Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지

The Distribution of Implant Patients and the Type of Implant Site

임플란트 환자의 분포 및 식립부 유형

  • Park, Ji-Eun (Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Reasearch Institute for Periodontal Regeneration) ;
  • Yun, Jeong-Ho (Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Reasearch Institute for Periodontal Regeneration) ;
  • Jung, Ui-Won (Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Reasearch Institute for Periodontal Regeneration) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Seong (Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Reasearch Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Brain Korea 21 project for Medical Science) ;
  • Cho, Kyoo-Sung (Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Reasearch Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Brain Korea 21 project for Medical Science) ;
  • Chai, Jung-Kiu (Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Reasearch Institute for Periodontal Regeneration) ;
  • Kim, Chong-Kwan (Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Reasearch Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Brain Korea 21 project for Medical Science) ;
  • Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Reasearch Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Brain Korea 21 project for Medical Science)
  • 박지은 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직 재생연구소) ;
  • 윤정호 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직 재생연구소) ;
  • 정의원 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직 재생연구소) ;
  • 김창성 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직 재생연구소, BK21 의과학 사업단) ;
  • 조규성 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직 재생연구소, BK21 의과학 사업단) ;
  • 채중규 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직 재생연구소) ;
  • 김종관 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직 재생연구소, BK21 의과학 사업단) ;
  • 최성호 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직 재생연구소, BK21 의과학 사업단)
  • Published : 2004.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Nowdays, the awareness of implant treatment has grown rapidly among dentists and patients alike in Korea, as it becomes a widely accepted treatment. The reason is that unlike crown and bridge or denture treatment, implant treatment helps preserve existing bone and improve masticatory functions. So, It is needed understanding about the type, distribution of implant patient. The following results on patient type and implant distribution were compiled from 4433 implant cases of 1596 patients treated at the periodontal dept. of Y University Hospital during 1992 to 2004. 1. There are no dissimilarities between men and women, with patients in their 40, 50s accounting for 52.5% of patients and 57.5% of implant treatments; the largest share of patients and implant treatments. 2. Mn. posterior area accounted for 54.9% of implant treatments followed by Mx. posterior area(27.6%), Mx anterior area(11.9%) and Mn anterior area(5.6%). 3. Partial edentulous patients treated by single crown and bridge-type prosthesis accounted for 97.5% and fully edentulous patient accounted for the remaining 2.5%. 4. The major cause of tooth loss is periodontal disease, followed by dental caries, trauma and congenital missing. Also, older people are more likely to suffer from tooth loss due to periodontal disease rather than dental caries. 5. In the distribution of bone quality for maxillae, type III was most, followed by type II, r type IV and r type I. As for mandible, type II was most, followed by type III, type IV and for type I. 6. In the distribution of bone quantity for maxillae, type C was most, followed by type B, type D, type A, and for type E. As for mandible, type B was 52% most, followed by type C, type D, type A and type E. 7. The majority of implants were those of 1O-14mm in length (85.2%) and regular diameter in width (64%). The results provided us with basic data on patient type, implant distribution, bone condition, etc. We wish that our results coupled with other research data helps assist in the further study for better implant success/survival rates, etc.

