and nickel-titanium hand instruments. J Endod 27(3):196-202, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200103000-00015
- Esposito PT, Cunningham CJ. A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments. J Endod 21(4):173-6, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80560-1
- Schafer E, Schulz-Bongert U, Tulus G. Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: a clinical study. J Endod 30(6):432-5, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200406000-00014
- Coleman CL, Svec TA. Analysis of Ni-Ti versus stainless steel instrumentation in resin simulated canals. J Endod 23(4):232-235, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80053-2
- Garip Y, Gunday M. The use of computed tomography when comparing nickel-titanium and stainless steel files during preparation of simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 34(6):452-457, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00416.x
- Schafer E. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 92(2):215-220, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2001.114622
- Hata G, Uemura M, Kato AS, Imura N, Novo NF, Toda T. A comparison of shaping ability using ProFile, GT file, and Flex-R endodontic instruments in simulated canals. J Endod 28(4):316-321, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200204000-00014
- Ankrum MT, Hartwell GR, Truitt JE. K3 Endo, ProTaper, and ProFile systems: breakage and distortion in severely curved roots of molars. J Endod 30(4):234-237, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200404000-00013
- Bergmans L, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Beullens M, Wevers M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P. Progressive versus constant tapered shaft design using NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 36(4):288-295, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00650.x
- Clauder T, Baumann MA. ProTaper NT system. Dent Clin North Am 48(1):87-111, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2003.10.006
- Baumann MA, Roth A. Effect of experience on quality of canal preparation with rotary nickel-titanium files. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 88(6):714-718, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70015-6
- Gluskin AH, Brown DC, Buchanan LS. A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators. Int Endod J 34(6):476-484, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00422.x
- Sonntag D, Guntermann A, Kim SK, Stachniss V. Root canal shaping with manual stainless steel files and rotary Ni-Ti files performed by students. Int Endod J 36(4):246-255, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00661.x
- Sonntag D, Delschen S, Stachniss V. Root-canal shaping with manual and rotary Ni-Ti files performed by students. Int Endod J 36(11):715-723, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00703.x
- Hanni S, Schonenberger K, Peters OA, Barbakow F. Teaching an engine-driven preparation technique to undergraduates: initial observations. Int Endod J 36(7):476-82, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00677.x
- Qualtrough AJ, Dummer PM. Undergraduate endodontic teaching in the United Kingdom: an update. Int Endod J 30(4):234-239, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1997.tb00703.x
- Qualtrough AJ, Whitworth JM, Dummer PM. Preclinical endodontology: an international comparison. Int Endod J 32(5):406-414, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00253.x
- Calhoun G, Montgomery S. The effects of four instrumentation techniques on root canal shape. J Endod 14(6):273-277, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80025-6
- Kosa DA, Marshall G, Baumgartner JC. An analysis of canal centering using mechanical instrumentation techniques. J Endod 25(6):441-445, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80275-1
- Parashos P, Messer HH. Questionnaire survey on the use of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments by Australian dentists. Int Endod J 37(4):249-259, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00784.x
- Yared G, Bou Dagher F, Kulkarni K. Influence of torque control motors and the operator's proficiency on ProTaper failures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 96(2):229-233, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(03)00167-7
- Szep S, Gerhardt T, Leitzbach C, Luder W, Heidemann D. Preparation of severely curved simulated root canals using engine-driven rotary and conventional hand instruments. Clin Oral Investig 5(1):17-25, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00010680
- Yared GM, Dagher FE, Machtou P, Kulkarni GK. Influence of rotational speed, torque and operator proficiency on failure of Greater Taper files. Int Endod J 35(1):7-12, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00443.x
- Calberson FL, Deroose CA, Hommez GM, De Moor RJ. Shaping ability of ProTaper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin root canals. Int Endod J 37(9):613-623, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00860.x
- Yun HH, Kim SK. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 95(2):228-233, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2003.92
- Schafer E, Vlassis M. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 37(4):229-238, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00786.x
- Iqbal MK, Firic S, Tulcan J, Karabucak B, Kim S. Comparison of apical transportation between ProFile and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 37(6):359-364, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00792.x
- Slaus G, Bottenberg P. A survey of endodontic practice amongst Flemish dentists. Int Endod J 35(9):759-767, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00564.x
- European Society of Endodontology. Undergraduate curriculum guidelines for endodontology. Int Endod J 34(8):574-580, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0143-2885.2001.00508.x
- Berutti E, Chiandussi G, Gaviglio I, Ibba A. Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: ProTaper versus ProFile. J Endod 29(1):15-9, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200301000-00005
Cited by
- Comparison of shaping ability of rotary Ni-Ti file systems used by undergraduates vol.31, pp.1, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.1.001
- Comparison of shaping ability between various hybrid instrumentation methods with ProTaper vol.31, pp.1, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.1.011
- Comparison of shaping ability between single length technique and crown-down technique using Mtwo rotary file vol.32, pp.4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.4.385
- Comparison of shaping ability using various Nickel-Titanium rotary files and hybrid technique vol.32, pp.6, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.6.530
- Stress distribution of three NiTi rotary files under bending and torsional conditions using 3-dimensional finite element analysis vol.33, pp.4, 2008, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.4.323
- Stress distribution of three NiTi rotary files under bending and torsional conditions using a mathematic analysis vol.42, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01481.x
- Prognostic factors influencing clinical outcome of nonsurgical endodontic treatment vol.35, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.6.436