Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers A (대한기계학회논문집A)

The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers (대한기계학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Semi-Implicit Integration Schemes for Rate-Dependent Plasticity

점소성 구성식의 적분에 미치는 선형화 방법의 영향

  • 윤삼손 (한국과학기술원 기계공학과) ;
  • 이순복 (한국과학기술원 기계공학과)
  • Published : 2003.11.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

During decades, there has been much progress in understanding of the inelastic behavior of the materials and numerous inelastic constitutive equations have been developed. The complexity of these constitutive equations generally requires a stable and accurate numerical method. To obtain the increment of state variable, its evolution laws are linearized by several approximation methods, such as general midpoint rule(GMR) or general trapezoidal rule(GTR). In this investigation, semi-implicit integration schemes using GTR and GMR were developed and implemented into ABAQUS by means of UMAT subroutine. The comparison of integration schemes was conducted on the simple tension case, and simple shear case and nonproportional loading case. The fully implicit integration(FI) was the most stable but amplified the truncation error when the nonlinearity of state variable is strong. The semi-implicit integration using GTR gave the most accurate results at tension and shear problem. The numerical solutions with refined time increment were always placed between results of GTR and those of FI. GTR integration with adjusting midpoint parameter can be recommended as the best integration method for viscoplastic equation considering nonlinear kinematic hardening.

Keywords

References

  1. Miller, A. K.,1987, Unified Constitutive Equations for Creep and Plasticity, Elsevier Applied Scinece, London
  2. Krausz, A. S. and Krausz., K., 1996, Unified Constitutive Laws of Plastic Deformation, Academic Press
  3. Orits, M., and Simo, J. C., 1986, 'An Analysis of a New Class of Integration Algorithms for Elastoplastic Constitutive Equations,' Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng,, Vol. 23, p. 353 https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620230303
  4. Honberger, K., and Stamm, H., 1989, 'An Implicit Integration Algorithms with a Projection Method for Viscoplastic Constitutive Equation,' Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng., Vol. 28, p. 2397 https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620281013
  5. Chaboche, J. L. and Cailletaud, G., 1996, 'Integration Methods for Complex Plastic Constitutive Equations,' Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng., p.125 https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(95)00957-4
  6. Yoon, S., Lee, S.-B., 'A Semi-Implicit Integration for Rate-Dependent Plasticity with Nonlinear Kinematic Hardening,' Transaction of the KSME, A., to be published https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-A.2003.27.9.1562
  7. Lemaitre. J., and Chaboche, J.-L., 1990, Mechanics of Solid Materials, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  8. ABAQUS, User's manual, Version 6.1, 2000, HKS, USA
  9. Martin, E.B. and Mcdowell, D.L., 1997, 'A Semi-Implicit Integration Scheme for Rate Dependent and Rate-Independent Plasticity,' Computer & Structures, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 579-600 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(97)89625-3