Korean Journal of Veterinary Service (한국동물위생학회지)

The Korean Society of Veterinary Service (한국동물위생학회)
권호 표지

Antibiotics susceptibility of Proteus mirabilis isolated from domestic animals in Chonbuk province

동물에서 분리한 Proteus mirabilis의 항생제 감수성에 관한 연구

  • Cho, Jeong-Gon (Bio-Safety Research Institute & Department of Veterinary Medicine, Chonbuk National University)
  • 조정곤 (전북대학교 수의과대학 및 생체안전성연구소)
  • Published : 2003.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Isolates of 70 Proteus mirabilis were tested against 10 different antibiotics by a disc diffusion method as recommended by National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS). The isolates were resistant in order of tetracycline(100.0%), enrofloxacin(95.7%), ampicillin(74.3%), choramphenicol(62.9%), cephalothin(58.6%), streptomycin(50%), kanamycin(47.2%), neomycin(35.8%), gentamicin(15.7%), and amikacin(2.9%). In the antibiotic resistant patterns, 37 kinds of multiple resistance patterns of P mirabilis isolates were detected. The highest resistant pattern was ampicillin-cephalothin-chloramphenicol-enrofloxacin-tetracycline(11.6%).

Keywords

References

  1. Carter GR, Chengappa MM, Roberts AW, et al. 1995. Essentials of veterinary microbiology. Williams & Wilkins, Media USA: 147-165
  2. Hirsh DC, Yuan cz. 1999. Veterinary Microbiology. Blackwell Sci, Malden USA: 178-184
  3. Ettinger SJ, Feldman EC. 2000. Textbook of veterinary internal medicine. WB Saunders Co, Philadelphia: 306
  4. 최희인. 1997. 개의 질병. 샤론, 서울. : 266, 315, 320, 387, 405
  5. Bisgaard M, Dam A. 1981. Salpingitis in poultry. II. Prevalence, bacteriology, and possible pathogenesis in egg-laying chickens. Nord Vet 33: 81-89
  6. Karim MR, Ali MR. 1976. Survey of bacterial flora from chicken embryo and their effect on low hatchability. Bangladesh Vet J 10:15-18
  7. Orajaka LLE, Mohan K. 1985. Aerobic bacterial flora from dead-in-shell chicken embryos from Nigeria. Avian Dis 29:583-589 https://doi.org/10.2307/1590649
  8. Safwat, EEA, Awaad MH, Ammer A.M., et al. 1984. Studies on Psedomonas aeruginosa, Proteus vulgaris and S typhimurium infection in ducklings. Egypt J Anim Prod 24:287-294
  9. Randall CJ, Siller WG, Wallis AS, et al. 1984. Multiple infections in young broilers. Vet Rec 114:270-271
  10. McCoy AJ, Liu H, Falla TJ, et al. 2001. Identification of Proteus mirabilis mutants with increased sensitivity to antimicrobial peptides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45(7):2030-2037 https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.45.7.2030-2037.2001
  11. Mutnick AH, Turner PJ, Jones RN. 2002.. Emerging antimicrobial resistances among Proteus mirabilis in Europe: report from the MYSTIC Program (1997-2001). Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection. J Chemother 14(3):253-258
  12. Navarro F, Perez-Trallero E, Marimon JM, et al. 2001. CMY-2-producing Salmonella enterica, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, Proteus mirabilis and Escherichia coli strains isolated in Spain(October 1999-December 2000). Antimicrob Chemother 48(3):383-389 https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/48.3.383
  13. Dance DA, Pearson AD, Seal DV, et al. 1987. A hospital outbreak caused by a chlorhexidine and antibiotic-resistant Proteus mirabilis. J Hosp Infect 10(1):10-16 https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-6701(87)90027-2
  14. Yoshikawa TT, Shibata SA, Chow AW, et al. 1978. Outbreak of multiply drugresistant Proteus mirabilis originating in a surgical intensive care unit: in vitro susceptibility pattern. Antimicrob agents Chemother 13:177-179
  15. Bauer AW, Kirby WMM, Sherris JC, et al. 1966. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol 45:493-496
  16. Prescott LM, Harley JP, Klein DA. 2002. Microbiology. McGraw-Hill, New York USA : 486-516
  17. Parker MT. 1983. Topley and Wilson's principles of bacteriology, virology and immunity. Edward Arnold, London BK : 310-319
  18. Timoney JF, Gillespie JH, Scott FW, Et al. 1988. Hagan and Bruner's Microbiology and infectious disease of domestic animals. Cornell Uni., New York USA: 88-89
  19. Ling GV, Rohrich PJ, Ruby AL, et al. 1984. Canine urinary tract infections: a comparison of in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility test results and response to oral therapy with ampicillin or with trimethoprim-sulfa. JAVMA 185(3):277-281
  20. Nelson RW, Guillermo-Couto C. 2003. Small animal internal medicine. Mosby, Missouri: 624-629
  21. Rohrich PJ, Ling GV, Ruby AL, et al. 1983. In vitro susceptibilities of canine urinary bacteria to selected antimicrobial agents. JAVMA 183(8):863-867
  22. 전국의과대학교수편. 1999. 의학 미생물학. 한우리. 서울 : 258-262
  23. Al Aboudi AR, Shnawa IMS, Hassen AA, et al. 1988. Penetration rate of Proteus organism through egg shell membranes at different temperatures. Iraqi J Vet Sci 1:1-8
  24. Sah RL, Mal MP, Mohanty GC. 1983. Septicemic Proteus infection in Japanese quail chicks(Coturnix coturnix japonica). Avian Dis 27:296-300 https://doi.org/10.2307/1590396
  25. Bisgaard M. 1981. Arthritis in ducks. I. Aetiology and public health aspects. Avian Pathol 10:11-21
  26. Lin MY, Cheng MC, Huang KJ, et al. 1993. Classification, pathogenicity and drug susceptibility of hemolytic gramnegative bacteria isolated from sick or dead chickens. Aian Dis 37:6-9
  27. Lorian V. 1991. Antibiotics in laboratory medicine. Williams & Wilkins, maryland USA: 599-664
  28. Visalli MA, Murphy E, Projan SJ, et al. 2003. AcrAB multidrug efflux pump is associated with reduced levels of susceptibility to tigecycline(GAR-936) in Proteus mirabilis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47(2):665-669 https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.47.2.665-669.2003
  29. Musher DM, Baughn RE, Merrell GL. 1979. Selection of small-colony variants of Enterobacteriaceae by in vitro exposure to aminoglycosides : pathogenicity for experimental animals. J Infect Dis 140(2):209-214 https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/140.2.209
  30. Ueda Y, Matsumoto F, Saito A, et al. 1976. Clinical studies on gentamicin. Jpn J Antibiot 29(3):238-246