Keywords

References

  1. Marcus SE, Drury JF, Brown LS. Tooth retention and tooth loss in the permanent dentition of adults: United States, 1988-1991. J Dent Res 1996;75:684-695 https://doi.org/10.1177/002203459607502S08
  2. 통계청. 1999년 생명표. 2001년8월
  3. Waerhaug J. Periodontology and partial prosthesis. Int Dent J 1968;18(1):101-107
  4. Carlsson G, Persson G. Morphologic changes of the mandible after extraction and wearing dentures : A longitudinal clinical and x-ray cephalometric study covering 5 years. Odont Revy 1967;18:27-54
  5. Pietrokovski J. The bony residual ridge in man. J Prosthet Dent 1975;34:456-462 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(75)90166-3
  6. Carr A, Laney WR. Maximum occlusal force levels in patients with ,uosseointegrated oral implant prosthesis and patient with complete dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:101-110
  7. Wetherell J, Smales R. : Partial dentures failure: A long-term clinical survey. J Dent Res 1980;8:333-340 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(80)90049-4
  8. Anjardn R. Mayan dental wonders. Oral Implant 1981;9:423
  9. Branemark PI, Breine U, Adel R, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J & Olsson A. : Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prosthesis. I. Experimental studies. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1969;3:81-100 https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316909036699
  10. Bruno C, Hugo D, Bruyn. Comparison of Br${\aa}$nemark fixture integration and short-term survival using one-stage or two-stage surgery in completely and partially edentulous mandibles. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:131-175 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090209.x
  11. Buser D, Mericske-stem R. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-172 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x
  12. Lekholm U. Survival of the Br${\aa}$nemark implant in partially edentulous jaws : A 10 year prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:639-645
  13. Lindh T, GunneJ, Tillberg A, Molin M. A metaanalysis of implants in partial edentulism. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:80-90 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090203.x
  14. Ericsson I, Nilson H, Lindh T, Nilner K, Randow K. Immediate functional loading of Branernark single tooth implants : An 18 months' clinical pilot follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:26-33 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011001026.x
  15. Henry PH, Laney W.R, Jemt T. Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement : a prospective 5 years multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:450-455
  16. Schnitman et al Ten-year results for Branemark implants immediately loaded with fixed prosthesis implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:495-503
  17. 한창식, 허남기, 김연미. 최신 치과임플란트. 지성출판사, 2001
  18. Atwood DA. Postextraction changes in the adult mandible as illustrated by microradiographs of midsagital sections and serial cephalometric roentgenograms. J Prosthet Dent 1963;13:810-824 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(63)90225-7
  19. Lekholm U, Zarb G, Branemark PI, Tissue integrated prostheses Osseointegration in clinical dentistry, Chicago, Quintensence., 1985;199-209
  20. Minsk L, Polson A, Weisgold A. Outcome failures of endosseous implant from a clinical training center. Compendium 1996;17(9):848-859
  21. Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers. A mixed longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27:120-132 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(72)90188-6
  22. Meskin LH, Brown LJ. Prevalence and patterns of tooth loss in the us employed adult and senior populations. J Dent Educ 1988;52:686-691
  23. U.S. department of Health and Human Services. Oral health of U.S. adults, national findings, NIH Publ No 1987;(87):28-68
  24. Watson MT. Implant dentistry: A 10-year retrospective report. Dental Products Report 1996;Dec:26-32
  25. Friberd B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Br${\aa}$nemark dental implants : A study from stage 1 surgery to the connections of complete prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:132-146
  26. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Br${\aa}$nemark fixtures in type N bone : AS-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991;62(1):2-4 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.1.2
  27. Pietrokovski J, Massler M. Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction. J Prosthet Dent 1967;17:21-27 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(67)90046-7
  28. Pietrokovski J, Sorin S, Hirschfeld Z. The residual ridge in partially edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent 1976;36(2)150-157
  29. Buser D, Bragger U, Lang NP, Nyman S. Regeneration and enlargement of jaw bone using guided bone regeneration. Clinical Oral Implants Research 1990;1:22-32 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010104.x
  30. Simion, M, Jovanovic SA, Trisi P, Scarano A, Piattelli A. Vertical ridge augmentation using a membrane technique and autogenous bone or allograft in humans. Int J. Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 1998;16:221-229
  31. Carlsson L, Rostlund T, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson T. Removal torques for polished and rough titanium impalnts. lnt J Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 1988;3:21-24
  32. Gofredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: an experimental study in rabbits. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2000;2(3):120-128 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00002.x
  33. Collaert B, De Bruyn H. Comparison of Branemark fixture integration and short-term survival usingone-stage or two-stage surgery in completely and partially edentulous mandibles. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9(2):131-5 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090209.x