1 |
King EW. Relapse of orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1974 : 44 : 300-15
|
2 |
Nanda RS, Nanda SK. Consideration of dentofacial growth in long term retention and stability; Is activeretention needed? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992 : 101 : 297-302
|
3 |
Schwartz H. The case againstbiomechanics. Angle Orthod 1967 : 37 : 52-7
|
4 |
Shudy GF. Posttreatment craniofacial growth: Its implications in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1974 : 65 : 39-57
|
5 |
Wieslander L. The effect of force on craniofacial development. Am J Orthod 1974 : 65 : 531-38
DOI
PUBMED
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Elder JR, Tuenge RH. Cephalometric and histologic changes produced by extraoral high-pull traction to the maxilla in Macaca mulatta. Am J Orthod 1974:66 : 599-617
|
7 |
Baumrind S, Molthen R, West EE, Miller DM. Distal displacement of the maxilla and the upperfirst molar. Am J Orthod 1979 : 75 : 630-40
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Vargervik K, Harvold EP. Response to activator treatment in Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1985 : 88 : 242-51
|
9 |
Burstone CJ. Deep overbite corrrection by intrusion. Am J orthod 1977: 72 : 1-22
|
10 |
Steiner CC. The use of cephalometries as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1960: 46 : 721-35
|
11 |
Bjork A, Skiller V. Facial develpement and tooth eruption: an implant study at the age of puberty. Am J Orthod 1972: 62 : 339-83
|
12 |
Shudy GF, Fred. Cant of occlusalplane and axial inclinations of teeth. Angle Orthod 1963 : 33 : 68-82
|
13 |
Riedel RA. A review of the retention problem. Angle Orthod 1960 : 30 : 179-99
|
14 |
Graber T. Postmortems in posttreatment adjustments. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996 : 52 : 331-52
|
15 |
Nemeth RE, Isaacson RJ. Vertical anterior relapse. Am J Orthod 1974 : 65 : 565-85
|
16 |
Wieslander L, Lagerstrom L. The effect of activator treatment on Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1979 : 75 : 20-6
|
17 |
Proffit WR. Equilibriwn theory revisted, factors influencing position of the teeth. Angle Orthod 1978: 48 : 175-86
|
18 |
Dyer GS, Vanden JL, Harris EF. Age effects on orthodonic treatment : adolescents contrasted with adults. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991: 100 : 523-30
|
19 |
Goldstein A. The dorninence of the marphological pattern: implication for treatment. Angle Orthod 1953 : 23 : 187-95
|
20 |
Tweed CH. Frankfort-mandibular incisor angle(FMIA) in orthodontic treatment, planning and prognosis. Angle Orthod 1954 : 24: 121-69
|
21 |
Melsen B. Effectof cervical anchorage during and after treatment : an implant study. Am J Orthod 1978 : 73 : 526-40
DOI
PUBMED
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Pancherz H. Relapse after activator treatment. A biemetric and elect-romyograpmc study of subjects with and without relapse of ovenject Am J Orthod 1977 : 72 : 499-521
|
23 |
Rolf B. Postretention analysis of treatment problems and failure in 264 consecutively treated cases. Eur J Ortho 1979: 1 :55-65
|
24 |
박영철, 백형선, 교정치료의 보정과 안정성. 나래출판사 1996
|
25 |
Edwards JG. Circwnferential supracrestal fibrotomy in alleviating relapse. Am J 0 hod Dentofac Orthop 1988: 93 : 380 -87
|
26 |
Harris EF, Vonden JL, Dunn KL, Behrents RG. Effects of patient age on postorthodontic stability in Class II, division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994: 105 : 25-34
|
27 |
Merrifield LL, Cross JF. Directional forces. Am J Orthod 1970 : 57 : 435-64
|
28 |
Nanda RS, Meng H, Kapila S, Goorhuis J. Growth changein the soft tissue profile. Angle Orthod 1990 : 60 : 177-90
|
29 |
Bayron HI, Occlusal changes in adults dentition. JADA 1954: 48 : 674-86
|
30 |
Schwartz H. The field concept in orthodontics. Angle Orthod 1960 : 30 : 154-61
|
