DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

복합레진 수복시 와동의 크기 및 수복 방법이 교두 굴곡에 미치는 영향

INFLUENCE OF CAVITY SIZE AND RESTORATION METHODS ON THE CUSP DEFLECTION IN COMPOSITE RESTORATION

  • 이미라 (서울대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 이인복 (서울대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 석창인 (서울대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 이상탁 (서울대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 엄정문 (서울대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Lee Mi-Ra (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee In-Bog (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Seok Chang-In (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee Sang-Tag (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Um Chung-Moon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 발행 : 2004.11.01

초록

The aim of this study was to measure the cusp deflection during composite restoration for MOD cavity in premolar and to examine the influence of cavity dimension, C-factor and restoration method on the cusp deflection. Thirty extracted maxillary premolar were prepared to four different sizes of MOD cavity and divided into six groups. The width and depth of the cavity were as follows. Group 1; $1.5{\;}{\times}{\;}1{\;}mm$, Group 2; $1.5{\;}{\times}{\;}2{\;}mm$, Group 3; $3{\;}{\times}{\;}1{\;}mm$, and Group 4-6; $3{\;}{\times}{\;}2{\;}mm$ respectively. Group 1-4 were restored using bulk filling method with Z-250 composite. However, Group 5 was restored incrementally, and Group 6 was restored with an indirect resin inlay. The cusp deflection was recorded at the buccal and lingual cusp tips using LVDT probe for 10,000 seconds. The measured cusp deflections were compared between groups, and the relationship between the cube of the length of cavity wall/the cube of the thickness of cavity wall ($L^3/T^3$). C-factor and cusp deflection or % flexure ($100{\;}{\times}$ cuspal deflection / cavity width) was analyzed. The cusp deflection of Group 1-4 were $12.1{\;}\mu\textrm{m},{\;}17.2{\;}\mu\textrm{m},{\;}16.2{\;}\mu\textrm{m}{\;}and{\;}26.4{\;}\mu\textrm{m}$ respectively. The C-factor was related to the % flexure rather than the cusp deflection. There was a strong positive correlationship between the $L^3/T^3$ and the cusp deflection. The cusp deflection of Group 5 and 6 were $17.4{\;}\mu\textrm{m}{\;}and{\;}17.9{\;}\mu\textrm{m}$ respectively, which are much lower value than that of Group 4.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. de Gee AF, Feilzer AJ, Davidson CL. True linear polymerization shrinkage of unfilled resins and composites determined with a linometer. Dent Mater 9: 11-4, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90097-A
  2. Song YX. Inoue K. Linear shrinkage of photo-activated composite resins during setting. J Oral Rehabil 28:335-41. 2001 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00661.x
  3. IB Lee. A new method?real time measurement of the initial dynamic volumetric shrinkage of composite resins during polymerization. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 26:134-140, 2001
  4. Rosin M, Urban AD, Gartner C. Bernhardt O, Splieth C, Meyer G. Polymerization shrinkage-strain and microleakage in dentin-bordered cavities of chemically and light-cured restorative materials. Dent Mater 18:521-8, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00078-1
  5. Goldman M. Polymerization shrinkage of resin-based restorative materials. Aust Dent J 28:156-61, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1983.tb05272.x
  6. Rees JS. Jacobsen PH. The polymerization shrinkage of composite resins. Dent Mater 5:41-4, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(89)90092-4
  7. Lai JH. Johnson AE. Measuring polymerization shrinkage of photo-activated restorative materials by a water-filled dilatometer. Dent Mater 9: 139-43. 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90091-4
  8. Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ. Verdonschot EH. Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent 26: 555-62, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00042-0
  9. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC. Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH. A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 21: 17-24, 1996
  10. Segura A, Donly KJ. In vitro posterior composite polymerization recovery following hygroscopic expansion. J Oral Rehabil 20:495-9, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1993.tb01636.x
  11. Alomari QD, Reinhardt JW, Boyer DB. Effect of liners on cusp deflection and gap formation in composite restorations. Oper Dent 26:406-11, 2001
  12. Suliman AH. Boyer DB, Lakes RS. Polymerization shrinkage of composite resins: comparison with tooth deformation. J Prosthet Dent 71: 7-12, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90247-X
  13. Meredith N, Setchell DJ. In vitro measurement of cuspal strain and displacement in composite restored teeth. J Dent 25:331-7, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00047-4
  14. McCullock AJ. Smith BG. In vitro studies of cusp reinforcement with adhesive restorative material. Br Dent J 161:450-2, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4806005
  15. Suliman AA, Boyer DB. Lakes RS. Interferometric measurements of cusp deformation of teeth restored with composites. J Dent Res 72: 1532-6, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345930720111201
  16. Pearson GJ, Hegarty SM. Cusp movement of molar teeth with composite filling materials in conventional and modified MOD cavities. Br Dent J 166:162-5, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4806750
  17. Jantarat J, Panitvisai P, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Comparison of methods for measuring cuspal deformation in teeth. J Dent 29:75-82, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00040-3
  18. Hood JA. Biomechanics of the intact, prepared and restored tooth: some clinical implications. Int Dent J 41:25-32, 1991
  19. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 63: 146-8, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630021001
  20. Unterbrink GL, Liebenberg WH. Flowable resin composites as 'filled adhesives': literature review and clinical recommendations. Quintessence Int 30:249-57, 1999
  21. Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J Dent Res 75:871-8, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750030301
  22. Abbas G, Fleming GJ, Harrington E, Shortall AC, Burke FJ. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with a packable composite cured in bulk or in increments. J Dent 31 : 437-44, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00121-5
  23. Rees JS et.al. A reappraisal of the incremental packing technique for light cured composite resins. J Oral Rehabil 31:81-4, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01073.x
  24. Rees JS. Jacobsen PH Stresses generated by luting resins during cementation of composite and ceramic inlays. J Oral Rehabil 19: 115-22, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1992.tb01088.x
  25. Ericson D, Paulsson L, Sowiak H, Derand T. Reduction of cusp deflection resulting from composite polymerization shrinkage, using a light-transmitting cone. Scand J Dent Res 102:244-8, 1994
  26. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ. Light-curing units, polymerization, and clinical implications. J Adhes Dent 2: 167-73, 2000
  27. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Increased wall-to-wall curing contraction in thin bonded resin layers. J Dent Res 68: 48-50, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680010701
  28. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ. Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 66:1636-9, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660110601
  29. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 25:435-40, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00063-2
  30. IB Lee, HH Son, HC Kwon, CM Um, BH Cho. The effect of viscosity, specimen geometry and adhesion on the linear polymerization shrinkage measurement of light cured composites. J of Kor Aca of Cons Dent 28:457-466, 2003 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.6.457
  31. Davidson CL, Van Zeghbroeck L, Feilzer AJ. Destructive stresses in adhesive luting cements. J Dent Res 70:880-2, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345910700050301
  32. Alster D, Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL Polymerization contraction stress in thin resin composite layers as a function of layer thickness. Dent Mater 13:146-50, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80115-7
  33. RG. Craig, JM Powers. Restorative dental materials 11th ed., Mosby, Inc. p87-8, 2002
  34. Blank JT. Scientifically based rationale and protocol for use of modern indirect resin inlays and onlays. J Esthet Dent 12: 195-208, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00222.x
  35. Watts DC, Cash AJ. Determination of polymerization shrinkage kinetics in visible-light-cured materials methods development. Dent Mater 7:281-7, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(05)80030-2