초록
과학영재 판별의 대안적 도구로서의 가능성을 찾아보기 위하여 영재 집단과 일반 집단의 뇌파검사를 실시하였다. 뇌파의 주성분 공간분석법인 PCA분석 자료의 집단별 차이점을 이용하여 과학영재 판별지수(Gifted Index: G-Index)를 개발하고 과학영재 판별의 가능성을 탐색하여 보았더니 76% 수준에서의 판별 효과를 얻을 수 있었다. 또 과학영재 판별이 가능한 기타 판별도구 성취도들 간의 상관관계를 바탕으로 하여 회귀분석을 시도한 결과는로 나타났다. 이를 근거로 한 영재 판별 확률식을 제안하면 $$P=\frac 1{1+e^{-[-0.018(TTCT)+0.057(IQ)+1.916(FASP)+0.682(V.T)+0.088(Exp.)+0.034(G-Index)-57.510]}}$$와 같고 이 회귀분석식을 적용한 결과 영재 집단 내에서의 판별 가능성이 95% 수준에서 매우 우수하였다. 따라서 과학영재 판별의 대안적 도구로서의 뇌파검사와 G-Index의 유용성을 확인할 수 있었다.
In this study we investigated the adequacy of tools for distinction gifted students through the comparison these mutual relation on the basis of data, like paper test, the depths interview score, and the rest data((TTCT: Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking, IQ test, FASP: Find A Shape Puzzle, V.T: Visualization Tests and Exp: experimental ability test), and analysis data of EEG test for examining the adequacy of tools for identification gifted students. So, we developed Brain Wave gifted Index(G-Index) for finding another distinction ability as using brain waves data. The standard of index development use gifted brain characteristic in closed-eyes rest state which is judged like that characteristic of distinction between gifted and normal students is the most clear and consistence. That is, the degree of unified pattern between each object and gifted PCA pattern was defined by Pearson method which added spatial mutual index to weight concept. This refer to mean number of spatial PCA pattern. Searching for the possibility of distinction gifted gave distinction effect in 76%. The result of regression analysis on the basis of mutual relation between the rest data is . The probability formula for distinct gifted group is as follow. $$P=\frac 1{1+e^{-[-0.018(TTCT)+0.057(IQ)+1.916(FASP)+0.682(V.T)+0.088(Exp.)+0.034(G-Index)-57.510]}}$$ The result of this calculation showed that probability for distinct in gifted group was very good(95.0%). On the basis of upper result, tools for identification gifted students should be estimated as using many-sided estimation data whatever possible. And following study about development, and operation of tools for distinction suitable to gifted student in science should be progressed.
