한국동물위생학회지 (Korean Journal of Veterinary Service)

  • 제27권3호
  • /
  • Pages.239-247
  • /
  • 2004
  • /
  • 3022-7372(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7630(eISSN)
한국동물위생학회 (The Korean Society of Veterinary Service)
권호 표지

전북지역에서 발생한 돼지콜레라의 역학적 특성

Epidemiological characteristics of classical swine fever outbreak at Jeonbuk area in 2003

  • 엄성심 (전라북도축산진흥연구소) ;
  • 이정원 (전라북도축산진흥연구소) ;
  • 서이원 (전라북도축산진흥연구소) ;
  • 배정준 (전라북도축산진흥연구소) ;
  • 정동석 (전라북도축산진흥연구소)
  • Eum Sung-Shim (Jeonbuk Livestock Development & Research Institute) ;
  • Lee Jeoung-Won (Jeonbuk Livestock Development & Research Institute) ;
  • Seo Lee-Won (Jeonbuk Livestock Development & Research Institute) ;
  • Bea Joung-Jun (Jeonbuk Livestock Development & Research Institute) ;
  • Joung Dong-Suk (Jeonbuk Livestock Development & Research Institute)
  • 발행 : 2004.12.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Classical swine fever (CSF) was confirmed in 19 herds in Jeunbuk provence (Iksan, Gimje, Wanju, Buan, and Jangsu) in Korea between March and May, 2003 and 10,263 pigs were slaughtered. Pigs contacted with CSF virus in primary outbreak farm show fever, reduced appetite, arched back and chill in company with sever respirative sign and then most infected farms also were observed to fever, reduced appetite, sudden death, and leukopenia (101 pigs). In order to detecting infectious pig with CSF virus, A total of 555 pigs were inspected in 65 herds and blood samples were collected and serological test (ELISA), antigen ELISA, and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) had been done. Positive rate were $74\%$ (410 pigs) in antibody ELISA, $2\%$ (11 pigs) in antigen ELISA and $33\%$ (182 pigs) in RT-PCR, respectively. As shown that the RT-PCR was useful than the ELISA for determining CSF virus in blood, meat, and other organs.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Jones TC, Hunt RD. 1983. Hog cholera, In: Veterinary pathology. 5th ed. Lea & Febiger, Philadelpia:412-420
  2. Allen DL, Barbara ES, William LM, et al. 1992. Hog cholera, In : Disease of swine. 7th ed. Iowa State Univ. Press Ames, USA:274-285
  3. 우영제. 1997. 임상증상으로 본 돼지질병, 양돈연구:359-368
  4. Hanson RP. 1957. Origin of hog cholera. JAVMA 131:211-218
  5. Cole, C. G, Henley RR, Dale CN, et al. 1962. History of hog cholera research in the US Department of Agriculture. 1884-1960. Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 241, USDA, Washington DC
  6. Sharpe K, Gibbens J, Morris H, et al. 2001. Epidermiology of the 2000 CSF outbreak in East Anglia : preliminary findings. Vet Rec 148(3):91
  7. Artois M, Depener KR, Guberti V, et al. 2002. Classical swine fever(hog cholera) in wild boar in Europe. Rev Sci Tech 21(2):287-303
  8. Biagetti M, Grei-Wilke I, Rutili D. 2001. Molecular epidemiology of classical swine fever in Italy. Vet Microbiol 83(3):205-215 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(01)00424-2
  9. Laddomada A. 2000. Incidence and control of CSF in wild boar in Europe. Vet Microbiol 73(2-3):121-130
  10. 송재영. 2001. 국내 분리 돼지콜레라 바이러스의 분자생물학적 특성과 유전자 재조합 E2단백질의 항원성에 관한 연구. 건국대학교박사학위논문
  11. Van Oiruschot JT, Terpstra C. 1989. Hog cholera virus. In: Virus infections of porcines. Elsever Science Publishers. New York:113-130
  12. Ressang AA. 1973. Studies on the pathogenesis of hog cholera. I. Demonstration of hog cholera virus subsequent to oral exposure. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B 20(4):256-271
  13. Moenning V, Floegel NG, Greiser-Wilke I. 2003. Clinical signs and epidermiology of classical swine fever: A review of new knowledge. Vet J 165(1):11-20 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-0233(02)00112-0
  14. Mengeling WL, Packer RA. 1969. Pathogenesis of chronic hog cholera: Host response. Am J Vet Res 30(3):409-417
  15. Cheville NF, Mengling WL, 1969. The pathogenesis of chronic hog cholera (swine fever). Histologic, immunofluorescent, and electron microscopic studies. Lab Invest 2(3):261-274
  16. 가축전염병발생월보. 1999
  17. 박종우. 2001. 주요가축전염병 통계. 수의과학정보 13:71-73
  18. 돼지콜레라 정밀검사법. 2003. 국립수의과학검역원 질병연구부 바이러스과. 발간등록번호 11-1380644-000033-01