31 |
Nanda SK. Circumpubertal growth spurt related to vertical dysplasia Angle Orthod 1989 : 59 : 113-22
|
32 |
Klohn SJ. Mixed dentition treatment. Angle Orthod 1950 : 20: 75-96
|
33 |
Fidler BC, Artum J, Joondeph DR, Littli RM. Long- term stability of Angle Class II, division 1 malocclusion with successful occlusal results at the end of active treatment Am J Orthod 1995: 107 : 276-85
DOI
|
34 |
Dellinger K. A cephalometric study to compare the effects of cervical traction and Andresen therapy in the treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusion: part 1 skeletal changes. Br J Orthod 1990 : 17: 33-46
|
35 |
Merrifield LL. Dimensions of the denture: back to basics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994 : 106 : 535-42
|
36 |
Grieves GW. The stability of the treated denture.Am J Orthod 944: 30 : 171-91
|
37 |
Derringer K. A cephalometric study to compare the effectsof cervical traction and Andresen therapy in the treatmentof Class II, division 1 malocclusion Part 2 dentoalveolar changes. Br J Orthod 1990 : 17: 89-99
|
38 |
Sadowsky C, Sakols EI. Long-term assessment of orthodontic relapse Am J Orthod 1982: 82 : 456-63
|
39 |
Moore AW. Orthodontic treatment factors in Class II malocclusion Am J Orthod 1959 : 45: 323-52
|
40 |
Wieslander L. Internsive treatment of severe Class II malocclusions with a headgear Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Am J Orthod 1984 : 86 : 1-13
|
41 |
McNanJara JA, Bookstein FL, Shaughnessy TG. Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on Class II patients. Am J Orthod 1985 : 88 : 91-110
|
42 |
Nanda SK. Patterns of vertical growth in the face. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988 : 93 : 103-16
DOI
ScienceOn
|
43 |
Herzberg R. A cephalometric study of Class II relapse. Angle Orthod 1973 : 43 : 112-8
|
44 |
Jacobson SO. Cephalometric evaluation of treatment effect on Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1967 : 53 : 446-57
|
45 |
Shields TE, Little RM, Cbapko MK. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment : A cephalometric appraisal of 1st premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1985 : 87 : 27-38
DOI
ScienceOn
|
46 |
Baumrind S, Molthen R, West EE, Miller DM. Mandibular plane change during maxiallary retraction. Am J Orthod 1978 : 74: 32-40
|
47 |
Bordie AG. The fourth dimension in orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1954: 24: 15-30
|
48 |
Kaplan H. The logic of modem retention procedures. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988 : 93 : 325-40
|
49 |
King EW. Variations in profile change and their significance in timming treatment. Angle Orthod 1960: 30 : 141-53
|
50 |
Litowitz R. A study of the movements of certain teeth during andfollowing orthodontic treatement. Angle Orthod 1948: 18 : 113-32
|
51 |
Kerr WJ, TenHave TR, McNanJara JA. A comparison of skeletal and dental changes produced by Function Regulators (FR-2 and FR-3). Europ J Orthod 1989 : 11 : 235-42
|
52 |
Pancherz H. The Herbst appliance its biologic effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod 1985 : 87 : 1-20
|
53 |
Weber FN. Clinical inverstigations related to use of the Begg technique at the University of Tennessee. Am J Orthod 1971: 59 : 24-36
|
54 |
McCaulety DR. The cuspid and its function in retention. Am J Orthod 1944: 90 : 196-205
|
55 |
Harrs EF, Dyer GS, Vaden JL. Age effects on orthodontic treatment assessments from the Johnston analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991: 100 : 531-16
|
56 |
Fotis V, Melsen B, Williams S. Posttreatment changes of skeletal morphology following treatment aimed at restriction of Mx. growth. Am J Orthod 1985 : 88 : 288-96
|
57 |
Pancherz H. The mechanism of Calss II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometic investigation. Am J Orthod 1982 : 82 : 104-13
|