The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지

Correlationship of skeletodental factors to a relapse in class II correctionn

II급 부정교합 치료 후 재발과 골격치성요소의 상관성

  • Chung, Ae-Jin (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Lee, Doe-Hoon (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kang, Kyung-Wha (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Cheol (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 정애진 (원광대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 이도훈 (원광대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 강경화 (원광대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 김상철 (원광대학교 치과대학 교정학교실)
  • Published : 2004.04.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the postretention change of class II malocclusion treatment and to examine which factors were related to the relapse. Seventy-eight treated cases were divided into two groups according to the stability of treatment results. Various measurements in pre-treatment and post-treatment lateral cephalograms were evaluated and comparisons were drawn between the stable and relapse group by t-test and correlation analysis. 1. There were only a row differences in the skeletodental relationship in the pre-treatment phase between the stable and the relapse group. 2. Mandibles in the stable group were repositioned mote anteriorly than those in the relapse group. 3. Mandibular incisors were more uprighted to the basal bone and maxillary incisors were less lingualized in the stable group than in the relapse group. 4. Occlusal plane was inclined forward and downward in the relapse group.

II급 부정교합 치료 후 일어나는 재발에 영향을 미치는 요소를 알아보기 위하여 치료 후 결과가 안정하게 유지된 군과 재발이 일어난 군으로 구분하여 골격 및 치성요소를 비교하였다. 치료 전과 치료 후 측모 두부방사선사진을 이용하여 t-test와 상관분석을 시행한 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 안정군과 재발군 간에 치료 전 골격 및 치성 관계는 대체로 차이가 없었다. 2. 안정군에서 하악골의 전방성장이 더 많이 일어났다. 3. 안정군에서의 하악 전치는 더 직립되었으며 상악전치는 설측 경사가 적은 경향을 보였다. 4. 재발군에서 교합평면이 전하방으로 경사되는 경향을 보였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kaplan H. The logic of modem retention procedures. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988 : 93 : 325-40
  2. Fotis V, Melsen B, Williams S. Posttreatment changes of skeletal morphology following treatment aimed at restriction of Mx. growth. Am J Orthod 1985 : 88 : 288-96
  3. Merrifield LL. Dimensions of the denture: back to basics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994 : 106 : 535-42
  4. King EW. Relapse of orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1974 : 44 : 300-15
  5. Graber T. Postmortems in posttreatment adjustments. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996 : 52 : 331-52
  6. Herzberg R. A cephalometric study of Class II relapse. Angle Orthod 1973 : 43 : 112-8
  7. Nanda RS, Nanda SK. Consideration of dentofacial growth in long term retention and stability; Is activeretention needed? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992 : 101 : 297-302
  8. Nanda SK. Patterns of vertical growth in the face. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988 : 93 : 103-16 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(88)90287-9
  9. Nanda SK. Circumpubertal growth spurt related to vertical dysplasia Angle Orthod 1989 : 59 : 113-22
  10. Goldstein A. The dorninence of the marphological pattern: implication for treatment. Angle Orthod 1953 : 23 : 187-95
  11. Nemeth RE, Isaacson RJ. Vertical anterior relapse. Am J Orthod 1974 : 65 : 565-85
  12. Nanda RS, Meng H, Kapila S, Goorhuis J. Growth changein the soft tissue profile. Angle Orthod 1990 : 60 : 177-90
  13. Shields TE, Little RM, Cbapko MK. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment : A cephalometric appraisal of 1st premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1985 : 87 : 27-38 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(85)90171-X
  14. Klohn SJ. Mixed dentition treatment. Angle Orthod 1950 : 20: 75-96
  15. Schwartz H. The case againstbiomechanics. Angle Orthod 1967 : 37 : 52-7
  16. Schwartz H. The field concept in orthodontics. Angle Orthod 1960 : 30 : 154-61
  17. Shudy GF. Posttreatment craniofacial growth: Its implications in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1974 : 65 : 39-57
  18. 박영철, 백형선, 교정치료의 보정과 안정성. 나래출판사 1996
  19. Moore AW. Orthodontic treatment factors in Class II malocclusion Am J Orthod 1959 : 45: 323-52
  20. Jacobson SO. Cephalometric evaluation of treatment effect on Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1967 : 53 : 446-57
  21. Wieslander L. The effect of force on craniofacial development. Am J Orthod 1974 : 65 : 531-38 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(74)90034-7
  22. Elder JR, Tuenge RH. Cephalometric and histologic changes produced by extraoral high-pull traction to the maxilla in Macaca mulatta. Am J Orthod 1974:66 : 599-617
