수학 ${\cdot}$ 과학 연재 원격 교육 프로그램 개발과 평가

Development and evaluation of distance learning for the gifted students in science and mathematics

  • 정영근 (전남대학교 사범대학 과학교육학부) ;
  • 고영구 (전남대학교 사범대학 과학교육학부) ;
  • 박종원 (전남대학교 사범대학 과학교육학부) ;
  • 임재훈 (전남대학교 사범대학 수학교육과)
  • 발행 : 2003.09.01

초록

본 연구에서는 중학교 수학·과학 영재학생을 대상으로 하는 원격교육 자료를 개발하고 원격교육을 실시하여 학생의 반응을 분석하였다. 원격교육은 4가지 유형 - 원격강의용 프로그램을 이용한 강의형, 시뮬레이션 프로그램을 통한 실습형, 토론식 과제해결형, 문제해결형 - 으로 개발하였고, 학생의 반응은 8개 영역 - 자극, 난이도, 구성, 학습환경, 참여, 상호작용, 학습결과, 다른 수업과의 비교 - 에서 조사되었다. 조사 결과, 난이도는 모두 높게 나타났지만 원격교육이 학생에게 주는 자극은 모두 긍정적인 것으로 나타났고 개발한 원격교육이 창의성, 논리적 사고, 지적능력, 정보탐색 능력 향상에도 도움이 된다고 응답 하였다. 영재학생들은 학습내용을 상세하게 설명해 주는 방식보다는 적절한 안내 후에 스스로 실습해 보게 함으로써 인지적인 도전을 유발하게 하는 것이 참여도를 높이는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 토론식 과제해결형과 같이 토론을 유도한 경우에서만 상호작용이 있는 것으로 나타났다.

Development and evaluation of distance learning for the gifted students in science and mathematics In this study, we developed and administrated the distance learning for the gifted students in science and mathematics, and analysed their responses. To do this, four types of teaching programs - lectures using program for distance learning, practice activities using simulation program, tasks solving programs based on discussions, and problem solving activities - were developed and students responses were analysed in eight area - stimulus, difficulties, structure, learning circumstances, involvement, interaction, learning outcomes, comparison with other learning -. As results, it was found that many students responded positively and thought programs helped their creativity, logical thinking, intelligent ability, and information searching ability. Students preferred practice activities based on appropriate guidances to lectures providing detailed explanations. And interaction could be stimulated by inducing discussion.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adams, C.M., & Cross, T.L. (2000). Distance learning opportunities for academically gifted students. journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11(2), 88-96
  2. Choi, E., & Park, J. (2003). Conditions for the effective use of simulation and its application to middle-school physics inquiry activities. journal of the Korean Physical Society, 42(3), 318-324
  3. Clake, D. (1999). Getting results with distance learning. The American journal of Distance Education, 12(1), 38-51 https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649809526982
  4. Donahue, S. (1996). Programs and resources in distance education. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(11), 870-874 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199611)47:11<870::AID-ASI12>3.0.CO;2-Z
  5. Ferguson, L., & Wijekumar, K. (2000). Effective design & use of web-based distance learning environments. Professional Scfety, December, 28-32
  6. Lewis, G., & Talbert, M. (1990). Telelearning: Reaching out to the gifted in rural schools. Educating Able Learners, 15(1), 2-3, 10
  7. Linn, M.C. (1996). Cognition and distance learning. journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(1), 826-842 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199611)47:11<826::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-4
  8. Linn, M.C. (1996). Cognition and distance learning. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(11), 826-842 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199611)47:11<826::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-4
  9. Martin, E.E., & Rainey, L. (1993). Student achievement and attitude in a satellite-delivered high school science course. The American Journal of Distance Education, 7(1), 54-61 https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649309526810
  10. McKinnon, D.H., & Nolan, C.J.P. (1999). Distance education for the gifted and talented: An interactive design model. Roeper Review, 21(4), 320 https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199909553985
  11. National Educational Association (2000). (Web Page), URL http://www.nea.org/nr/nrl0000614.html
  12. Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Limburg-Weber, L. (1999). Designs for excellence: A guide to educational program options for academically talented middle & secondary school students. Evanston, IL: Center for Talent Development. Northwestern University
  13. Reisman, S., Dear, R.G., & Edge, D. (2001). Evolution of we-based distance learning strategies. The International Journal of Educational Management, 15(5), 245-251 https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540110396913
  14. Riley, D. (1990). Learning about systems by making models. Computers in Education, 15, 255-263 https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1315(90)90155-Z
  15. Souder, W.E. (1993). The effectiveness of traditional vs. satellite delivery in three management of technology master's degree programs. The American Journal of Distance Education, 7(1), 37-53 https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649309526809