구치부 부분 무치악 결손에서 유용한 세 가지 임프란트 수복법들의 응력분산에 관한 3차원 유한요소법적 비교연구

THE THREE DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF THE STRESS DISTRIBUTION IN THE THREE TREATMENT OPTIONS OF IMPLANTS RESTORATIONS FOR THE POSTERIOR PARTIAL EDENTULISM

  • 김일규 (인하대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 이성호 (인하대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 류승현 (인하대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 최진호 (인하대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 한예숙 (인하대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 손충렬 (인하대학교 선박공학과) ;
  • 변효인 (인하대학교 선박공학과)
  • Kim, Il-Kyu (Dept. of Dentistry, Medical College, In-Ha University) ;
  • Lee, Hyeung-Uk (Dept. of Dentistry, Medical College, In-Ha University) ;
  • Ryu, Seung-Hyun (Dept. of Dentistry, Medical College, In-Ha University) ;
  • Choi, Jin-Ho (Dept. of Dentistry, Medical College, In-Ha University) ;
  • Han, Ye-Sook (Dept. of Dentistry, Medical College, In-Ha University) ;
  • Son, Choong-Yul (Dept. of Naval Archi & Ocean Eng, In-Ha University) ;
  • Byun, Hyo-In (Dept. of Naval Archi & Ocean Eng, In-Ha University)
  • 발행 : 2004.06.30

초록

In this study, three treatment options to replace two posterior missing teeth were investigated using three dimensional finite element analysis: two wide(${\phi}5.0mm$) implants(the experimental model I), two standard(${\phi}3.75mm$) implants(the experimental model II), and three standard(${\phi}3.75mm$) implants(the experimental model III). Two kinds of load case were applied ; 1) perpendicular on occlusal surface(axial load), parallel on occlusal surface(lateral load). 2) perpendicular on occlusal surface(3mm lateral to central point). The results obtained from this study were as follows; value of Von-mises stress (equivalent stress) was smallest in the two wide implant among the three experimental models. It was reported that the diameter is the efficient factor than osseointegrated surface area.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adell R et al. : Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986;15:39
  2. Skalak R : Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses, J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:843
  3. Brunski JB : Biomaterials and biomechanics in the design of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:85
  4. Bidez MW, Misch CE : Force transfer in implant dentistry : Basic concepts and principles. J Oral Implantology 1992;18:264
  5. Babbush CA : Endosteal hollow-basket implant systems. Reconstructive preprosthetic oral and maxillofacial surgery. WB Saunders. 1986, p.254
  6. Haack JE, Sakaguchi RL, Sun T, Coffey JP : Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:529
  7. Lavernia CJ : An analysis of stress in dental implant system. J Biomed 1981;14:555
  8. Clift SE : Stress and strain distribution in the bone surrounding a new design og dental implants. Proceedings of the Institution of Mech. Engineers. Part H-Journal of Engineering in Medicine. 1993;207:133
  9. Ochi S, Morris HF, Winkler S : The influence of implant type, material, coating, diameter, and length on periotest values at second-stage surgery. Implant Dent 1994;3(3):159
  10. Aparicio C, Orozco P : Use of 5-mm-diameter implants: Periotest values related to a clinical and radiographic evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9(6):398
  11. Matsushita Y, et al. Two-dimensional FEM analysis of hydroxyapatite implants : diameter effects on stress distribution. J Oral Implantol 1990;16(1):6-11
  12. Mahon JM, et al. : Effect of varying fixture width on stress and strain distribution associated with an implant stack system. Implant Dent 2000;9(4):310 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200009040-00006
  13. 이병해 : 유한요소법. 서울, 기문당, 1987, p.17
  14. 권택진 : 응용유한요소해석. 서울, 화성출판사, 1987, p.11
  15. 이재영 : 유한요소법과 농공학에의 활용 (I), 한국농공학회지 1989;31:23
  16. Carl E. Misch : Contemporary implant dentistry 2nd ed. Mosby 1999
  17. Branemark PI : Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399
  18. 조철 등 : 임플란트로 지지된 하악 켄티레버 보철물의 3차원 유한요소분석. 대한치과보철학회지 2000;38
  19. Rieger MR, Mayberry M, Brase MO : A finite element survey of eleven endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:457
  20. Cook SD, et al. : The influence of implant elastic modulus on the stress distribution around LTI carbon and aluminum oxide dental implants. J Biomed mat research 1981;15:879 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820150612
  21. Sato Y, et al. : A biomechanical effect of wide implant placement and offset placement of three implants in the posterior partially edentulous region. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27(1):15 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00475.x
  22. Meijer HJ, Starmans FJ, Steen WH, Bosman F : A three-dimensional finite element study on two versus four implants in an edentulous mandible. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7(3):271
  23. Rangert B. et al. : Bending overload and implant fracture: a retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10(3):326
  24. Canay S, et al. : Comparison of stress distribution around vertical and angled implants with finite element analysis. Quintessence international 1996;27:591
  25. Lawrence A. Weinberg : The biomechanics of force distribution in implant supported prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:19
  26. 김우택 등 : 수직응력하에서 임프란트 나사형태에 따른 응력의 3차원 유한요소법적 분석. 대한구강악안면외과학회지 2001;27(2):111