  23. Melsen B. Effectof cervical anchorage during and after treatment : an implant study. Am J Orthod 1978 : 73 : 526-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(78)90242-7
  24. Baumrind S, Molthen R, West EE, Miller DM. Mandibular plane change during maxiallary retraction. Am J Orthod 1978 : 74: 32-40
  25. Baumrind S, Molthen R, West EE, Miller DM. Distal displacement of the maxilla and the upperfirst molar. Am J Orthod 1979 : 75 : 630-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(79)90095-2
  26. Dellinger K. A cephalometric study to compare the effects of cervical traction and Andresen therapy in the treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusion: part 1 skeletal changes. Br J Orthod 1990 : 17: 33-46
  27. Derringer K. A cephalometric study to compare the effectsof cervical traction and Andresen therapy in the treatmentof Class II, division 1 malocclusion Part 2 dentoalveolar changes. Br J Orthod 1990 : 17: 89-99
  28. Wieslander L, Lagerstrom L. The effect of activator treatment on Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1979 : 75 : 20-6
  29. Vargervik K, Harvold EP. Response to activator treatment in Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1985 : 88 : 242-51
  30. McNanJara JA, Bookstein FL, Shaughnessy TG. Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on Class II patients. Am J Orthod 1985 : 88 : 91-110
  31. Kerr WJ, TenHave TR, McNanJara JA. A comparison of skeletal and dental changes produced by Function Regulators (FR-2 and FR-3). Europ J Orthod 1989 : 11 : 235-42
  32. Pancherz H. The mechanism of Calss II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometic investigation. Am J Orthod 1982 : 82 : 104-13
  33. Wieslander L. Internsive treatment of severe Class II malocclusions with a headgear Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Am J Orthod 1984 : 86 : 1-13
  34. Pancherz H. The Herbst appliance its biologic effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod 1985 : 87 : 1-20
  35. Weber FN. Clinical inverstigations related to use of the Begg technique at the University of Tennessee. Am J Orthod 1971: 59 : 24-36
  36. McCaulety DR. The cuspid and its function in retention. Am J Orthod 1944: 90 : 196-205
  37. Burstone CJ. Deep overbite corrrection by intrusion. Am J orthod 1977: 72 : 1-22
  38. King EW. Variations in profile change and their significance in timming treatment. Angle Orthod 1960: 30 : 141-53
  39. Proffit WR. Equilibriwn theory revisted, factors influencing position of the teeth. Angle Orthod 1978: 48 : 175-86
  40. Tweed CH. Frankfort-mandibular incisor angle(FMIA) in orthodontic treatment, planning and prognosis. Angle Orthod 1954 : 24: 121-69
  41. Steiner CC. The use of cephalometries as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1960: 46 : 721-35
  42. Edwards JG. Circwnferential supracrestal fibrotomy in alleviating relapse. Am J 0$\pi$hod Dentofac Orthop 1988: 93 : 380 -87
  43. Bayron HI, Occlusal changes in adults dentition. JADA 1954: 48 : 674-86
  44. Dyer GS, Vanden JL, Harris EF. Age effects on orthodonic treatment : adolescents contrasted with adults. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991: 100 : 523-30
  45. Harrs EF, Dyer GS, Vaden JL. Age effects on orthodontic treatment assessments from the Johnston analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991: 100 : 531-16
  46. Bordie AG. The fourth dimension in orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1954: 24: 15-30
  47. Litowitz R. A study of the movements of certain teeth during andfollowing orthodontic treatement. Angle Orthod 1948: 18 : 113-32
  48. Bjork A, Skiller V. Facial develpement and tooth eruption: an implant study at the age of puberty. Am J Orthod 1972: 62 : 339-83
  49. Harris EF, Vonden JL, Dunn KL, Behrents RG. Effects of patient age on postorthodontic stability in Class II, division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994: 105 : 25-34
  50. Sadowsky C, Sakols EI. Long-term assessment of orthodontic relapse Am J Orthod 1982: 82 : 456-63
  51. Fidler BC, Artum J, Joondeph DR, Littli RM. Long- term stability of Angle Class II, division 1 malocclusion with successful occlusal results at the end of active treatment Am J Orthod 1995: 107 : 276-85 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70143-5
  52. Rolf B. Postretention analysis of treatment problems and failure in 264 consecutively treated cases. Eur J Ortho 1979: 1 :55-65
  53. Pancherz H. Relapse after activator treatment. A biemetric and elect-romyograpmc study of subjects with and without relapse of ovenject Am J Orthod 1977 : 72 : 499-521
  54. Merrifield LL, Cross JF. Directional forces. Am J Orthod 1970 : 57 : 435-64
  55. Shudy GF, Fred. Cant of occlusalplane and axial inclinations of teeth. Angle Orthod 1963 : 33 : 68-82
  56. Grieves GW. The stability of the treated denture.Am J Orthod 944: 30 : 171-91
  57. Riedel RA. A review of the retention problem. Angle Orthod 1960 : 30 : 179-99