Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.6.532

INFLUENCE OF CAVITY SIZE AND RESTORATION METHODS ON THE CUSP DEFLECTION IN COMPOSITE RESTORATION  

Lee Mi-Ra (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Lee In-Bog (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Seok Chang-In (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Lee Sang-Tag (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Um Chung-Moon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.29, no.6, 2004 , pp. 532-540 More about this Journal
Abstract
The aim of this study was to measure the cusp deflection during composite restoration for MOD cavity in premolar and to examine the influence of cavity dimension, C-factor and restoration method on the cusp deflection. Thirty extracted maxillary premolar were prepared to four different sizes of MOD cavity and divided into six groups. The width and depth of the cavity were as follows. Group 1; $1.5{\;}{\times}{\;}1{\;}mm$, Group 2; $1.5{\;}{\times}{\;}2{\;}mm$, Group 3; $3{\;}{\times}{\;}1{\;}mm$, and Group 4-6; $3{\;}{\times}{\;}2{\;}mm$ respectively. Group 1-4 were restored using bulk filling method with Z-250 composite. However, Group 5 was restored incrementally, and Group 6 was restored with an indirect resin inlay. The cusp deflection was recorded at the buccal and lingual cusp tips using LVDT probe for 10,000 seconds. The measured cusp deflections were compared between groups, and the relationship between the cube of the length of cavity wall/the cube of the thickness of cavity wall ($L^3/T^3$). C-factor and cusp deflection or % flexure ($100{\;}{\times}$ cuspal deflection / cavity width) was analyzed. The cusp deflection of Group 1-4 were $12.1{\;}\mu\textrm{m},{\;}17.2{\;}\mu\textrm{m},{\;}16.2{\;}\mu\textrm{m}{\;}and{\;}26.4{\;}\mu\textrm{m}$ respectively. The C-factor was related to the % flexure rather than the cusp deflection. There was a strong positive correlationship between the $L^3/T^3$ and the cusp deflection. The cusp deflection of Group 5 and 6 were $17.4{\;}\mu\textrm{m}{\;}and{\;}17.9{\;}\mu\textrm{m}$ respectively, which are much lower value than that of Group 4.
Keywords
Cusp deflection; Cavity dimension; C-factor; Bulk-cure; Incremental cure; Indirect resin inlay;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Goldman M. Polymerization shrinkage of resin-based restorative materials. Aust Dent J 28:156-61, 1983   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Suliman AA, Boyer DB. Lakes RS. Interferometric measurements of cusp deformation of teeth restored with composites. J Dent Res 72: 1532-6, 1993   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
3 Unterbrink GL, Liebenberg WH. Flowable resin composites as 'filled adhesives': literature review and clinical recommendations. Quintessence Int 30:249-57, 1999
4 Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J Dent Res 75:871-8, 1996   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Rees JS et.al. A reappraisal of the incremental packing technique for light cured composite resins. J Oral Rehabil 31:81-4, 2004   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
6 Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ. Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 66:1636-9, 1987   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
7 Alster D, Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL Polymerization contraction stress in thin resin composite layers as a function of layer thickness. Dent Mater 13:146-50, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
8 RG. Craig, JM Powers. Restorative dental materials 11th ed., Mosby, Inc. p87-8, 2002
9 Blank JT. Scientifically based rationale and protocol for use of modern indirect resin inlays and onlays. J Esthet Dent 12: 195-208, 2000   DOI
10 Watts DC, Cash AJ. Determination of polymerization shrinkage kinetics in visible-light-cured materials methods development. Dent Mater 7:281-7, 1991   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Davidson CL, de Gee AJ. Light-curing units, polymerization, and clinical implications. J Adhes Dent 2: 167-73, 2000   PUBMED
12 Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 25:435-40, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Hood JA. Biomechanics of the intact, prepared and restored tooth: some clinical implications. Int Dent J 41:25-32, 1991   PUBMED
14 Rees JS. Jacobsen PH. The polymerization shrinkage of composite resins. Dent Mater 5:41-4, 1989   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Carvalho RM, Pereira JC. Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH. A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 21: 17-24, 1996
16 Jantarat J, Panitvisai P, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Comparison of methods for measuring cuspal deformation in teeth. J Dent 29:75-82, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Ericson D, Paulsson L, Sowiak H, Derand T. Reduction of cusp deflection resulting from composite polymerization shrinkage, using a light-transmitting cone. Scand J Dent Res 102:244-8, 1994
18 Pearson GJ, Hegarty SM. Cusp movement of molar teeth with composite filling materials in conventional and modified MOD cavities. Br Dent J 166:162-5, 1989   DOI   ScienceOn
19 IB Lee, HH Son, HC Kwon, CM Um, BH Cho. The effect of viscosity, specimen geometry and adhesion on the linear polymerization shrinkage measurement of light cured composites. J of Kor Aca of Cons Dent 28:457-466, 2003   DOI
20 Rosin M, Urban AD, Gartner C. Bernhardt O, Splieth C, Meyer G. Polymerization shrinkage-strain and microleakage in dentin-bordered cavities of chemically and light-cured restorative materials. Dent Mater 18:521-8, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Rees JS. Jacobsen PH Stresses generated by luting resins during cementation of composite and ceramic inlays. J Oral Rehabil 19: 115-22, 1992   DOI
22 Suliman AH. Boyer DB, Lakes RS. Polymerization shrinkage of composite resins: comparison with tooth deformation. J Prosthet Dent 71: 7-12, 1994   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Segura A, Donly KJ. In vitro posterior composite polymerization recovery following hygroscopic expansion. J Oral Rehabil 20:495-9, 1993   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Abbas G, Fleming GJ, Harrington E, Shortall AC, Burke FJ. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with a packable composite cured in bulk or in increments. J Dent 31 : 437-44, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Increased wall-to-wall curing contraction in thin bonded resin layers. J Dent Res 68: 48-50, 1989   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
26 IB Lee. A new method?real time measurement of the initial dynamic volumetric shrinkage of composite resins during polymerization. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 26:134-140, 2001
27 Lai JH. Johnson AE. Measuring polymerization shrinkage of photo-activated restorative materials by a water-filled dilatometer. Dent Mater 9: 139-43. 1993   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Meredith N, Setchell DJ. In vitro measurement of cuspal strain and displacement in composite restored teeth. J Dent 25:331-7, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Song YX. Inoue K. Linear shrinkage of photo-activated composite resins during setting. J Oral Rehabil 28:335-41. 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Alomari QD, Reinhardt JW, Boyer DB. Effect of liners on cusp deflection and gap formation in composite restorations. Oper Dent 26:406-11, 2001
31 McCullock AJ. Smith BG. In vitro studies of cusp reinforcement with adhesive restorative material. Br Dent J 161:450-2, 1986   DOI   ScienceOn
32 de Gee AF, Feilzer AJ, Davidson CL. True linear polymerization shrinkage of unfilled resins and composites determined with a linometer. Dent Mater 9: 11-4, 1993   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Davidson CL, de Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 63: 146-8, 1984   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
34 Davidson CL, Van Zeghbroeck L, Feilzer AJ. Destructive stresses in adhesive luting cements. J Dent Res 70:880-2, 1991   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
35 Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ. Verdonschot EH. Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent 26: 555-62, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn