영재교육연구 (Journal of Gifted/Talented Education)

한국영재학회 (The Korean Society for the Gifted)
권호 표지

영재학생과 일반학생의 사고양식 차이 및 교사 특성별 사고양식

Differences in thinking styles of students between gifted and average students and thinking styles of teachers by characteristics

  • 발행 : 2003.09.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 Sternberg의 정신자치제 이론에 근거하여 영재학생과 일반학생의 사고양식에 특별한 차이가 있는지, 또한 영재학교와 일반학교에 근무하는 교사특성에 따라 사고양식에 차이가 있는지를 알아보는 것이었다. 본 연구를 위하여 영재 고등학생 191명과 일반 고등학생 245명, 교사 73명이 참가하여 사고양식 설문조사에 응답하였다. 연구의 주요 결과들은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 영재학생과 일반학생의 사고양식은 차이가 있었다. 영재 학생은 일반 학생에 비해 입법적, 행정적, 사법적, 전체적, 계급주의적, 내부지향적 사고를 선호하는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 영재학교 교사와 일반학교의 교사의 사고 양식에는 차이가 없었다. 셋째, 교사 근무연한에 따라 교사의 사고양식에 차이를 보였다. 교직 경력이 오래될수록 보다 행정적, 지엽적, 보수적 사고양식을 보였다. 넷째, 교사의 성별, 가르치는 과목에 따른 교사의 사고양식의 차이는 나타나지 않았다. 영재 교육을 계획함에 있어서 또한 영재교육을 위한 교사선발에 있어서 효과적인 영재교육을 위해 학생과 교사의 사고양식을 고려하는 것이 요청된다.

On the basis of Sternberg's the theory of mental self-government, this study investigated the differences in students' thinking styles between gifted and average students and the differences in teachers' thinking styles by school quality (gifted school/ average school), sex, professional teaching experience (as measured by duration), and subject of teaching. The subjects were consisted of 191 gifted high school freshmen, 245 average high school freshmen, and 73 teachers. The results of this study were as follows: First, there were statistical differences in many of thinking styles between gifted and average student school. Gifted students scored higher on the legislative, executive, judicial, global, and hierarchic, internal thinking styles. Second, there were no differences in teachers' thinking styles by school quality (gifted school/ average school). Third, teachers with more professional teaching experience (as measured by duration) tended to score higher on the executive, local, and conservative thinking styles. Fourth, there were no differences in teachers' thinking styles by sex and by subject of teaching. To conclude, the thinking styles of students and teachers can play an important role in teaching and learning in schools. Therefore, we need the cognition of thinking styles of students and teachers for the ideal gifted identification and instructional procedures.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김효순(2003), 사고양식 . 자기효능감 . 학업성취도의 구조적 관계 분석. 박사학위논문. 전북대학교
  2. 문태형(2002). 어머니의 사고양식 및 양육효능감과 유아의 사회적 능력과의 관계. 아동학회지, 23, 49-63
  3. 윤미선(1997). 사고양식과 학업성취에 관한 연구-Sternberg의 지능자치제 이론을 중심으로-. 석사학위논문. 고려대학교
  4. 윤소정(2001). 고등학교 영재학생과 일반학생의 사고양식과 학습유형 차이. 석사학위논문. 부산대학교
  5. 이군현(1988). 영재교육학. 서울: 박영사
  6. 한기순, 배미란, 박인호(2003). 한국과학영재들은 어떻게 사고하는가. 한국과학교육학회지, 23, 21-34
  7. Biggs, J.(1979). Individual differences in study processes and quality of learning outcomes. Higher Education, 8, 381-384 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01680526
  8. Dai, D. Y., & Feldhusen, J. F.(1999). A validation study of the thinking styles inventory: Implications for gifted education. Roeper Review, 21, 302-308 https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199909553981
  9. Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J.(1993a). Set of Thinking Styles Tasks for Students. Unpublished test
  10. Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J.(1993b). Student's Thinking Styles Evaluated by Teachers. Unpublished test
  11. Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J.(1993c). Thinking Styles Questionnaire for Teacher. Unpublished test
  12. Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J.(1993d). Thinking styles and the gifted. Roeper Review, 16, 122-130 https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199309553555
  13. Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J.(1995). Styles of thinking in the school. European Journal For High Ability, 6, 201-219 https://doi.org/10.1080/0937445940060211
  14. Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J.(1997). Are cognitive styles still in style? American Psychologist, 52, 700-712. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.7.700
  15. Renzulli, J. S.(1986). Three-ring conception of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davison (Eids.), Conception of glftedness(pp.51-92). NY: Cambridge University Press
  16. Sachs, J., & Zhang, L. F.(1997). Assessing thinking styles in the theory of mental self-government: A Hong Kong validity study. Psychological Reports, 81, 915-928 https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1997.81.3.915
  17. Sternberg, R. J.(1988). Mental self-government: A Theory of intellectual styles and their development Human Development, 31, 197-224
  18. Sternberg, R. J.(1990). Thinking styles: Keys to understanding student performance. Phi Delta Kappan, 71, 366-371
  19. Sternberg, R. J.(1994a). Allowing for thinking styles. Educational Leadership, 52, 36-40
  20. Sternberg, R. J.(1994b). Thinking styles: Theory and assessment at interface between intelligence and personality. In Robert J. Sternberg, & P. Ruzgis(Eds.), Personality and intelligence(pp.169-187). NY: Cambridge University Press
  21. Sternberg, R. J.(1995). Styles of thinking and learning. Language Testing, 12, 265-291 https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229501200302
  22. Sternberg, R. J.(1997). Thinking styles. NY: Cambridge University Press
  23. Sternberg, R. J.(2000). Patterns of giftedness: A triarchic analysis. Roeper Review, 22, 231-236 https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190009554044
  24. Sternberg, R. J.(2002). Thinking styles and teachers' characteristics. International Union of Psychological Science, 37, 3-12
  25. Sternberg, R. j., & Wagner. R. k.(1991). MSG Thinking Styles Inventory Mannual. Unpublished manuscript
  26. Sternberg, R. J., & Zhang, L. F.(1988). What do we mean by giftedness? a pentagonal implicit theory. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 88-95 https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629503900205
  27. Sternberg, R. J., & Zhang, L. F.(1998). The pentagonal implicit theory of giftedness revisited: A cross-validation in Hong Kong. Roeper Review, 21, 149-154 https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199809553949
  28. Sternberg, R. J., & Zhang, L. F.(2000). Are learning approaches and thinking styles related? a study in two chinese population. Journal of Psychology Interdisciplinary & Applied, 134, 469-480 https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980009598230
  29. Sternberg, R. J., & Zhang, L. F.(2002). Thinking styles and teacher' characteristics. International Journal of Psychology, 37, 3-12 https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590143000171
  30. Zhang, L. F.(1999). Further cross-cultural validation of the theory of mental self-government. Journal of Psychology Interdisciplinary & Applied, 133, 165-18l https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989909599731
  31. Zang, L. F.(2000a). Are thinking styles and personality types related? Educational Psychology, 20, 271-283 https://doi.org/10.1080/713663742
  32. Zang, L. F.(2000b). Relationship between thinking styles inventory and study process questionnaire. Personality and Individual Difference, 29, 841-859 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00236-6
  33. Zhang, L. F.(2001). Approaches and thinking styles in teaching. Journal of Psychology, 135, 547-562 https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980109603718
  34. Zhang, L. F.(2002). Thinking styles and modes of thinking: Implications for education and research. Journal of Psychology, 136, 245-261 https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980209604153